Here's What Fixer Uppers on the MLS are Selling For

Here's What Fixer Uppers on the MLS are Selling For

Real Estate Agent · Phoenix, AZ · Member since 2016 · 738 posts · 1k+ votes

I did some research this morning to help some new investors I'm working with who are looking for fixer uppers on the MLS here in Sacramento. They were surprised to see how fast properties have been moving and the number of multiple offer scenarios, so I thought this would help.

In the last 6 months, there have been 175 homes sold on the MLS in Sacramento County with the word "fixer" in the property description. They sold for an average of 99.69% of the list price.

Of the 175 that sold, 98 of them went for 100% of asking price or above, with many going for 120-140% of asking price. 

11 went for 80-90% of asking price, 5 were between 70-80%, and only 1 went below 70% at 67%. The rest were all between 90-100%.

THE MARKET RULES ALL

There is simply waaaaay too much demand for housing right now. Just about every transaction I'm involved in, whether I'm the listing agent or the selling agent, is a multiple offer scenario. The nature of multiple offers means competing for the property, which means higher final sales price. 

So, taking the old standard of 70% of ARV minus your repairs simply isn't going to cut it in most cases. You'll be beat by a mile. This is why I'm telling people that if you want to find a deal you're going to need to put in the footwork to go and find something OFF the MLS.

Either that or you're going to need to do the repairs yourself or create some serious value-add to the property to make the numbers work.

You have to understand that by the time a real estate agent is involved in the transaction, you've now got someone who's practically brainwashed to sell the home for the highest price possible even when an all-cash quick close for a discount would be better for the seller. Plus, we have incentive to sell it for a higher price, because we get a higher commission if we do.

I know a guy who hired two people to watch the MLS for him 40 hrs a week and look at every single listing to try and find a deal. Know how many times he pulled the trigger in 3 months? Once.

And that was because the listing agent knew about us already and we gave him both sides of the commission when we bought and  listed it with him when we sold!

The month after that, those people watching the MLS were let go, because there simply weren't enough deals. And this guy had flipped over a hundred homes so he wasn't no rookie either.

The reason he kept getting beat is because there are investors in Sacramento that have flipped over 400 homes, in this area!

I know one. She has her mother sitting at home making offers on the MLS all day long, and they've had over a decade to get their system down pat and find the cheapest quality labor possible. Her AC guy charged half the price ours did, and we were already getting a massive discount!

So that means she could come up a little higher on her bid and still make as much profit, all because she had her system down and her expenses were lower. 

And so we lost. Time and time again on the MLS. We still flipped 1-2 homes per month, but you know where those leads came from? Direct mail. 

He took his morning walk in a different neighborhood every morning, and any time he saw an "ugly house" he'd note the address in his phone. As soon as he got back to the house he'd drop a letter in the mail offering to buy their home. Send enough targeted mail, and eventually you'll find a deal.

With all the TV shows like Flip This House, Fixer Upper, My First Flip, etc. everybody and their momma thinks they can flip a home now, so you've got tons of rookies coming into the market and overpaying for properties too. So that's another reason the percentages are so high.

There's a flip like this right around the corner from me, and they WAY overpriced the home when they listed it too. Been on the market 32 days and already had to reduce the price once. But now it's stale, and they've easily lost $10-20k in profit for their error. Too bad, so sad.

I don't want to crush anyone's dreams, but you've got to be realistic. Deals are out there, but it's a seller's market and so there's already a ton of demand for housing. So don't think that dreamy lowball offer at 50% of ask is ever going to happen. It won't. Not on the MLS at least.

And that's because once it's on the MLS everyone else already knows about it... 

The 400 home flipper with lower expenses, the knowledgeable contractor who can do the work himself and always has free extra materials laying around from other jobs, and the young couple who wants to remodel the home over the next few years to really "make it their own." 

All of these buyers can pay more than you and win.

