Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Off Topic
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 14 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

1,459
Posts
1,843
Votes
Vikram C.#5 Off Topic Contributor
  • Real Estate Investor
  • Phoenix, AZ
1,843
Votes |
1,459
Posts

License to shampoo

Vikram C.#5 Off Topic Contributor
  • Real Estate Investor
  • Phoenix, AZ
Posted

There was recently a debate on this site about the licensing requirements to take pictures of a house in return for compensation. In that thread, I had a little rant about the creeping role of the licensing into all walks of our economic lives to the detriment of our nation as a whole.

Here's a link to an article in the WSJ on this very subject.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703445904576118030935929752.html

It appears that the proportion of the workforce that is in "licensed" jobs has been steadily going up for several decades. It used to be less than 5% of the workforce half a century back, and has now reached 20% of the workforce. No wonder some people think that one would need a license to tak pics of a house.

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

2,873
Posts
690
Votes
James Hiddle
  • Altus, OK
690
Votes |
2,873
Posts
James Hiddle
  • Altus, OK
Replied

Soon you're going to need a license to take a dump.

Loading replies...