Specialist · Huntingdon, PA · Member since 2014 · 160 posts · 59 votes
I see a specific "cycle of failure" happen constantly with capital raisers.
You hate marketing, so you hire a "Done-For-You" agency. You pay a retainer, get mediocre results (or used car salesman copy), fire them, and repeat.
The problem isn't usually the agency. It's the sequence.
Think about Asset Management. You wouldn't hire a Property Manager without understanding the basics first (market rents, turn costs, NOI). If you did, you wouldn't possess the contextual competence to know if they were doing a good job until you were broke.
Marketing is no different.
When you hire an agency before you have a proven message, you aren't delegating; you are abdicating. You are handing your reputation to a copywriter who doesn't understand your thesis or your investors.
To break the cycle, you must flip the order:
Founder-Led Strategy: Define your voice and ideal investor yourself.
Prove It: Land the first few investors to validate the message.
Delegate:Then hand the playbook to an agency to execute.
If you can't explain why your marketing works, you don't own your business—you’re just renting your revenue.
The Question: For those who have hired agencies in the past—was the biggest issue: a lack of leads, or that the content just didn't sound like you?
This hits hard. The worst part is when you give them your investor list and they blast generic "10% returns guaranteed!" emails that make you look like a rookie. I learned to stay involved in messaging even when delegating execution - you still need to sound like YOU, not some copywriter who's never done a deal. Are you writing the initial messaging yourself then handing off the distribution?
Oof, the "guaranteed returns" email blast. That's the worst.
To answer your question: yes, exactly.
I wrote the company playbook that acts like the source code. It contains our core identity, audience deep dive, strategy and more. With that documented and the team trained, our messaging stays consistent and effective. No agency, all marketing is done in-house.
How involved are you with the day-to-day content? Do you give most if it a once-over before it goes out or are you at the point where you can trust the team?
I see a specific "cycle of failure" happen constantly with capital raisers.
You hate marketing, so you hire a "Done-For-You" agency. You pay a retainer, get mediocre results (or used car salesman copy), fire them, and repeat.
The problem isn't usually the agency. It's the sequence.
Think about Asset Management. You wouldn't hire a Property Manager without understanding the basics first (market rents, turn costs, NOI). If you did, you wouldn't possess the contextual competence to know if they were doing a good job until you were broke.
Marketing is no different.
When you hire an agency before you have a proven message, you aren't delegating; you are abdicating. You are handing your reputation to a copywriter who doesn't understand your thesis or your investors.
To break the cycle, you must flip the order:
Founder-Led Strategy: Define your voice and ideal investor yourself.
Prove It: Land the first few investors to validate the message.
Delegate:Then hand the playbook to an agency to execute.
If you can't explain why your marketing works, you don't own your business—you’re just renting your revenue.
The Question: For those who have hired agencies in the past—was the biggest issue: a lack of leads, or that the content just didn't sound like you?
The big agencies only provide quality work for BIG clients. Most smaller agencies don’t understand the nuances that differentiate us, thus their output looks alike like a generic program with our company name plugged in. While I ended up putting together our programs by trail, error, education, knowledge, I hired an individual with experience in raising capital for real estate syndications, and thru a number of in person and phone meetings, as well as email, reached the point where she has a much more thorough understanding of our business. However, her strong suit is execution, not creativity. She is able to contract out for creative, and they do a good job of “polishing” my creative ideas into a refined, and ultimately successful marketing campaign. Bottom line is that I am much more involved in the process than I had anticipated at the beginning.