So keep looking on the MLS if you like, but the investor who spends 40 hours a week looking on the MLS and the investors who spends 40 hours a week looking OFF the MLS at things situations like vacant homes, out-of-state owners, preforeclosures, divorces, bankruptcies, direct mail, etc. will be world's apart in finances and investing success 5 years from now. Just saying :-)

17Reply
59 views

Most Popular Reply

Lender · Granite Bay, CA · Member since 2014 · 456 posts · 454 votes
9y

@Wes Blackwell @Kim Stofan Wes, thanks for the mention of me and my real estate investing group (RosevilleMeetup.com)! Yes, my point last night is that there are a ton of flip deals being done in MLS, and the numbers prove this fact. Not all of them are the home run flips that we all love, but there is a lot of money out there to be made. I also high-lighted a home in Carmichael last night that is an absolute flip opportunity, and I see this all the time. Too many investors are stuck in the past, or stuck on HGTV, where every flip yields a ton of money. I do see some bigger profit flips, like one of the members in my group last night just flipped a home quickly and made $60,000. Another member just made $70,000 on a property that was wholesaled through one of our meetings. You are right, for those who put the time and energy into it, they will make money! If anyone wants to know, we have our next meeting February 7th and the details are at the above mentioned website. That meeting will be a "Wholesaling Boot Camp" taught by me and @Kelly Krezek ....

See this reply in the discussion

20 Replies

Jump to latestLatest
  • Investor · Shreveport, LA · Member since 2016 · 30 posts · 8 votes
    9y
    Great post. I'm interested in this particularly because my wife and I are moving to Chico. Have you had any experience with Flips/Buy and Holds in Butte County? Oroville, Chico, Paradise, Yuba City?
  • Dylan VargasPro Member
    Rental Property Investor · Chico, CA · Member since 2016 · 625 posts · 336 votes
    9y

    @Adam Avinger Welcome! I am in Chico. Lots of competition here to flip etc. Chico is an awesome town to live in. You will love it here most likely.

  • Investor · Shreveport, LA · Member since 2016 · 30 posts · 8 votes
    9y

    @Dylan Vargas - By trade my wife and I work in Physical Therapy. I was in Oroville on a traveling contract for 9 months and absolutely love the area. Oroville is a bit sketch but everything around it is absolutely my cup of tea. Ill send you a PM. Would love to discuss some additional stuff with you. 

  • Residential Real Estate Broker · Morgan Hill, CA · Member since 2015 · 79 posts · 65 votes
    9y

    I am currently looking at multi-family units in Sacramento. Every pundit out there is expecting Sacramento to boom in 2017. In looking at the numbers - and with insights like yours - it sure does sound like that is starting out the year being pretty true.

    R

  • Rental Property Investor · Oakland, CA · Member since 2016 · 268 posts · 106 votes
    9y

    Wow that is crazy! How should a newbie ever be able to find a deal that works out in this market? I guess I'll keep on sending those letters and hope for the best...

  • Investor · Winters, CA · Member since 2016 · 27 posts · 10 votes
    9y

    @Wes Blackwell - phenomenal post! Thank you so much for the information. Have you done any research with multi-family buildings in Sacramento more focused on the buy and hold strategy? Are those properties being overpriced as well? Any information would be greatly appreciated. 

  • Realtor · Rocklin · Member since 2016 · 128 posts · 67 votes
    9y

    Good stuff, Wes! Would you say the same goes for those wishing to utilize the BRRRR strategy in the Sacramento area?

  • Gordon CuffePro Member
    Investor · Roseville, CA · Member since 2009 · 1k+ posts · 583 votes
    9y

    @Adam AvingerHere is an example of what a 4plex is going in Chico. I found an off market 4plex for 359k in Chico with rents of $2800.0 per month where the markets rents can be $3400.0 per month. 

    It looks like lake Oroville will be nice and full this summer because of all the rain which will be nice. 

  • Dylan VargasPro Member
    Rental Property Investor · Chico, CA · Member since 2016 · 625 posts · 336 votes
    9y

    @Gordon Cuffe You are right on this property in Chico. I live 2 blocks away!

