How wide can a rehab range be before the deal becomes too uncertain?
When analyzing a deal, I’m starting to think the repair number itself matters less than the width of the repair range.
A $50k rehab estimate is one thing. But a $40k–$60k range feels very different from a $25k–$85k range, even if the midpoint is similar.
Same ARV. Same purchase price. Completely different risk profile.
So I'm curious how other investors think about this during deal analysis. At what point does the repair range become too wide for you to trust the MAO?
Example:
- Light cosmetic: $20k–$30k
- Moderate rehab: $45k–$65k
- Heavy unknowns: $70k–$120k
Would you still make an offer on all three if the conservative MAO works? Or does a wide range make you pause because it means the scope is not clear enough yet?
I’m especially interested in how people handle this with older houses where the inspection report lists a lot of “monitor,” “recommend further evaluation,” or “end of useful life” notes. Those don’t always become repairs, but they can change the way the deal should be priced.
Do you underwrite from the midpoint, the high end, or some kind of risk-adjusted number?
