Skip to content
Two investors reviewing resources on a laptop

Get industry-leading resources — for free

Unlock resources for every investing strategy and stage with a free account.

By continuing, you agree to BiggerPockets LLC's Terms of Use and Privacy Policy

Followed Discussions Followed Categories Followed People Followed Locations
Real Estate Deal Analysis & Advice
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

User Stats

65
Posts
55
Votes
Ali Kalaei
  • New to Real Estate
  • Houston
55
Votes |
65
Posts

How wide can a rehab range be before the deal becomes too uncertain?

Ali Kalaei
  • New to Real Estate
  • Houston
Posted

When analyzing a deal, I’m starting to think the repair number itself matters less than the width of the repair range.

A $50k rehab estimate is one thing. But a $40k–$60k range feels very different from a $25k–$85k range, even if the midpoint is similar.

Same ARV. Same purchase price. Completely different risk profile.

So I'm curious how other investors think about this during deal analysis. At what point does the repair range become too wide for you to trust the MAO?

Example:

  • Light cosmetic: $20k–$30k
  • Moderate rehab: $45k–$65k
  • Heavy unknowns: $70k–$120k

Would you still make an offer on all three if the conservative MAO works? Or does a wide range make you pause because it means the scope is not clear enough yet?

I’m especially interested in how people handle this with older houses where the inspection report lists a lot of “monitor,” “recommend further evaluation,” or “end of useful life” notes. Those don’t always become repairs, but they can change the way the deal should be priced.

Do you underwrite from the midpoint, the high end, or some kind of risk-adjusted number?

Loading replies...