Skip to content

Let's keep in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter for timely insights and actionable tips on your real estate journey.

By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions
Followed Discussions Followed Categories Followed People Followed Locations
Minnesota Real Estate Q&A Discussion Forum
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 1 year ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

91
Posts
38
Votes
Daniel Godbout
  • Investor
  • Oceanside, CA
38
Votes |
91
Posts

MN Property Manager Requirements

Daniel Godbout
  • Investor
  • Oceanside, CA
Posted

Hi, what would be the requirements if I wanted to have my father (non-owner) manage a property (SFR) for me in MN? Real estate license, background check, other? I went through the tenant/landlord handbook a little while back, but I don't recall it specifically addressing that.

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

5,013
Posts
6,530
Votes
James Hamling#3 Real Estate News & Current Events Contributor
  • Real Estate Broker
  • Minneapolis, MN
6,530
Votes |
5,013
Posts
James Hamling#3 Real Estate News & Current Events Contributor
  • Real Estate Broker
  • Minneapolis, MN
Replied

@Daniel Godbout Sorry i couldn't chime in earlier to lend some insight but this is first time this came across my awareness. 

To clarify, in MN a person must be a licensed to perform at-charge Property Management services, for others, on a standard commerce basis. 

SO why all the legalize right, well because like any good law there is a series of if's, but's and when's. 

In your instance, as the owner of the property you can have a direct non-licensed employee to perform property management. They must be exclusive to your properties ("your" as in the company that employs them). Now this does create a chain of liability where you (the employer) is liable for any misdeeds by the non-licensed employee be it by intent or ignorance, it will not matter. 

This is why for an investor who get's to a certain portfolio size where they could just hire someone directly and take on yet another role (employer), there is still value in a PM via the shield a licensed PM provides. 

Is the state a fan of those who manage in this manner, not so much, but a good reply is why they don't take issue with the countless employed non-licensed managers at apartment communities all over? And hands down the #1 violators of tenants rights (I mean legit cringe stuff) are those large communities, not investors like those who make up the majority of BP. 

A bit after the fact but maybe find some use of the info. 

Loading replies...