Skip to content

Let's keep in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter for timely insights and actionable tips on your real estate journey.

By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions
Followed Discussions Followed Categories Followed People Followed Locations
Los Angeles County Real Estate Forum
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

User Stats

3
Posts
1
Votes
Robert Sidenberg
  • Arroyo Grande, CA
1
Votes |
3
Posts

Insurance Issue with Multifamily Apartment Building

Robert Sidenberg
  • Arroyo Grande, CA
Posted

We have multifamily property held in our family living trust. Our attorney advised us to be sure the Named Insured on our insurance policy includes our individual names and our family living trust as additional insured. Guard Insurance is telling us they will not do that. Anyone have any issues with this or comments.

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

2,500
Posts
1,437
Votes
Jason Bott
#2 Insurance Contributor
  • Insurance Agent
  • Nationwide
1,437
Votes |
2,500
Posts
Jason Bott
#2 Insurance Contributor
  • Insurance Agent
  • Nationwide
Replied
Originally posted by @Robert Sidenberg:

We have multifamily property held in our family living trust. Our attorney advised us to be sure the Named Insured on our insurance policy includes our individual names and our family living trust as additional insured. Guard Insurance is telling us they will not do that. Anyone have any issues with this or comments.

Robert, if the multifamily is held in the family trust, then the Named Insured should be the family trust, not your personal names.   Your personal names should be listed as Additional Insured.  

At the end of the day, both the trust and the owners of the trust have a financial interest in the property, so there is no reason the insurance company should not add both to the policy.

  • Jason Bott
  • Loading replies...