How to Gift Properties to Your Family (Not the IRS)

by |

This article is an excerpt from The Book on Tax Strategies for the Savvy Real Estate Investor by Amanda Han and Matthew MacFarland. Pick up a copy from the BiggerPockets Bookstore!

It had been so hard for Jane to watch her dad’s health deteriorate over the past few years. At eighty-seven years old, her dad was getting increasingly weaker physically by the day. Although he seemed to still be doing well mentally, Jane started having concerns about some of the decisions he had been making.

About eight years earlier, Jane’s dad had had his first stroke. He was no longer able to take care of himself and live independently, so Jane hired an in-home caregiver, Patti, who moved into her dad’s home.

Though Patti needed some time to adjust to her new job, she adapted well and quickly learned how to care for Jane’s dad. Patti figured out how to make him laugh, how to convince him to take his medicines, and most importantly, how to handle him when his temper flared. Jane was glad they got along so well, because her dad was definitely not the easiest person to deal with at times.

The arrangement seemed to be going well, and Jane never had any worries, knowing her dad was in good hands. That was until a year ago, when her dad announced that he was in love with Patti, and the two were planning on getting
married. This did not sit well with Jane. Not only was Patti almost 45 years younger than her dad, but Jane had also never seen any kind of love connection between the two. As far as she could tell, their relationship was strictly professional. Jane was not sure what Patti’s true intentions were toward her father.

He owned quite a few assets, including a commercial building and some smaller real estate along the coast. But even if money was not the reason behind it, Jane felt that that sort of relationship between them was unprofessional.

After the wedding announcement, things started to get worse. Jane could not get over the unease she felt about the union and tried to speak with Patti in private about her concerns. As soon as the conversation was over, Patti ran to Jane’s dad to complain to him about his daughter. After that, Jane and Patti didn’t speak to each other, and Jane’s relationship with her dad became a bit rocky.


Related: How to Use Flexibility to Dramatically Reduce (or Even Eliminate) Your Tax Bill

From that point on, Jane felt awkward around the two of them. She visited multiple times a week, but the awkwardness had changed things, and she almost felt as though she wasn’t welcome in her dad’s home anymore. Patti made herself scarce whenever Jane came over, and her dad remained focused on trying to get the two to reconcile. It was obvious from the way her dad acted that Patti complained about Jane quite often. Although Jane didn’t know whose side her dad was on, considering his peacemaking efforts, one thing she knew for sure was that Patti considered her an enemy.

This is why Jane was so surprised when her dad called her to his bedside one day and told her he planned on giving her his commercial property. Her dad had purchased this property back in the late 1980s for just over $56,000. He didn’t fully explain why he wanted to gift the property to Jane, saying only that he wanted her to have it.

Jane was filled with mixed emotions. On one hand, she was happy that her dad seemed as sharp as ever and was making this gift to ensure that he had set something aside for Jane. On the other hand, Jane saw how fragile her dad had become, and conversations like the one about the property reinforced that he would not be with her forever. Her dad indicated that he had already contacted his attorney and would be transferring the property into Jane’s name as early as the following week.

Jane had never been savvy about money or investments. This would be the first time she owned an investment property, and she wanted to make sure she did everything correctly. She had heard about people forming LLCs or corporations to hold real estate, so she wanted to see about doing the same.

Sitting across from us in the conference room, Jane started telling her story from the beginning, sharing not only about the gift she was receiving, but also about the dynamics between her, her dad, and his caregiver Patti. At the end of the story, Jane reiterated that receiving this gift from her dad was something very special and she wanted to make sure everything was handled properly.

When Jane finished speaking, she immediately knew something was wrong by the concerned looks on our faces.

“You said your dad bought this property for $56,000. What is it worth today?” we asked.

“I am not positive what it would sell for today,” Jane responded. “But I do know we had an appraisal done a year and a half ago, and it was valued at just over $1.1M.”

“And has the gift already occurred?” we asked. “Did he already transfer the title to you?”

Jane hesitantly shook her head no. “Wonderful,” we both laughed loudly. “You could have lost out on a big tax-saving opportunity if your dad had already gifted the property to you.”

Jane suddenly began to panic. She had not even realized there were taxes she had to worry about. After all, she had always been under the impression that you did not have to pay taxes on a gift.

Receiving a Gift Versus Receiving an Inheritance

Although Jane was right that she did not have to pay taxes on a gift she received, but that was not what we were talking about. We were referring to capital gains taxes. You see, if her dad simply gifted the property to Jane, she would receive her dad’s basis in the property. Because her dad purchased the property so long ago for only $56,000, he had written off most of the purchase price through his depreciation over the years.

