Prop fully depreciated and paid off -- pull equity out and buy another?

Prop fully depreciated and paid off -- pull equity out and buy another?

Member since 2024 · 69 posts · 25 votes
I'm getting ahead of myself here, but I want to at least start thinking about this situation...

My parents have a commercial property that is fully paid off and full depreciated.  (If it's not fully depreciated, it's pretty darn close, and the amount left isn't going to move the needle in terms of offsetting income.)

What is the best strategy here?  
-Refi, pull cash out, purchase another property.  New property means there's depreciation to offset the rental income. Of course the math has to work out where their net income is the same or higher.  
-Refi, pull cash out, and sit on it (well invest it in low risk investments)
-Sell the property and 1031 to a new property where you can depreciate
-Do nothing, why create more work?

Any other suggestions?
0Reply
210 views

Most Popular Reply

Chris SeveneyBusiness Member
Moderator
Investor · VA · Member since 2015 · 21k+ posts · 19k+ votes
8mo

All of these are options but its really difficult to analyze someones situation with very limited data. If the current property is performing well and you can get equity out of it, that is what I would do. You could do a 1031 as well which could let you tap into more of that equity, but it also depends if its $200k of equity or $20M of equity in the property. 

A lot of unknowns to really give any type of response that could be used constructively.

7e investments53 Reviews
See this reply in the discussion

14 Replies

Jump to latestLatest
  • Chris SeveneyBusiness Member
    Moderator
    Investor · VA · Member since 2015 · 21k+ posts · 19k+ votes
    8mo

    All of these are options but its really difficult to analyze someones situation with very limited data. If the current property is performing well and you can get equity out of it, that is what I would do. You could do a 1031 as well which could let you tap into more of that equity, but it also depends if its $200k of equity or $20M of equity in the property. 

    A lot of unknowns to really give any type of response that could be used constructively.

    7e investments53 Reviews
  • Ronald RohdePro Member
    Attorney · Dallas, TX · Member since 2016 · 5k+ posts · 2k+ votes
    8mo

    Need some more information, what are actual numbers? lease term? Asset type?

  • Investor · Las Vegas, NV · Member since 2013 · 8k+ posts · 10k+ votes
    8mo

    Depreciation is a constant. So it’s the same in year 39 (because it’s a commercial property not residential.) as it was in year 1. It’s great your parents were able to hang on to a property so long. But unless you’re almost to year 40 this isn’t a reason to sell/exchange

    If they do an exchange they will only be able to depreciate 1/40th of the building difference. So. Unless they plan to buy something worth twice as much, that makes at least twice as much, the exchange won’t really help. Even that would only result in half as much depreciation on twice as much income. To get as much depreciation shelter as they currently have. They would literally have to spend twice as much and yet only make the same income, and that’s not a good plan. 

    You could do a cash out refi for money if that’s tight, but it will reduce your income obviously. You probably have a very low ROE but if they have a “known quantity” in their current property. Honestly it’s pry time to hold until death and all the taxes go away. If they bought at 30 years old and are 70+ are they really interested in upsetting a working income stream? Unless they “need” more money to live on I think you’re letting a small amount of tax savings cloud your judgment. 

    Imagine they bought the property 40 years ago for $400k so today it’s worth $1.6-$3.2m) (3.5-7% annual growth.) Assuming the property was 80% of the value. They’ve been depreciation 2.5% of 80% of $400k. Around $8k per year. So they save $2-3k a year in taxes? That’s a reason to have 5-10% in selling in buying costs? ($100-$200k) That would involve flushing all the depreciation savings they took over 40 years  down the drain in one day. 

  • Member since 2024 · 69 posts · 25 votes
    8mo
    Okay here's some background:
    -Property is worth ~$1.4-1.5m based on estimates from potential listing agents
    -Rent is $7250 a month
    -6.5 years left on current lease with 2% annual increases; tenant has asked for another 5 year option to be added
    -This is a gross lease, so parents are responsible for the roof, prop tax, etc.
    -Property is fully depreciated & no loan on it

    My thoughts are:
    -no tax advantage currently
    -not leveraging equity

    So, either 1031 into something that's NNN and flows about the same after mortgage so parents have spending cash.  This would then provide depreciation benefits, especially if a cost segregation is done on the property.  Potentially offsetting all rental income for quite awhile.  Maybe a $2m property.