  • Real Estate Agent · Phoenix, AZ · Member since 2016 · 738 posts · 1k+ votes
    9y

    @Kim Stofan

    A core concept of real estate investing is that you make money when you buy. If you are able to purchase a home for $20k less, then you have another $20k in equity to hold, it will become $20k in profit when you sell. And it's the easiest money you can make since it's all a negotiation that costs nothing... no repairs, no rehab, value-add, etc.

    And in general, off-market deals will be better than on-market deals because there is far less competition and you're usually dealing directly with the seller. On the MLS, an agent is involved who has incentive to sell the home for a higher price, all communication goes through the agent instead of directly to the seller, and everybody else knows about so there's a lot of competition. Although there still are deals.

    At the Roseville Meetup last night (which EVERYONE here should be going to), @David Oldenburg went over some sample deals members of the group were doing and emphasized the point that while deals are on the MLS, you need to approach real estate investing like a business, not a hobby. Like a professional, not an amateur. You really need to know your numbers, and be willing to work on smaller margins for a higher volume of deals.

    But the main point of this post, along with what I think David's main point was last night, was that if you want to find a great deal you're going to have to work for it and it's not just going to fall in your lap. If it's going to be on the MLS, you really need to know your numbers and be able to properly analyze the deal, and you should have your financing and contractors ready to go so you can take action as soon as the deal hits the market.

    If it's going to be off the MLS, you're going to need to market your compelling message to home sellers however you plan to do that. You're going to need to craft a compelling message, design the marketing materials, put together the list of leads, and send the mailers or knock the doors.

    Either on the MLS or off the MLS, the flipping homes take work. And the investors who are professionals and treat this like a business not a hobby are going to be the ones taking a lion's share of the deals.

    As far as BRRRR goes, I think the time and opportunity for SFR has mostly passed, as prices are too high and there's way too much competition from the owner-occupied buyer base. Rents are too low to cover the mortgage payment in many cases. Although there may be some out there.

    But, if you look at 2-4 unit multifamily the market is ripe with opportunity. Prices are on par with SFR, but more units = more rents. 2-4 unit multifamily is like the weird middle child in between SFR and Commercial Multifamily. Investors with serious money are better off buying 5+ units and going commercial, and most non-investors want SFR, so the demand and prices for 2-4 unit lags behind because too few of investors don't know about the opportunity.

    Several comments down on my other post here I provided some real world examples of small multifamily deals for some perfect examples. 

  • Lender · Granite Bay, CA · Member since 2014 · 456 posts · 454 votes
    9y

    @Wes Blackwell @Kim Stofan Wes, thanks for the mention of me and my real estate investing group (RosevilleMeetup.com)! Yes, my point last night is that there are a ton of flip deals being done in MLS, and the numbers prove this fact. Not all of them are the home run flips that we all love, but there is a lot of money out there to be made. I also high-lighted a home in Carmichael last night that is an absolute flip opportunity, and I see this all the time. Too many investors are stuck in the past, or stuck on HGTV, where every flip yields a ton of money. I do see some bigger profit flips, like one of the members in my group last night just flipped a home quickly and made $60,000. Another member just made $70,000 on a property that was wholesaled through one of our meetings. You are right, for those who put the time and energy into it, they will make money! If anyone wants to know, we have our next meeting February 7th and the details are at the above mentioned website. That meeting will be a "Wholesaling Boot Camp" taught by me and @Kelly Krezek ....

  • Realtor · Rocklin · Member since 2016 · 128 posts · 67 votes
    9y

    Sounds great!  I'm going to try to be at the meeting on the 7th.  Looking forward to meeting some of you that I have seen around the BP forums.  

  • Toronto ON, Canada · Member since 2016 · 96 posts · 26 votes
    9y

    Just came across an interesting article on Trulia which talks about deals to sell homes that are falling through at a faster rate than than they were a year ago. Also older homes are more likely to be in a failed sale. California does show up in the list but its mostly the bigger cities like San Jose and Los Angeles for now. Sacramento is however is not on the list wonder when the winds will change?

