Updated about 23 hours ago on . Most recent reply

Small Multi-Family vs. Single-Family for a First Out-of-State Deal?
Hi BP community,
I’m a new investor based in California, looking to start my portfolio through out-of-state investing. My target is the $80K–$125K range in landlord-friendly markets with steady job growth. I’m most interested in BRRRR and buy-and-hold rentals, and I keep going back and forth between starting with a small multi-family (duplex/triplex/fourplex) or a single-family rental.
Here’s where I’m stuck:
- SFRs seem easier to manage and may be less intimidating for a first deal, but the cash flow might be tighter.
- Small multis could bring stronger cash flow and efficiency, but I’ve heard they can be tougher to finance, and vacancies or tenant issues could hit harder if I don’t have a solid team yet.
For those of you who’ve been down this road already:
- Which one did you start with, and why?
- Looking back, would you do it the same way?
- What do you think is the best path for someone investing out of state for the first time?
I’d love to hear your experiences and lessons learned — it’ll help me take action with more clarity and confidence.
Thanks in advance,
Christopher
Most Popular Reply

$80-150k properties are not going to have high enough rents to cover operating costs over time. Even if your magic spreadsheet shows $200/ month positive, over time you will lose money due to the rent not being enough to cover maintenance, repairs and capex on a property, and that’s not even factoring in the inevitable tenant or PM issues. Rule #1 is location location location. Save up until you can afford a property in CA would be my advice. Ideally 20 minutes max from where you live. Good luck!