Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Rehabbing & House Flipping
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 5 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

18
Posts
4
Votes
Lauren Salvani
  • Investor
  • Germany
4
Votes |
18
Posts

Take home to the studs vs. complete re-build

Lauren Salvani
  • Investor
  • Germany
Posted

Obviously every property is a different situation that needs to be evaluated but I'd like to find out why it seems most people prefer to take a home down to the studs and renovate versus completely tearing down the property and building a new home.  What are the advantages/disadvantages of each approach?

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

17,995
Posts
17,199
Votes
J Scott
  • Investor
  • Sarasota, FL
17,199
Votes |
17,995
Posts
J Scott
  • Investor
  • Sarasota, FL
ModeratorReplied

Tearing down is more expensive and takes longer, especially when you factor in time and effort to get permits, zoning approval, environmental approvals, etc.

Loading replies...