    More information could be found in the article in the below link

    https://www.trulia.com/blog/trends/sale-fail/

  • Sacramento, CA · Member since 2014 · 50 posts · 30 votes
    9y

    Just a caveat; when you're looking for homes on your own (off market) have a good Real Estate attorney to write up the deal, as well as making sure there are no encumbrances (liens). Also you will need to have cash in most cases. Also, with the new laws regarding permits (on those homes where you had the "handy men, and do-it-yourself sellers) and energy efficient things such as low flush toilets; be prepared to do your homework if you don't have an agent. Always get a home inspection even if it says "As Is" ! better to lose $400 than thousands you were not prepared to shell out from hidden problems. Not trying to be negative just pointing out if you go it alone without professional help there are things you can learn as you go, or speak with professionals like a Real Estate attorney, Agent, accountant, home inspectors, to help protect your investment.   

  • Chris MasonPro Member
    Moderator
    Lender · CA · Member since 2015 · 9k+ posts · 10k+ votes
    9y

    Hi @Vamshi Ananth,

    I read that article, and others citing it, and believe that they are completely missing what we are seeing "in the trenches" that does not show up in aggregate data.

    What that is, to be specific, is listing agents not being realistic about the condition of the seller's home when trying to secure the listing agreement. Exactly a week ago today, one of our appraisers showed up to a home with the hot water heater in the basement partially submerged in basement flood water. There was a minor river running down the drywall in the living room (visible water damage that was at least a few months old), leading to a little lake in the corner of said living room (visible wood rot too).

    That listing agent took an offer from a retail homebuyer that needed a conventional mortgage. Think about that for a moment! Two years ago, we didn't see stuff that stupid very often because the listing agent would have had the spine to tell the seller "hey if you want top dollar, fix the leaking roof and water intrusion into the basement so retail buyers can get non-hard-money financing on it," but now appraisal reports coming back like that one did is a regular occurrence. Management is pressuring me not to bother locking rates on East Bay area homes until the appraisal is back, confirming that the home is even viable to lend on.

    Another anecdote from about a month ago was the appraiser showing up to find the Oakland home's roof had a tarp covering it, held in place by lawn furniture. Think about that. And then the listing agent acts surprised that the prudent underwriter, upon reading that appraisal report, called for a roof contractor to come out and check the roof out.

    The whole "well, alas, it's not quite good enough for FHA" is a thing of the past. Now, it's that the houses are completely on the verge of collapse, and listing agents are accepting retail non-203k non-FNMAHomeStyle offers with quick closes, and then getting upset that they aren't closing fast due to the condition of the collateral, because they've deluded themselves into thinking that "hot market" somehow means that the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice and Fannie Mae property standards (not FHA, Fannie Mae) have gone out the window. The best thing these listing agents could do, short of having their sellers fix it up, is start seriously evaluating offers from folks using 203k, Fannie Mae HomeStyle, or hard money financing, or who are buying in cash. Note that LTV requirements for FNMA HomeStyle are not different than Fannie Mae vanilla.

    However, back to Sacramento: I have not seen a lot of that sort of nonsense from Sacramento... so far.

  • Chris MasonPro Member
    Moderator
    Lender · CA · Member since 2015 · 9k+ posts · 10k+ votes
    9y

    Hey @Wes Blackwell,

    Have you seen folks trying to use this strategy, this strategy that I'm just kind of making up right here on the spot as a variation of something I've done in the past?

    "Hey listing agent, I'm sure you've got multiple retail quick-close offers on your desk, but this property is totally beat up, and if this offer is the only one with a plan in place to bring it up to basic lending standards as part of the process (reno work to commence post-close, after your seller has been paid), that means this is the ONLY offer on the table that's actually going to close, so accept this offer, and don't talk to me about the fact that it's not at 120% of listing price because again NONE OF THOSE ARE GOING TO CLOSE... except this one."

  • Real Estate Agent · Phoenix, AZ · Member since 2016 · 738 posts · 1k+ votes
    9y

    @Vamshi Ananth @Chris Mason

    Failed deals are in large part the failure of the listing agent to properly screen the offers presented.

