What actually happens after your offer/LOI is accepted?

Question

I'm trying to understand the acquisition process beyond the numbers.

Suppose you submit an LOI, the seller accepts your price and terms, and you move toward a purchase contract.

What are the major things experienced investors are doing during that period?

I mean:

• Due diligence
• Financing
• Property inspection
• Rent roll/lease verification
• Title
• Environmental
• Insurance
• Appraisal
• Reviewing historical financials

Due diligence

Financing

Property inspection

Rent roll/lease verification

Title

Environmental

Insurance

Appraisal

Reviewing historical financials

Which of these tends to uncover the issues that actually cause investors to renegotiate or walk away?

For those who have done a lot of acquisitions, what is something you wish you had learned about the process earlier?

Brad Sicoli · Answer

LOI is a multi family term and we really don't have loi's in residential. The most comparable thing would be a pre approval letter for 1-4 units which is what I trade now. Most 1-4 deals I do have a 14 day due diligence period but that is negotiable and often extended.

my previous job was a regional manager for a multi family property management company. When we had a client, usually an asset manager or gp, go under contract, the procedure was to walk every unit and classify it as easy medium or heavy turn for when it eventually goes vacant. We would ask for all the normal reports but I think the most important are the income statement going back 12 months, the rent roll, and the delinquency report. I would want notes on where the late tenants are at in the eviction process or if there is a payment plan. I would begin uploading all tenant info onto our company's crm, obviously you'll need every lease and I'd also ask for every application of each tenant. If you have assigned parking you'll need a parking list too. You also need to ask for any vendor contracts such as lawn care or laundry room service. I'd also ask for a list of vendors and save those contacts somewhere.

the unit walks involved taking notes and pictures. Notes like, "dog present" are helpful.

once under contract you or your agent/broker should contact your lender to start the appraisal process. If your appraisal comes in low that means you're paying too much and you should walk away. don't be tempted to contribute more. Either the seller lowers their price to the appraised price or it's over. Don't overpay.

That's also the time to hire inspectors. I do not hire inspectors anymore but I did for my first few deals. It's up to you how much you want to spend on inspections but as you gain experience you'll probably do fewer inspections. In multi family it seemed like renegotiating revolved around over inspecting and using inspection reports to beat the seller up over price. That also happens in 1-4 deals but less so. I want to maintain a reputation of someone who does not reneg so I just make as is offers and waive all inspections, usually.

almost anything can be fixed so a discovery of something bad should be a change in price only, not something that causes you to walk away, imo.

Also, don't forget to get a credit at closing for security deposits. Most agents are bad and they will miss that.

something that I wished I learned earlier is to prioritize location and unit type as primary factors.

Ashish Acharya · Answer

Chidiebere, once the LOI is accepted, I’d treat the next phase as proving that the deal you underwrote is actually the deal you’re buying.

A lot of problems show up in three places: the physical condition, the income/expense history, and the legal/operational details.

On the physical side, I’d want a thorough inspection plus specialist reviews where needed for roof, HVAC, plumbing, electrical, structural, sewer, and environmental issues. On the financial side, I’d reconcile the rent roll to actual deposits, review leases, concessions, delinquency, bad debt, utility responsibility, repairs, taxes, insurance, and CapEx history instead of relying only on the seller’s summary.

I’d also look closely at title, zoning, permits, code issues, insurance availability, and whether the appraisal and lender underwriting still support the deal after diligence.

From the tax side, I’d make sure the purchase price allocation, closing costs, planned improvements, and placed-in-service timing are documented correctly from the start. If it’s a larger multifamily acquisition, cost segregation may also be worth evaluating once the property is placed in service, but only after confirming the deal still makes sense operationally.

The issues that usually justify a renegotiation or walk-away are the ones that change the economics materially: hidden CapEx, overstated income, understated expenses, title/zoning problems, insurance surprises, or financing that no longer works.

Feel free to DM me, I’d be happy to send over a few resources that might help you build a stronger acquisition checklist.

Diana Khan · Answer

@Chidiebere Stanley Ogah, one thing I’ve learned from working on real estate transactions is that after the LOI is accepted, I pay just as much attention to the contract calendar as I do to the property. Once the purchase agreement is signed, the buyer’s rights usually depend on very specific deadlines for inspections, financing, title review, document review, and termination. I’ve seen buyers find a real problem during due diligence, but the bigger issue became whether they still had the contractual right to do something about it.

