Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Real Estate Deal Analysis & Advice
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 4 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

7
Posts
1
Votes
Betty Yeo
1
Votes |
7
Posts

Help me analyze. I always feel like I use the calculator wrong

Betty Yeo
Posted

View report

*This link comes directly from our calculators, based on information input by the member who posted.

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

97
Posts
313
Votes
David Lutz
  • Granada Hills, CA
313
Votes |
97
Posts
David Lutz
  • Granada Hills, CA
Replied

To get a cashflow like that you're not in a great area, and it's not a newer home. So assume that you're going to get minimal or even slightly negative real value when you sell (home appreciates slower than inflation). That's not bad, just means you're making all your money from the cash flow. On paper that looks pretty good. Just be careful because the automatic calculators don't necessarily adjust your maintenance and CapEx costs accurately based on the type of tenant and age of home you're getting. Also, on a lower value home a $1000 water heater replacement is going to have a much bigger impact to your returns than on a nicer home renting for twice as much. Assume you're going to get less than is being projected. Personally I'd pass, but if you ask 5 people that you'll get 6 opinions.

Loading replies...