Updated over 10 years ago on . Most recent reply

I'm a home builder but want to build my own portfolio: Buy and Hold or Build and Hold?
I'm new to the forum (thanks to all that are so active and open!), and am just starting my own home building business, I am also looking to build a portfolio over time (no hurry) starting in 2016.
My goals include me NOT being a property manager, and NOT rehabbing. So I figure I could buy decent retail properties, or just build my own.
Decent SFR properties in this area start in the low $100's. I could build new on the right lot for around the same thing. My estimations say I could build a 1400' 3/2 for around $85k, lots in the area I am looking range from $30-$50k. So at max, I would have $135k in a brand new rental that I could rent for $1250-$1450 per month.
Assuming those numbers are correct, wouldn't it be better to build and hold instead of buy and hold? My thought process is I would hopefully have less maintenance issues, less vacancy (newer home), and better value when/if I sell.
Most Popular Reply

- Real Estate Consultant
- Summerlin, NV
- 64,998
- Votes |
- 43,993
- Posts
answered your own question its a no brainer.. the other thing is new construction usually brings much better and higher paying tenant,, as opposed to what @Elizabeth Colegrove
mentioned... I bought 11 new homes in MS for Go Zone tax benefits 7 years ago and they are hands down the best rentals I ever had... I also owned 350 plus older homes in the South the tenant and maintenance was not even close.
I know a few builder developers here in Oregon that's all they do.. they build new... and rent half or more of the new builds sell the other half and have created monster portfolios of very decent housing not 50 year old junkers.
- Jay Hinrichs
- Podcast Guest on Show #222