    Or, refi with cash out and use the cash for a smaller additional property. Say cash out $500k, and find a $1m property.  Get the depreciation here to offset rental income for both properties.

    But, is the juice worth the squeeze?  I think I may be over analyzing things...

    From my parents' perspective, the current rental income is adequate for their needs.  They don't need more. 

    I think I may be being greedy for them trying to be tax efficient and leverage idle equity.  And get them more spending cash -- so my dad can buy more frivolous things!  I just feel that if we could offset some of that income with depreciation, it would increase their spending power.  Even if the net rental income is the same, being able to depreciate say $30k a year would make a difference.
      
  • Investor · Las Vegas, NV · Member since 2013 · 8k+ posts · 10k+ votes
    8mo

    If they sold for $1.5M after selling costs and bought a $2M NNN property. That would provide maybe $400k of fresh property to depreciate? (They don't get to depreciate the 1.5M again.). So they could claim 1/40th of $400k or $10k/yr and save $3k a year in taxes? If they only pay 2% in selling costs including commissions and transfer taxes it would take 10 years to break even.

    If they can generate a greater return than the borrowing costs then the $500k cash out isn’t a horrible idea.  

    Ps. 2 NNN concerns from someone who has researched but never bought/owned. 1) The returns from national tenants is generally pretty low. 2) They often trade hands based on cap rates like a bond. This means as the lease starts to expire the property value can decline, A LOT. This might be a $500k property trading at $2M because dollar store or Starbucks is paying the rent. But even the biggest names close stores. I watched a video showing big name NNN's trading tens to hundreds of thousands lower than recent purchase price. This is especially dangerous with franchises where the franchisee can go out of business much easier than a corporate store. Good luck.

    • Member since 2024 · 69 posts · 25 votes
      8mo
      Quote from @Bill B.:

      If they sold for $1.5M after selling costs and bought a $2M NNN property. That would provide maybe $400k of fresh property to depreciate? (They don't get to depreciate the 1.5M again.). So they could claim 1/40th of $400k or $10k/yr and save $3k a year in taxes? If they only pay 2% in selling costs including commissions and transfer taxes it would take 10 years to break even.

      If they can generate a greater return than the borrowing costs then the $500k cash out isn’t a horrible idea.  

      Ps. 2 NNN concerns from someone who has researched but never bought/owned. 1) The returns from national tenants is generally pretty low. 2) They often trade hands based on cap rates like a bond. This means as the lease starts to expire the property value can decline, A LOT. This might be a $500k property trading at $2M because dollar store or Starbucks is paying the rent. But even the biggest names close stores. I watched a video showing big name NNN's trading tens to hundreds of thousands lower than recent purchase price. This is especially dangerous with franchises where the franchisee can go out of business much easier than a corporate store. Good luck.


      Oh, I wasn't aware you lose $1.5m worth of depreciation.  Interesting. Question in regard to that. If they bought the building at $400k, do you deduct the $400 from the $2m so you'd have $1.6m to depreciate?  Or is it based on the sale price?
  • Investor · Fairfax, VA · Member since 2015 · 1k+ posts · 801 votes
    8mo

    what is their annual net income on this property after taxes, roof, insurance, etc.

  • Eric FernwoodBusiness Member
    Realtor · Las Vegas, NV · Member since 2014 · 996 posts · 1k+ votes
    8mo

    Hello @Bob Dole,

    My recommendation is to decide the best move based on achieving their financial goal. If the goal is long-term financial independence, this requires a rental income that meets the following requirements:

    • The income must increase faster than inflation. Only if income increases faster than inflation will you have the additional dollars needed to pay for future price increases.
    • The income must last throughout your lifetime. How long the income lasts largely depends on the city where the property is located. The city defines all long-term income characteristics. The most important factors for most locations are that personal income is rising faster than inflation (so you can increase rent faster than inflation) and that there is continual economic/job and population growth.

