Skip to content
Two investors reviewing resources on a laptop

Get industry-leading resources — for free

Unlock resources for every investing strategy and stage with a free account.

By continuing, you agree to BiggerPockets LLC's Terms of Use and Privacy Policy

Followed Discussions Followed Categories Followed People Followed Locations
Syndications & Passive Real Estate Investing
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

User Stats

49
Posts
27
Votes
Pasquale Zingarella
  • CT
27
Votes |
49
Posts

Blake Capital Groups Demand for Removal of Review and Invest Clearly's Response

Pasquale Zingarella
  • CT
Posted

Invest Clearly recently received a demand letter from Blake Capital Group threatening litigation, over a negative review left by an investor. They claim that the review is defamation, stating that the author did not invest with Blake Capital.

You can read the review in question here: https://investclearly.com/sponsors/blake-capital-group#reviews

We have formally responded stating that the publication will remain on our platform.

Let me be clear, our stance has always been that Invest Clearly will not remove a real review without a valid court order. We require every investor to provide documented proof that they invested with the sponsor prior to publishing their feedback, which is meant to provide a layer of protection for both sponsors and investors.

In this case, I personally moderated the review in question and verified the underlying documentation, which confirmed the investment relationship.

There is no room for defamation on Invest Clearly.

However, if this legal action proves to be an attempt to use intimidation and threats to silence an investor and suppress their right to free speech, Invest Clearly will exhaust all resources to ensure the public is aware.

We are making all communication regarding this matter public. I have established a shared drive containing the initial demand letter, our legal response, and all future correspondence. We invite independent journalists, limited partners, and industry professionals to review the materials and follow the case.

https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1n6kC8Q6TmBb98XDXCxDaBX2XSZ0gfZ5X?usp=sharing

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

126
Posts
122
Votes
Terra Padgett
  • Investor
  • Houston, TX
122
Votes |
126
Posts
Terra Padgett
  • Investor
  • Houston, TX
Replied
That is pitiful. It sounds like a classic case of “he say she say”. He says she was never an investor with them. She says she was and had a horrible experience and therefore shared that experience with the public. Now he is trying to sue the technology mediums she used to share her experience. SMH. I’m pretty sure I saw unfavorable threads here on BP about that operator. I know from experience that Invest Clearly verifies that someone is invested with the operator before they allow a review to go live. So if she had posted on Facebook or any other medium out there, are they suing them all? IMO, this just highlights the reason why a platform like Invest Clearly is so needed in the Syndication space.

Loading replies...