Skip to content
×
PRO Members Get
Full Access
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime.
Level up your investing with Pro
Explore exclusive tools and resources to start, grow, or optimize your portfolio.
10+ investment analysis calculators
$1,000+/yr savings on landlord software
Lawyer-reviewed lease forms (annual only)
Unlimited access to the Forums

Let's keep in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter for timely insights and actionable tips on your real estate journey.

By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions
Followed Discussions Followed Categories Followed People Followed Locations
Tax Liens & Mortgage Notes
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 6 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

2
Posts
0
Votes
Maen Dabat
0
Votes |
2
Posts

Snowball Strategy Cashflow Help

Maen Dabat
Posted

Hello,

Newcomer here!

With regards to paying off a mortgage using the snowball method, I am a bit confused with how the calculation of the cashflow after the first property is completely paid off. As per the method explained, the value of the monthly mortgage that you are no longer paying for the first property is now being used as part of the cashflow to pay off the second property. However, wouldn't the cashflow from the first property be the rent acquired minus the monthly expenses?

For example:

During mortgage: 
Rent: 1,000
Expenses: 300
Mortgage: 500
Net: 200
Yearly cashflow: 2,400

Without Mortgage:
Rent: 1,000
Expenses: 300
Net: 700
Yearly cashflow: 8,400

The way the strategy is explained, the cashflow is now increased by 6,000 (500 x 12 months).

However, in this case, wouldn't the cashflow from the first property be 8,400 (700 x 12) and that value would then be used to add on to the yearly cashflow to contribute in paying off the 2nd property? 

Maybe I am missing something, but appreciate if anyone can shed some light on this!

Loading replies...