Skip to content
Two investors reviewing resources on a laptop

Get industry-leading resources — for free

Unlock resources for every investing strategy and stage with a free account.

By continuing, you agree to BiggerPockets LLC's Terms of Use and Privacy Policy

Followed Discussions Followed Categories Followed People Followed Locations
Chicago Real Estate Forum
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

User Stats

219
Posts
99
Votes
Tyler D.
99
Votes |
219
Posts

Naperville SFH vs Chicago (Condo, SFH, MFH)

Tyler D.
Posted

I'm looking to pick up a lot of rental properties this decade. My strategy is going to be focused on long-term rent appreciation vs short term cash flow, so I will be buying in nicer areas with a focus on rent appreciation over the next 30 years.

I like Naperville for this reason, as it regularly tops rankings for multiple metrics, but has houses available in the 400k range.

I also like the idea of buying in Chicago. The idea of buying condos downtown seems enticing, but it looks like the HOA fees really hurt the math. MFHs seem ideal, but there are almost no good options available. SFH are an option as well.

What do you recommend as the best area/ property type to focus on?

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

1,927
Posts
1,588
Votes
Paul De Luca
  • Real Estate Agent
  • Chicago, IL
1,588
Votes |
1,927
Posts
Paul De Luca
  • Real Estate Agent
  • Chicago, IL
Replied

@Tyler D.

I don't recommend investing in condos for the reason you pointed out. The math often simply doesn't work.

I recommend pursuing either 2-4 unit properties or SFHs in A & B class neighborhoods if appreciation is more important than cash flow. The options available to you will depend on your budget though.

Loading replies...