Skip to content

Let's keep in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter for timely insights and actionable tips on your real estate journey.

By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions
Followed Discussions Followed Categories Followed People Followed Locations
Market Trends & Data
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

User Stats

6
Posts
8
Votes
Brandon Yanssens
8
Votes |
6
Posts

Honestly — is buy-and-hold in a market like Youngstown/Mahoning Valley worth the time

Brandon Yanssens
Posted
Looking for honest opinions, not just success stories especially from people investing in secondary Rust Belt markets.   My situation: I’m in my mid-20s, building a small portfolio in the Youngstown, OH / Mahoning Valley area under my own LLC. I still work a W2 for income stability and lending eligibility. My approach has been deliberately conservative: low leverage, slow growth, cash-flow-focused, targeting something like 30 units by 30 as a soft goal rather than a hard deadline. I’ve spent the last several months deep in underwriting — analyzing a quadplex, working through renovation loan structures (HomeStyle, FHA 203k), modeling stabilized cash flow on a 3-property portfolio, and pursuing an off-market distressed property. So I’m not asking this as someone who hasn’t done the work.   The question I keep circling: When I actually run the numbers, buy-and-hold cash flow in my market — $150-400/month per door after debt service, taxes, insurance, and reserves — doesn’t look like a path to “successful.” It looks like a solid, slow wealth-building tool: principal paydown, modest appreciation, tax benefits, optionality down the road. Valuable, but not transformative on any timeline I can see without dramatically more leverage or scale than I’m comfortable with.   So I’m trying to get a real read from people who’ve been doing this longer: 1. Has buy-and-hold in a market like mine (cash-flow-over-appreciation, lower price points, slower rent growth) ever actually been your primary wealth engine — or is it always secondary to something else (a business, syndications, development, a W2/1099 income spike)? 2. For people investing in similar Rust Belt / secondary markets — did you eventually have to increase leverage, scale up to bigger multifamily, or leave the market to hit real wealth-building numbers? Or did slow-and-steady genuinely compound the way it’s supposed to? 3. Is “30 by 30” or similar aggressive unit-count goals realistic on a low-leverage, self-funded path — or does that math only work if you’re willing to take on more risk than I have been?   I’m not looking to be talked out of real estate I think it has a real role in my plan. I’m trying to figure out if I’m using it for the wrong job. Appreciate any honest pushback, especially from people further down this road than I am.

Loading replies...