Updated 6 days ago on . Most recent reply
How Are Investors Evaluating Commercial Deals Today?
When underwriting commercial deals:
What carries the most weight right now?
• Tenant quality
• Lease length
• Market stability
• Cash flow
Would love to hear different perspectives.
Most Popular Reply
- Property Manager
- Calabasas, CA
- 63
- Votes |
- 131
- Posts
On the retail and NNN side where I spend most of my time, lease length and tenant quality are pretty inseparable right now — you can't really underwrite one without stress-testing the other. A 10-year lease with a regional operator that's showing declining same-store sales is worth a lot less than a 5-year lease with a national credit tenant that actually needs your location.
The other metric I weight heavily on smaller commercial deals is the lease structure quality — specifically whether the operating expenses are truly passed through or whether there are carve-outs and caps that quietly turn a NNN deal into a gross lease over time. I've reviewed a lot of deals where the seller is calling it NNN but the roof, structure, and HVAC were carved out, the CAM was capped at 2009 base-year levels, and management fees weren't recoverable. The actual landlord expense burden on those "NNN" deals can look closer to a modified gross.
Market stability matters but I think it gets over-indexed. A stable market with a weak tenant in a bad location will underperform a slightly softer market with a strong tenant who actually drives traffic. Site-level fundamentals — visibility, access, co-tenancy, density trends — matter more than MSA-level stats for most small to mid-size retail.



