Skip to content

Let's keep in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter for timely insights and actionable tips on your real estate journey.

By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions
Followed Discussions Followed Categories Followed People Followed Locations
Innovative Strategies
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated 7 days ago on .

User Stats

6,614
Posts
10,398
Votes
Don Konipol
#1 Creative Real Estate Financing Contributor
  • Investor
  • The Woodlands TX / Avon, Ct
10,398
Votes |
6,614
Posts

A Unique WEALTH ENHANCEMENT strategy

Don Konipol
#1 Creative Real Estate Financing Contributor
  • Investor
  • The Woodlands TX / Avon, Ct
Posted

Giving credit where credit’s due: John Beck (WAY before he “broke bad”) showed me (and Jimmy Napier) this technique first hand. 

There was a mobile home park for sale in Arizona that was directly “in the path of development” and had the land use approvals for its “highest and best” use, which was commercial/retail development.  The owner had it “informally” up for sale for $500,000.  He was “firm” on the price, having turned down 2 cash offers in the $400,000 range, and turned down a seller finance offer of $490,000.

John Beck used to attend tax auctions, sheriff sales, IRS foreclosures, etc in California, Arizona, and Nevada.  He would bid low (sometimes as low as $25) on lots and acreage nobody else wanted.  Often these properties were landlocked, and were  often in “paper” subdivisions where access existed only in the plans of a developer to build roads. 

John told Jimmy Napier and I that he was going to buy the subject mobile home park by “trading” or exchanging some of these lots to make up a significant portion of the purchase price.  John put together an offer which consisted of $250,000 cash; a second lien he owned with a balance of $60,000 that he had purchased for $30,000 (the interest rate was way below market rate), and 20 lots in a paper subdivision in MARICOPA, Arizona that he had purchased at a tax sale for about $100  per lot, although the developer was selling similar lots for $10,000 each, but the sale of which required the hard sale of free dinner and a gift and 2 high pressure salesman hammering on the “victim” (see Glengarry Glen Ross).

John valued the offer at $510,000, and amazingly the offer was accepted, as is.  John was able to borrow $300,000 against the property (requirements for borrower were a lot less restrictive than they are today).  So the property cost John $250,000 in cash, his cost of $30,000 when he purchased the note, and $2,000 for the lots purchased at tax sale.  $282,000 while everyone else offering $400,000 cash was turned down.  

I wish I could say I successfully used this strategy to purchase property, but I didn’t as it just wasn’t in my comfort zone.  ( I did utilize wrap mortgages, seller financing, mortgage substitution and subordination, and immediate closing no contingency cash offers as a large part of my “creative” strategies.  However, Jimmy Napier became pretty efficient and effective at this exchange technique, though nowhere near as successful as was was “working” notes. 

  • Don Konipol
business profile image
Private Mortgage Financing Partners, LLC