After looking at her dad’s old tax returns, we noticed that the remaining tax basis on the property was only $16,000. If this property were “gifted” to Jane, her tax basis in the property would also be $16,000. If she were to sell this property down the road for $1.1M, though, she would have a gain of $1,084,000 that she would have to pay capital gains taxes on. This could end up costing her as much as $401,000 in taxes ($1.084M x ~37%).

On the other hand, if the property remained with her dad, and he kept it until he passed away, Jane could inherit the property and get a “basis step-up” to the property’s fair market value. In this example, if the fair market value of the property at the time of her dad’s death was $1.1M, Jane’s tax basis would be $1.1M instead of $16,000. Using the inheritance strategy, if Jane decided to sell the property for $1.1M even just one day after inheriting it, she would pay zero taxes on that transaction.

The difference between her dad gifting her the property today versus waiting to pass it on to her after his death as inheritance meant a potential tax savings of $401,000.

Jane was speechless. This was not something she had ever thought might be an issue. She loved the idea of saving such a large amount in taxes, but she did have her concerns—and not just about herself. She also had to think about her dad’s caregiver Patti. If Jane didn’t accept her dad’s gift before the wedding, she was not sure the property would even pass to her after her dad passed away. If her dad and Patti got married, Patti could ultimately own all her dad’s assets as his surviving wife.

Related: The Latest Tax Reform Update and What It Means for Real Estate Investors

Irrevocable Trust

Working with Jane and her family attorney, we recommended setting up an irrevocable trust with retained powers. This was a strategy to help Jane get the best of both worlds by creating some protection for the property transfer, while at the same time minimizing future taxes.

With an irrevocable trust, her dad could move the property into the trust right away while maintaining certain rights. Upon his passing, the property could then be transferred from the trust to Jane, and she would get the step-up basis to fair market value on the date her dad passed away.

A common mistake we see is that as people get older, they try to quickly move assets out of their name and into their kids’ names. As you can see in Jane and her dad’s situation, this may not always be a good idea. There are times when moving an asset to beneficiaries before one’s death could make sense, but at other times, it can be a costly decision.

This can be a tricky decision, especially with respect to real estate. For example, it is possible to use 1031 exchange strategies to permanently defer taxes on your properties. How? Simply die while owning it!

Any questions about gifting properties?

Ask them below—and don’t forget to get expert tax tips in time for tax day from The Book on Tax Strategies for the Savvy Real Estate Investor!

About Author

Amanda Han

Amanda is a CPA specializing in tax strategies for real estate, self-directed investing, and individual tax planning with over 18 years’ experience. She is also a real estate investor of over 10 years with a focus on long-term hold residential and multi-family assets across multiple states. Formerly a tax advisor at the prestigious accounting firm Deloitte in the Lead Tax Group, focusing on tax strategies for the real estate industry and high net worth individuals, and at an international Fortune 500 Company in the high-tech industry in the Corporate Tax department, Amanda’s goal is to help investors with strategies designed to supercharge their wealth building. Amanda’s highly rated book Tax Strategies for the Savvy Real Estate Investor is amongst Amazon’s best seller list. A frequent contributor, speaker, and educator to some of the nation’s top investment and self-directed IRA companies, Amanda has been featured in prominent publications including Money Magazine,, and Amanda was a speaker at Talks at Google and is a 40 under 40 honoree by CPA Practice Advisor, showcased amongst the best and brightest talent in the accounting profession. Her firm Keystone CPA, Inc. was awarded a two-time winner of the Top CPA of Orange County Award by OC Metro Magazine. She is certified by the CA State Board of Accountancy and is a member of the prestigious American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) with clients across the nation.


  1. Patrick Liska

    Amanda, good Article, i hold my properties and have in my will that all properties that i own should be passed to my children upon my passing. They are all held in separate llc’s and do not know if that is a problem – my attorney i used to write the will said it would not, but i want to make sure they do not have to wait and go through Probate, do you recommend setting up an irrevocable trust in my instance ? and would a property be able to be sold out of the irrevocable trust if i had to sell it ?

  2. Jerry W.

    Probably one of the best articles from a legal and tax standpoint I have ever read on BP. It also is not written from the “call me as soon as you read this” that some of the recent blogs seem to promote. thank you for taking the time to write this. it is very clear and concise as well as legally correct.