That is why I would want the purchase agreement to clearly say what the seller has to provide, how much access the buyer gets, when objections have to be made, what happens if the information is different from what was represented, and when the deposit becomes at risk. To me, due diligence is not just finding problems. It is making sure you still have the right to renegotiate or walk away when you find them. I like that you are trying to understand the process beyond just the numbers, and I’d be glad to stay connected as you learn more about acquisitions. I’m licensed in Maryland, so anything specific to Missouri should still be reviewed by Missouri counsel.

Chidiebere Stanley Ogah · Answer

Thanks for the distinction. I thought of the diligence period mainly as the time to discover problems, but your point about the contract determining what one can actually do with those problems changes how I see it.

When reviewing a purchase agreement, what deadlines or provisions do you think buyers commonly overlook and it's impact?

Diana Khan · Answer

@Chidiebere Stanley Ogah, exactly. The ones I see buyers overlook most are the deadlines tied to inspections, title objections, financing, and when the earnest money becomes nonrefundable. I’ve seen buyers find a real issue, but by the time they raise it, the deadline to object or terminate has already passed. Another big one is the seller’s document deadline. If the seller is supposed to provide leases, financials, reports, or other records, I want to know what happens if those documents come in late or incomplete.

I also pay close attention to notice requirements and cure periods. Sometimes the contract gives the buyer a right, but that right only works if notice is given the right way and on time. That is why I tell buyers not to just calendar the closing date. Calendar every deadline that could affect your deposit, your ability to renegotiate, or your right to walk away. Those are usually the dates that matter most when something unexpected comes up. Since you are in Missouri, I would still have Missouri counsel review the actual contract language.

Chidiebere Stanley Ogah · Answer

Thank you Michael. You're right about trying to disprove the deal. A deal shouldn't only work if things go well but should be able to survive downsides too. But when you’re rebuilding the deal from verified information as you said, what’s usually the first source you go after? The rent roll, leases, bank statements, T-12, or something else?

Michael Eskenasy · Answer

The part I’d learn earlier is that once the LOI is accepted, your job changes from proving the deal works to trying to disprove it before your contingencies expire.

The items that usually move price or kill deals aren’t the checklist items by themselves — it’s when several of them reconcile badly.

I’d be running these in parallel:

Physical: roof, structure, plumbing, electrical, HVAC, sewer, deferred maintenance, unit interiors.

Financial: rebuild the trailing financials from source documents, compare bank deposits to reported income, test expenses against invoices, taxes, payroll, utilities and contracts.

Rent roll: match every unit to a lease, payment history, concessions, deposits, delinquencies and actual occupied status. Don’t assume “occupied” means economically occupied.

Legal/title: title, survey, zoning, permits, code issues, easements, outstanding violations and whether the current use is actually legal.

Environmental/insurance: Phase I where appropriate, claims history, current insurability and — increasingly important — what the replacement premium does to your NOI.

Financing: keep the lender moving immediately. Appraisal, lender underwriting and your diligence need to converge before deadlines start controlling you.

Then I’d rebuild the entire deal using verified information instead of the seller’s package.

The biggest renegotiations usually happen when verified NOI is lower than represented, capex is materially higher than expected, collections don’t match the rent roll, insurance/taxes reset harder than modeled, or financing changes the economics.

The lesson I’d emphasize: don’t diligence departments independently. Reconcile everything against everything else. The lease says one thing, the rent roll says another, the bank deposits say a third — that mismatch is often where the real story is.

If you’re working through an actual acquisition, send me the basic deal info. I’m happy to show you how I’d structure the diligence process and pressure-test it before the clock runs out.

Chidiebere Stanley Ogah · Answer

When you say “under the hood,” is there a particular diligence item or method you’ve found or use particularly good at exposing problems that weren’t obvious from the seller’s package?

Charles Seaman · Answer

@Chidiebere Stanley Ogah In my experience, the issues that typically cause investors to renegotiate or walk away are undisclosed major CapEx items, misrepresentations of occupancy or collections, or financing terms coming in less favorable than expected.  You can conduct as much diligence as you want on the front end, but there will always be some unknowns that you won't truly know until you get "under the hood."  The key is to be as thorough as possible during the due diligence period to hopefully uncover any major issues before you acquire the property.  It's better to lose some risk capital and walk away from a deal than to acquire it and have your asset quickly become a liability.

What actually happens after your offer/LOI is accepted?

Most Popular Reply