Skip to content

Let's keep in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter for timely insights and actionable tips on your real estate journey.

By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions
Followed Discussions Followed Categories Followed People Followed Locations
Buying & Selling Real Estate
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 12 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

92
Posts
11
Votes
Arthur D.
  • Investor
  • Brooklyn, NY
11
Votes |
92
Posts

market value vs effective market value

Arthur D.
  • Investor
  • Brooklyn, NY
Posted

just wondering what is the difference? In simple terms.

To which one should I apply 70% rule?

Thanks, Arthur

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

1,980
Posts
948
Votes
Bryan L.
  • Residential Real Estate Agent
  • Cookeville, TN
948
Votes |
1,980
Posts
Bryan L.
  • Residential Real Estate Agent
  • Cookeville, TN
Replied

Yes, use the true market value, not something that's related to "assessed value". And I take it a step further. I try to look at a market value at which the property will sell fairly fast. For example, if my comps show a range of 130 - 140, I will use 130 in the formula (or maybe even 125). Another thing to consider is price points. A house with comps at 105 - 110 should be listed at 99,900 to sell fast. A 105 or 110 list price sucks for any listing whether it be an investment property or not. Finally, I also consider seller concessions. In my area it is common that the seller would pay about $4000 of the buyer's closing costs.

Loading replies...