  3. Courtney Richardson

    Good analysis of transfer basis and stepped up basis. My only concern is that the 37% tax rate is too high. Because the dad purchased the property over a year ago, the tax would be approximately 20% because that would be the highest long term capital gains rate. 37% is the highest ordinary income tax rate. I think you make a really good point that you need to go through the tax implications before the transaction happens, once the bell is rung. If the transfer did happen and she had transferred instead of stepped up basis, a Section 1031 exchange would defer the gain.

  4. Alvin L.

    I have a similar situation going on where a property of the same value as you mentioned would be gifted to my wife. Is there a way to transfer/gift the property to a child in the best manner possible before passing away so that the child can use the equity/home as they please (whether it be cash out refinancing/HELOCs)?

    • Mayra Stapleton

      Similar to Alvin, My mom wants to gift some property to her grandchildren as well before her passing due to religious beliefs. besides gifting after death is there a way around to gift while still alive and not have them be taxed at step up basis?

    • Kurt Stresau

      Alvin and Mayra,

      I would recommend talking to a good accountant/CPA. Remember that giving while alive is subject to an annual exclusion. The last I checked (a few years ago) it was subject to a $14,000 annual exclusion. That means that you can give someone $14K every year without it being subject to taxes. There is a method of doing a 5-year lumped sum (AKA $70K) gift, but then you cannot give to the same person for the 5 years without breaking the limit. If a couple is giving to a child, each half of the couple could give up to the limit. Thus, two parents could give a single child a $140K house, as long as they didn’t give for the next 5 years. There is paperwork on this (don’t know what), and you need a professional to set it up right.

      Another option might be to put a piece of property into a C-corporation and give the child $14K worth of shares/ownership every year until they owned the whole corporation. This would be a way to give fractional ownership on a progressive basis and might be more appropriate for more expensive properties.

      • Keith Knobloch

        Confirm all of this with a CPA or estate planning attorney that knows your state! I’m pretty sure the federal gifting limits are up to $15,000/yr now, making Kurt’s suggestions a little quicker/easier due to a bigger “lump” option. Your state may also offer a TODD (Transfer on Death Deed), which will allow you to place your beneficiary (or beneficiaries) right on the deed to the property. You maintain 100% of the control until the day you die, but then the beneficiary gets immediate ownership and avoids probate (and possibly the need for a more expensive trust), and I’m pretty sure they still get the benefit of the stepped up cost basis in case they want to sell.

  5. pearce g.

    Amanda, great article, but I’m curious about teaching my kids the wealth-building power of real estate while I’m still around. In the public record, I see a lot of transactions where title is passed from one family member to another for nominal consideration of say $5. Wouldn’t an equity transfer in excess of the gift exclusion limit be taxable? Or what if I give my kids “family friendly” terms…e.g. credit them a 50K down payment and finance the rest on a 150K property I own outright?

      • Kurt Stresau

        Remember that there is a “lower bound” on the inheritance tax. If you die and leave someone $1, it’s not taxed at all. I haven’t checked recently as it doesn’t apply to me (not in that league), but the limit used to be $5M. So if his total estate falls below whatever the current threshold is, it’s completely exempt from an inheritance tax standpoint. So…move it into a trust to make sure that his wishes are honored even if he suffers mental degradation, but the ACTUAL transfer occurs after his death. The property basis takes advantage of the one-time-stepup on his date of passing, then that basis is subject to the $5M tax-free cap.

        It’s important that large gifts during the living years (in excess of the yearly tax-free gift limit) will count against (and reduce) the $5M cap.

        For people with medium-large asset pools (and many potential heirs), it is possible to give incremental gifts in your final years and leave the balance via trusts subject to the above. This is a PRIMARY reason to have an estate planning attorney familiar with tax law helping with your affairs after age….60 or so.

  6. steven W.

    Great article, and timely for me. I recently (after telling myself I needed to get something in place for….forever) set up a simple will to make sure my only (adult) offspring was able to receive my estate without too much trouble. I had heard about the step-up basis, so it sounds like that’s not an issue in my particular case, however, I’m planning on doing a Living trust at some point, with the idea that I can more easily pass on the properties of the estate without necessarily having to force transacting the homes (many are still mortgaged). Another leg of my strategy is to title the out-of-state properties into an LLC owned by the trust, to (hopefully) eliminate the multiple probates – is this something you think would work to protect the assets adequately?

Leave A Reply

Pair a profile with your post!

Create a Free Account


Log In Here