Investors who buy land: what's one thing you check that most people don't?

Question

Every experienced land investor seems to have that one thing they always check before making an offer.

Some won't buy without legal access.

Some immediately look at flood maps.

Some care more about surrounding landowners than the property itself.

Others won't touch anything without checking deed history first.

Curious what everyone's "non-negotiable" is before they buy.

What's the one thing that's saved you from making a bad purchase?

Stuart Udis · Answer

I develop in urban neighborhoods where density is generally determined through a combination of lot area and base zoning district. As a result, most investors value land based on buildable units. I personally look much closer at parcels dimensional characteristics. By way of example, a 25x80 parcel is the same lot area as 20x100 but I know I can layout side by side bedrooms in a 25' wide building and overall layout a superior floor plan whether it's a SFH or multi-family. Same zoning, same lot size, but very different design capabilities. I also pay attention to natural grading of a site to see if that could be used advantageously. such as tucking parking underneath a building without a ton of excavation, walk out basements etc.  There's many other items to check as part of diligence before purchasing land but those are two that fly under the radar for many but can unlock significant value.

Jae Shoate · Answer

​Exactly right on the feed vs. record issue. What’s wild is how often a broker feed shows a perfectly viable parcel, but the second you snap the true county boundary onto street-level imagery, you realize the legal property line ends 10 feet short of the actual paved road—or there's a non-negotiable median blocking access. Catching that boundary-vs-reality mismatch in 2 minutes on a desktop saves thousands in wasted preliminary site plans.

Alex Boltenkov · Answer

It isn't about a secret check, it's about the order of operations. Every check has a kill rate. Access and wetlands kill the most deals, so those run first across the whole list. You shrink the pool before touching anything slow or expensive.

Most people research parcels one at a time, pulling every layer for a single property before moving to the next. Flip that. Run one layer across all parcels at once.

As for a specific check most skip: verifying the listing's acreage and legal description against the county record. It sounds basic, but I keep finding parcels where the address on the listing literally does not exist in the assessor system. If the legal description is wrong out of the gate, everything else you check is a waste of time.

Alex Boltenkov · Answer

That aerial-vs-boundary check definitely belongs in the cheap-first tier. It's free and kills dead deals fast before you sink time. I'll add a layer to that. The county GIS parcel layer usually exposes the geometry through REST. You can pull those boundary coordinates programmatically and overlay them against the imagery without having to eyeball every single one. When you're dealing with volume, that turns your manual check from per-parcel minutes into an automated batch step.

Those two listing feed cases you mentioned are the exact same disease as that dead-address parcel I brought up earlier. The feed is never the record. If it's not in the county record, it didn't happen.

Bruce Woodruff · Answer

I'm talking about very rural land....but #1 is WATER!

G. Brian Davis · Answer

It's less about one specific item and more about understanding the downside before I focus on the upside. Every property has risks, but I want to know what they are before I commit. That's why I put so much value on thorough due diligence. It's probably saved me from more bad investments than finding one extra good deal ever has.

Dean Carter · Answer

The 2 biggies for me:

-HOA-In a flood zone

Harveer Singh · Answer

Thanks Jimmy, and the strategy fit point is the one I'd put first too.The way I think about it is rigid on the permanent stuff, flexible on the fixable stuff. Access, topography, what the neighbors can legally do, whether it can be permitted for your intended use, none of that is something you fix later at any price. Bedroom count, clearing, a driveway, those are just money and time.

People do it backwards constantly. They get rigid about acreage and price per acre, which are the two easiest numbers to compare, and stay flexible on the things that actually determine whether the parcel does what they wanted.

The GIS habit is underrated too. Ten minutes on a county parcel viewer answers questions that take three phone calls otherwise, and it's free.

Would be glad to connect.

Harveer Singh · Answer

The order of operations point is the thing most people miss and I think it's because researching one parcel at a time feels more thorough. It isn't, it's just slower. Running one layer across everything and shrinking the pool before you touch anything expensive is obviously right once someone says it out loud.

The legal description check is a good one and I've hit it twice recently. One parcel where two listing feeds showed the same address at $79,900 and $15,000, which usually means at least one of them is pointed at a different piece of dirt. Another where the address on the listing had actually sold two years earlier and what was currently available was a different parcel on the same road entirely.

Cheap check, near the front, kills the ones where nothing else you do would have meant anything.

The one I'd add in the same category is the parcel boundary versus what the aerial photo suggests. People look at a satellite image, see a cleared area and a driveway, and assume both are on the parcel. Overlay the actual boundary and the driveway is sometimes on the neighbor.

Investors who buy land: what's one thing you check that most people don't?

Most Popular Reply