    The listing agent should have three main objectives in selling a home:

    1. Fast sale for a high price
    2. Protect the seller's equity
    3. Inform and advise the seller to make the best possible decisions

    The problem comes in the disconnect between #1 and #3. Most real estate agents are brainwashed to try to sell the home for the highest possible price, even when that price is completely unrealistic.

    When this is the approach to selling a home that's in a state of disrepair, it makes it even worse.

    I can't count the number of times I've made an offer on the fixer upper and had them go with an owner-occupied offer instead (higher price) and then two weeks later when they back out the agent calls me up and tells me the other buyer bit off more than he could chew and now they want to sell it to me for the same price they were gonna pay... huh? 

    That's why my offer was lower! I knew what I was buying! 

    But now that agent has to put it back up for sale and waste days on market which is essentially ACID to the price of the home. 

    If they agent was familiar with investors and selling distressed properties, they would have informed the owner of the potential outcomes and advised them on taking a course of action that wouldn't lead to a failed sale.

    All it would've taken was saying "Hey, uhhhh... you might want to fix that." before putting it on the market and many of these failures could be avoided.

    Or simply telling the homeowner that although the all-cash, quick close offer is a lower, it's much more likely to be a sure thing and go all the way through to closing.

    The hierarchy of offer consideration should always be in this order:

    1. Cash 
    2. Conventional
    3. FHA / VA

    A useful concept to understand in this business is that "A fast nickel is better than a slow dime."

    It's the listing agent's job to describe the pros and cons of each offer to the seller and help them make the best decision for their individual situation and motivation for selling the home.

    Home is a wreck and you need to move back east with your family ASAP because of severe medical issues? Then you oughta take the lower, all-cash offer that closes in 10 days.

    Home is immaculate and you're in no rush or hurry to sell, or don't even care if you do? Then we can hold out a little to get you the highest possible price.

    As for the "ONLY OFFER THAT WILL CLOSE!" strategy mentioned above, the tough part is that you might have to educate the agent, and then rely on them to educate the seller. It's like playing a game of telephone in getting to see why your offer is the one they should choose. And in many cases it may be the blind leading the blind.

    But it could work if you touch on the potential loss to the listing agent. Hit him where it hurts:

    "Hey Mr. Agent, I know you may have a higher offer right now... but this home is a wreck so it won't meet the lending standards those other offers require. You'll go into contract, waste time in escrow for 30-45 days, and then have the deal fail last minute because the underwriter won't sign off on it. We see it happen all the time. In fact, California leads the nation in failed sales, Trulia.com just wrote an article on it that I can send you if you like ;-) After the deal falls through and you've wasted all that time and effort, then you gotta go back on the market and start marketing all over again and work twice as hard, or maybe your seller just gets fed up and takes his home off the market and now you're out of a job. And that's not what you want now is it, Mr. Agent?"

  • Castro Valley, CA · Member since 2017 · 1 post · 1 vote
    9y

    Wes-thank you for validating that what I have been experiencing in The East Bay housing market, is what I would expect in the Sacramento area. My most current MLS experience was on Friday. 2 days on MLS, 34 offers. 2 below ask of $250K, 20- $250- 300K, 6-$300 -350K,, and 6 above $350K. I am trying hard to not get too discouraged, but the market is so crazy here. I was thinking of looking in the Sac/Stockton area. I will reach out to you, when I make my way out there. I would love to buy you a coffee and learn more about the area.

    Cynthia

  • Fremont, CA · Member since 2017 · 28 posts · 8 votes
    9y

    great post! @Wes Blackwell

  • San Jose, CA · Member since 2018 · 16 posts · 4 votes
    4y
    Quote from @Wes Blackwell:

    I did some research this morning to help some new investors I'm working with who are looking for fixer uppers on the MLS here in Sacramento. They were surprised to see how fast properties have been moving and the number of multiple offer scenarios, so I thought this would help.

    In the last 6 months, there have been 175 homes sold on the MLS in Sacramento County with the word "fixer" in the property description. They sold for an average of 99.69% of the list price.

    Of the 175 that sold, 98 of them went for 100% of asking price or above, with many going for 120-140% of asking price. 

    11 went for 80-90% of asking price, 5 were between 70-80%, and only 1 went below 70% at 67%. The rest were all between 90-100%.

