Skip to content

Let's keep in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter for timely insights and actionable tips on your real estate journey.

By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions
Followed Discussions Followed Categories Followed People Followed Locations
Managing Your Property
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

User Stats

57
Posts
16
Votes
Jonathan Greer
16
Votes |
57
Posts

Traditional Rentals vs. Co-Living: Which Performs Better?

Jonathan Greer
Posted


I've been having more conversations with investors who are rethinking the traditional "one lease, one tenant" approach—especially as vacancy costs, affordability challenges, and market uncertainty continue to impact returns.

With a traditional rental, one vacancy means the entire property stops producing income.

With a professionally managed room-by-room model, one resident moving out doesn't necessarily mean the home's cash flow stops. The remaining occupied rooms continue generating income while the vacant room is marketed and filled. Technology can also streamline pricing, marketing, resident screening, rent collection, maintenance, and leasing, making the model more scalable than many investors realize.

Of course, it's not the right fit for every property or every market, but I've seen it perform particularly well for larger homes near employment centers, universities, and areas with strong demand from young professionals.

I'm curious what others are seeing:

  • Have you tried room-by-room rentals?
  • What markets have you seen this strategy work best in?
  • If you've considered it but decided against it, what held you back?

Always interested in learning from other investors and operators. Feel free to connect if you'd like to compare notes on different rental strategies.

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

322
Posts
192
Votes
Victor So
  • Real Estate Agent
  • Chicago, IL
192
Votes |
322
Posts
Victor So
  • Real Estate Agent
  • Chicago, IL
Replied
Quote from @Jonathan Greer:


I've been having more conversations with investors who are rethinking the traditional "one lease, one tenant" approach—especially as vacancy costs, affordability challenges, and market uncertainty continue to impact returns.

With a traditional rental, one vacancy means the entire property stops producing income.

With a professionally managed room-by-room model, one resident moving out doesn't necessarily mean the home's cash flow stops. The remaining occupied rooms continue generating income while the vacant room is marketed and filled. Technology can also streamline pricing, marketing, resident screening, rent collection, maintenance, and leasing, making the model more scalable than many investors realize.

Of course, it's not the right fit for every property or every market, but I've seen it perform particularly well for larger homes near employment centers, universities, and areas with strong demand from young professionals.

I'm curious what others are seeing:

  • Have you tried room-by-room rentals?
  • What markets have you seen this strategy work best in?
  • If you've considered it but decided against it, what held you back?

Always interested in learning from other investors and operators. Feel free to connect if you'd like to compare notes on different rental strategies.

I don’t know about other markets but co-living works in the Chicago market (where I invest in). 9 years ago, I started investing in real estate by househacking mainly by renting extra rooms in my properties. Fast forward to today, I run rent by room operations in 8 units. Took some trial and error but I know my market and know what works. I’ve built my own systems and although there are kinks, they run pretty smoothly. DM me if you want to discuss more. 
  • Victor So
business profile image
Victor So Real Estate LLC
5.0 stars
17 Reviews

Loading replies...