Skip to content
Two investors reviewing resources on a laptop

Get industry-leading resources — for free

Unlock resources for every investing strategy and stage with a free account.

By continuing, you agree to BiggerPockets LLC's Terms of Use and Privacy Policy

Followed Discussions Followed Categories Followed People Followed Locations
Tenant Screening
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

User Stats

208
Posts
137
Votes
Mike D.
  • Investor
  • Indianapolis, IN
137
Votes |
208
Posts

Would you rent to this tenant?

Mike D.
  • Investor
  • Indianapolis, IN
Posted

Hi all. So, I'm into all the details of acquiring and renovating properties and normally leave all the tenant screening management stuff to a management company. Currently my management company is asking if I want to rent to someone whose credit score is in the low 500s, which doesn't meet their criteria, but they otherwise look fine and have a guarantor with an excellent credit score. Would you do it? Bending rules has turned out to be a bad idea in the past but this one sounds like it might be ok--advice appreciated.

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

2,749
Posts
6,191
Votes
Scott Trench
#3 Personal Finance Contributor
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Denver, CO
6,191
Votes |
2,749
Posts
Scott Trench
#3 Personal Finance Contributor
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Denver, CO
Replied

I'll take a different position. I still have yet to hear the story of a bad tenant with a great credit score. I hear plenty of stories about bad tenants with bad credit scores. To me, this credit score seems to be the single best determinant of the likelihood of a tenant to pay on time and treat the place right. 

ALL of my problems have come from tenants who did not flow through my screening process (credit score was poor or unknown because of my ineptitude or failing to screen or because I inherited the tenants from a prior landlord). 

While all of the screening process is important, the credit score is the first and primary thing I look at, and seems anecdotally across hundreds of interactions I've had with landlords to be the single best determinant of whether the relationship will work out. 

One problem with this tenant is that their score is in the 500s, which means they are likely actively behind on many debts. Once one even just gets current, it is likely that their score will jump to the high 600s in a matter of 6-12 months. I've seen this happen because I work with folks in situations like this regularly on a volunteer basis and we hear about it all the time on the BP Money Podcast. 

My exception to the credit score rule would be if the tenant had NO score at all, which likely indicates they are an immigrant, just starting out in adult life, or a huge Dave Ramsey fan. In this case, I'd be fine with the guarantor/tenant relationship. But the poor credit score suggests current, active problems in paying bills that are due RIGHT NOW. That bodes ill for the landlord, in my opinion.

Loading replies...