Skip to content
×
PRO Members Get
Full Access
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime.
Level up your investing with Pro
Explore exclusive tools and resources to start, grow, or optimize your portfolio.
~$5,000+ potential annual savings on vetted partner products
10+ deal analysis calculators with ready-to-share reports
Lawyer-reviewed leases for every state ($99/package value)
Pro badge for priority visibility in the Forums

Let's keep in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter for timely insights and actionable tips on your real estate journey.

By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions
Followed Discussions Followed Categories Followed People Followed Locations
Starting Out
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 4 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

100
Posts
26
Votes
Owen Thornton
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Charlotte, NC
26
Votes |
100
Posts

SFH vs MFH - strategy and debate

Owen Thornton
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Charlotte, NC
Posted

Hello! I found many people like to debate or go dab out real estate in different ways.

SFH seem to be the ones that allow for a fluid transaction, seem to be easier to sell, etc.

MFH seem to help multiply units quickly.

What is your take on these, in use for cash flow and appreciation?

Do you prefer going for cheaper SFH or more expensive, same with the MFH?

What do you like to see? Do you like to leverage money more on either of them… or just the same.

Also side question: would you rather sacrifice cash flow and have more appreciation or go for cash flow and have less appreciation…

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

15,750
Posts
10,951
Votes
Will Barnard
  • Developer
  • Santa Clarita, CA
10,951
Votes |
15,750
Posts
Will Barnard
  • Developer
  • Santa Clarita, CA
ModeratorReplied

Regardless if it is MF or SFR, I always look for value add opportunities, without that, I am likely not interested.

I will also point out that each investor has his/her own goals, desires, skill sets and as such, there is no right or wrong answer here.

SFR Pros - Financing is often easier. Barrier to entry easier. Able to move in as primary residence. Ease of selling on MLS. Tenants often stay longer as a SFR is more family friendly than a multi unit. Market appreciation is often better (assuming you buy in the right areas). Larger buyers pool a exit. Easier to 1031 exchange into something else. Cons - If you have a vacancy, you are 100% vacant! Low economies of scale. Higher property management costs (typically). Higher costs to place tenants.

MF Pros - Economies of scale. If you have a quad and you lose 1 tenant, you are at 25% vacancy rather than 100% with SFR. PM costs lower. Ability to add other income streams like coin laundry, covered parking, storage, etc. MF Negatives - Smaller buyers pool, more difficult to sell, depending on your market, lower market appreciation compared to SFR. Higher turn over ratio of tenants.

Would I give up cash flow for more appreciation? Depends on my existing goals but yes. I look at mid west properties for cash flow vs CA properties with negative or break even cash flow and over a 10 year period, the CA property beats it each time. That said, each strategy has its own hurdles and each investor must decide which hurdles they are willing to jump over to get to the finish line. Again, there is NO right or wrong answer with this question.

Loading replies...