Skip to content
Two investors reviewing resources on a laptop

Get industry-leading resources — for free

Unlock resources for every investing strategy and stage with a free account.

By continuing, you agree to BiggerPockets LLC's Terms of Use and Privacy Policy

Followed Discussions Followed Categories Followed People Followed Locations
Rehabbing & House Flipping
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

User Stats

85
Posts
17
Votes
Victoria OHare
17
Votes |
85
Posts

2026 Flippers: Tariff Material Costs + Inventory Surge—How's It Hitting Your Numbers

Victoria OHare
Posted

Hello Everyone, 

US flippers averaged $72k gross profit in Q4 2025 (down 7% YoY), with rehab costs up 12% from tariffs/labor—lumber +15%, appliances +9%. Inventory at 4.2 mo supply means faster sales but tighter margins.

News highlights: NAR reports 28% of flips now "light rehab" (under $50k) vs full guts; 65% targeting 20%+ ROI pre-holding costs.

Discussion:

  • Adjusting MAO formulas for $10k+ tariff bumps?
  • Cosmetic-only flips dominating your market?
  • Days on market dropping—price higher or faster turns?

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

1,105
Posts
372
Votes
Bo Smith
  • Hinton, WV
372
Votes |
1,105
Posts
Bo Smith
  • Hinton, WV
Replied

The 2k gross profit average is probably skewed toward experienced flippers who got deals locked in before tariffs hit. New deals pricing in these costs are looking at 15-18% ROI instead of 25-30%, and that's assuming your contractor stays on timeline and doesn't find surprise issues in the walls.

Light rehab dominance makes sense when margins are tighter. You can't afford 10 weeks of holding costs and contractor delays when you're only making 5-20k anyway. The math forces you to either flip cosmetic units fast or don't flip at all. Full gut rehabs are becoming the domain of BRRRR investors who can absorb the longer timeline.

What's interesting is how this is reshaping acquisition strategy. You're not stretching on purchase price anymore because there's no upside to absorb the timeline stretch. Days on market dropping is good news, but if you're competing on price, that eats margin. Are you finding deals where you can actually win on acquisition price without bidding against cash buyers, or has competition forced you to recalculate your target hold periods?

  • Bo Smith
  • Loading replies...