    THE MARKET RULES ALL

    There is simply waaaaay too much demand for housing right now. Just about every transaction I'm involved in, whether I'm the listing agent or the selling agent, is a multiple offer scenario. The nature of multiple offers means competing for the property, which means higher final sales price. 

    So, taking the old standard of 70% of ARV minus your repairs simply isn't going to cut it in most cases. You'll be beat by a mile. This is why I'm telling people that if you want to find a deal you're going to need to put in the footwork to go and find something OFF the MLS.

    Either that or you're going to need to do the repairs yourself or create some serious value-add to the property to make the numbers work.

    You have to understand that by the time a real estate agent is involved in the transaction, you've now got someone who's practically brainwashed to sell the home for the highest price possible even when an all-cash quick close for a discount would be better for the seller. Plus, we have incentive to sell it for a higher price, because we get a higher commission if we do.

    I know a guy who hired two people to watch the MLS for him 40 hrs a week and look at every single listing to try and find a deal. Know how many times he pulled the trigger in 3 months? Once.

    And that was because the listing agent knew about us already and we gave him both sides of the commission when we bought and  listed it with him when we sold!

    The month after that, those people watching the MLS were let go, because there simply weren't enough deals. And this guy had flipped over a hundred homes so he wasn't no rookie either.

    The reason he kept getting beat is because there are investors in Sacramento that have flipped over 400 homes, in this area!

    I know one. She has her mother sitting at home making offers on the MLS all day long, and they've had over a decade to get their system down pat and find the cheapest quality labor possible. Her AC guy charged half the price ours did, and we were already getting a massive discount!

    So that means she could come up a little higher on her bid and still make as much profit, all because she had her system down and her expenses were lower. 

    And so we lost. Time and time again on the MLS. We still flipped 1-2 homes per month, but you know where those leads came from? Direct mail. 

    He took his morning walk in a different neighborhood every morning, and any time he saw an "ugly house" he'd note the address in his phone. As soon as he got back to the house he'd drop a letter in the mail offering to buy their home. Send enough targeted mail, and eventually you'll find a deal.

    With all the TV shows like Flip This House, Fixer Upper, My First Flip, etc. everybody and their momma thinks they can flip a home now, so you've got tons of rookies coming into the market and overpaying for properties too. So that's another reason the percentages are so high.

    There's a flip like this right around the corner from me, and they WAY overpriced the home when they listed it too. Been on the market 32 days and already had to reduce the price once. But now it's stale, and they've easily lost $10-20k in profit for their error. Too bad, so sad.

    I don't want to crush anyone's dreams, but you've got to be realistic. Deals are out there, but it's a seller's market and so there's already a ton of demand for housing. So don't think that dreamy lowball offer at 50% of ask is ever going to happen. It won't. Not on the MLS at least.

    And that's because once it's on the MLS everyone else already knows about it... 

    The 400 home flipper with lower expenses, the knowledgeable contractor who can do the work himself and always has free extra materials laying around from other jobs, and the young couple who wants to remodel the home over the next few years to really "make it their own." 

    All of these buyers can pay more than you and win.

    So keep looking on the MLS if you like, but the investor who spends 40 hours a week looking on the MLS and the investors who spends 40 hours a week looking OFF the MLS at things situations like vacant homes, out-of-state owners, preforeclosures, divorces, bankruptcies, direct mail, etc. will be world's apart in finances and investing success 5 years from now. Just saying :-)


    And 5 years later, we are still in the same place with even more demand. It's an interesting situation because in order to get to 100+ houses, you need to pull hard on the acquisitions lever, but pulling on that lever requires a lot of time and many "no's" on deals that simply don't have the room and the many lost transactions in bidding wars. Plus the off market deal's margins brought by wholesalers are getting tighter and tighter. It seems like it's time for me to start diving into the generating my own lists and making my own calls for off market deals now. 40 hours a week on the MLS for a month brings me .... MAYBE .... 1 deal with a small margin.

Join the conversationCreate a free account to reply, vote on answers and follow this thread.