    Only when both conditions are met will you have an income that will enable financial independence. We've completed over ninety 1031 exchanges so far. In most cases, rents were not increasing faster than inflation, the government was controlling the property rather than the landlord, or the city was in decline. To help new clients decide on the best course of action, I put together the following decision diagram.

    Instead of basing your decision on taxes, base it on achieving your financial goal.

    FERNWOOD Team, KW VIP Realty520 Reviews
  • Member since 2018 · 1k+ posts · 1k+ votes
    8mo

    Why am I not seeing a word about what mom and dad want to do and what they are comfortable with doing?

    • Member since 2024 · 69 posts · 25 votes
      8mo
      Quote from @John Clark:

      Why am I not seeing a word about what mom and dad want to do and what they are comfortable with doing?


      Because mom and dad have stated, "you figure it out, you'll have to deal with it later anyhow..."  So I'm just trying to maximize income and taxes for them.  

      Simple thing is to do nothing and just ride the current situation. But strategically does this make the most sense?  Probably from an "easy" point of view.  

      At the end of the day, I'm just trying to educate myself.

      As I recently told my dad, "Just spend the money, you can't take it with you. None of us are waiting or need the inheritance."
  • Investor · Las Vegas, NV · Member since 2013 · 8k+ posts · 10k+ votes
    8mo

    You didn't add $1.5M worth of capitalization when you bought the hypothetical $2M NNN property. You added the MAYBE $80k left you couldn't depreciate from the first property and the $500k in cash/loans you use to complete the sale. But, maybe you only bought $1.6M worth of property (out of that $2m) that could be depreciated if the rest is land.

    Your CPA will have to tell you which possibility below is the answer. (Or something else.) Because I don’t have a clue. 

    1) You bought a $2M property with $1.6M that can be depreciated. And that’s your remaining property basis ($80k) plus $100k of the $500k you added so you can depreciate $180k. Over 40 years, or $4,500/yr saving $1,500/yr in taxes?

    2) You get lucky and you can depreciate all of the new $500k you added and the $80k you had remaining. So you get to depreciate $580k over 40 years $14,500/yr saving you $5k/yr in taxes? 

    You don’t get to depreciate the $1.5M value, (the buyer will), only your original purchase price. (Of the building, not total.) And you say that’s been depreciated to zero. Neither one gets me to pay $70-$100k+ to sell the old property with 14-70 year payback period.

  • Aaron ZimmermanBusiness Member
    Accountant · Chicago, IL · Member since 2018 · 2k+ posts · 1k+ votes
    8mo

    How much is the cash flow per month? It doesn't seem incredibly high if you take even a 30% expense ratio, you have $5k in cash flow before taxes which is about a 3% ROE. 

    you mentioned rents being $7,250. What are market rents?

    I would also consider what the tax gain is because you'd need to buy a much bigger property to have any depreciation. I'd focus on increasing ROE and see if you can bump that up to at least 5-6%. 

  • Ben FernandezBusiness Member
    Realtor · Lancaster, PA · Member since 2025 · 169 posts · 97 votes
    8mo

    Leverage th asset for a line of credit. If/when you use the line of credit to purchase another piece of real estate, be sure it'll cash flow once you convert to a long-term loan.

  • Member since 2024 · 69 posts · 25 votes
    8mo

    @Bill B. Thanks for the insight.  I did some more reading.  I thought the depreciation was reset upon exchanging into a new building.  But it's only the delta between the selling price and the new building price.  

    Unless the delta is large, the depreciation isn't going to be much. In my head I was thinking to 1031 into a slightly more expensive property so cashflow would be high, not a lot of debt, and take advantage of the depreciation.  But this won't work unless we 1031 into something more expensive (say $1m+ delta). 


    I think this option is off the table.  Remaining options are, do nothing or take equity out and reinvest it.  

    Thanks for the knowledge! Learn something new everything, in this case, what I learned was very valuable!

Join the conversationCreate a free account to reply, vote on answers and follow this thread.