Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime

Let's keep in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter for timely insights and actionable tips on your real estate journey.

By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions
×
Take Your Forum Experience
to the Next Level
Create a free account and join over 3 million investors sharing
their journeys and helping each other succeed.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
Already a member?  Login here
Followed Discussions Followed Categories Followed People Followed Locations
Starting Out
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 23 hours ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

113
Posts
100
Votes
Christopher Rubio#1 Starting Out Contributor
  • Investor
100
Votes |
113
Posts

Small Multi-Family vs. Single-Family for a First Out-of-State Deal?

Christopher Rubio#1 Starting Out Contributor
  • Investor
Posted

Hi BP community,

I’m a new investor based in California, looking to start my portfolio through out-of-state investing. My target is the $80K–$125K range in landlord-friendly markets with steady job growth. I’m most interested in BRRRR and buy-and-hold rentals, and I keep going back and forth between starting with a small multi-family (duplex/triplex/fourplex) or a single-family rental.

Here’s where I’m stuck:

  • SFRs seem easier to manage and may be less intimidating for a first deal, but the cash flow might be tighter.
  • Small multis could bring stronger cash flow and efficiency, but I’ve heard they can be tougher to finance, and vacancies or tenant issues could hit harder if I don’t have a solid team yet.

For those of you who’ve been down this road already:

  • Which one did you start with, and why?
  • Looking back, would you do it the same way?
  • What do you think is the best path for someone investing out of state for the first time?

I’d love to hear your experiences and lessons learned — it’ll help me take action with more clarity and confidence.

Thanks in advance,
Christopher

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

2,963
Posts
5,280
Votes
Steve K.
  • Realtor
  • Boulder, CO
5,280
Votes |
2,963
Posts
Steve K.
  • Realtor
  • Boulder, CO
Replied

$80-150k properties are not going to have high enough rents to cover operating costs over time. Even if your magic spreadsheet shows $200/ month positive, over time you will lose money due to the rent not being enough to cover maintenance, repairs and capex on a property, and that’s not even factoring in the inevitable tenant or PM issues. Rule #1 is location location location. Save up until you can afford a property in CA would be my advice. Ideally 20 minutes max from where you live. Good luck! 

Loading replies...