Chicago Investors we have a serious problem : Call to Action

Chicago Investors we have a serious problem : Call to Action

Brie SchmidtBusiness Member
Moderator
Real Estate Broker · Chicago, IL · Member since 2013 · 6k+ posts · 5k+ votes

Chicago just implemented the largest assault on property owner rights you have ever seen, if it’s not stopped, it could be implemented throughout Cook County and beyond.

The ordinance does two things: creates an opportunity for tenants to purchase their building when it is up for sale (a right of first refusal) in some Northwest side neighborhoods, and increases demolition surcharges by 400%

Here’s how the ordinance creates up to nine (9) months of delay in selling a building. Owners have to give their tenants:

  • * Up to 60 days advance notice of their intention to sell;
  • * Up to 90 days to decide whether or not they are interested in buying the building;
  • * Complete financial information including rent rolls; and
  • * Up to 120 additional days to find financing if they want to match the offer.

The ordinance applies to SFH, 2-4 units, mixed use and large apartment buildings—and even rented condos. It will depress sales prices, even if there is a buyer willing to go through the hassle of dealing with this ordinance. Clearly 1031 deals will be impossible. Owner occupied sales will be eliminated since a provision in the ordinance requires you to keep tenants for 6 months even if they are MTM or their lease expires.

Act now. Seriously, ACT NOW.

  • * The fines are up to $1,000 a day for non-compliance and proof of compliance will need to be submitted and reviewed by the DOH and a certificate will be issued to the title company.
  • * We may see mass evacuations of buildings because this ordinance is too difficult to deal with and it does not apply to vacant properties.
  • * No buyer is going to spend thousands of dollars in due diligence on a deal that might not move forward.
  • * The tenants have the right to sell the contract to a third party for a profit.

This ordinance will drive out small, local owners, replacing them with cash-rich, out-of-town corporate owners. This is a problem for all of us and we need your help right now. You need to tell your alderman, and the alderman of every building you own, what a terrible idea this is—even outside the ordinance zone.

Get informed! The NBOA has put together a page with more detailed info, updates and additional calls to action at nboachicago Make sure you sign up for their newsletter and stay up to date on how you can get involved.

Brie Schmidt, Designated Managing Broker of Second City Real Estate and Bob Floss, Owner of Floss Law have an extensive video on YouTube/ChicagoBrie. It includes a highlight video and reels you can share on social media.

Spread the word by sharing this on social media, with your friends and colleagues, and anyone you know who could be potentially impacted by this. This ordinance is awful and you need to help make sure it is stopped.

@Tom Shallcross @Mark Ainley @Crystal Smith @Lumi Ispas @Henry Lazerow @Sarita Scherpereel @Bob Floss II @John Warren @Jonathan Klemm

14Reply
112 views

Most Popular Reply

Russell BrazilBusiness Member
Moderator
Real Estate Agent · Washington, D.C. · Member since 2012 · 17k+ posts · 30k+ votes
1y
Quote from @Chris Seveney:

Sounds a lot of what they did in Washington DC, which now tenants know these laws and you have to pay them off in order to sell the property because they can lock up a sale for a period of time to delay it being sold. 

Yup, we've had that in DC for decades. Though in 2017 we were successful in having it repealed for single unit properties. Though they are currently trying to bring it back.

It basically amounts to legalized extortion.
See this reply in the discussion

39 Replies

Jump to latestLatest
  • Drew SygitBusiness Member
    Property Manager · Royal Oak, MI · Member since 2012 · 12k+ posts · 9k+ votes
    1y

    Politicians are getting too extreme!

    • Brie SchmidtBusiness Member
      Moderator
      OP
      Real Estate Broker · Chicago, IL · Member since 2013 · 6k+ posts · 5k+ votes
      1y
      Quote from @Drew Sygit:

      Politicians are getting too extreme!


       Yes, the problem in Chicago is we have so many mom and pop investors and no way to reach all of them except word of mouth.  This was passed in October and I would say at least 50% of investors, and agents, have no idea about it and the other 40% don't fully understand it

    • Jay HinrichsBusiness Member
      Real Estate Consultant · Summerlin, NV · Member since 2014 · 45k+ posts · 66k+ votes
      1y
      Quote from @Brie Schmidt:
      Quote from @Drew Sygit:

      Politicians are getting too extreme!


       Yes, the problem in Chicago is we have so many mom and pop investors and no way to reach all of them except word of mouth.  This was passed in October and I would say at least 50% of investors, and agents, have no idea about it and the other 40% don't fully understand it


      reality is how many tenants can actually buy those properties ?  I bet a small % its why they are renters and not owners in the first place.
    • Brie SchmidtBusiness Member
      Moderator
      OP
      Real Estate Broker · Chicago, IL · Member since 2013 · 6k+ posts · 5k+ votes
      1y

      @Jay Hinrichs - agree but the problems still exist for us:

      We can't do 1031 exchanges anymore because the process will now take 4-6 months

      We can't do owner occupied loans because we have to keep tenants for 6 months after the sale even if their lease expires

      A distressed seller now needs to pay $60,000 or more if they sell to a developer

      The Dept of Housing has to review and approve all the proof of compliance before we can close

      Buyers wont spend thousands of dollars on DD till they know the deal is going forward which can be 30-90 days

    • Jay HinrichsBusiness Member
      Real Estate Consultant · Summerlin, NV · Member since 2014 · 45k+ posts · 66k+ votes
      1y
      Quote from @Brie Schmidt:

      @Jay Hinrichs - agree but the problems still exist for us:

      We can't do 1031 exchanges anymore because the process will now take 4-6 months

      We can't do owner occupied loans because we have to keep tenants for 6 months after the sale even if their lease expires

      A distressed seller now needs to pay $60,000 or more if they sell to a developer

      The Dept of Housing has to review and approve all the proof of compliance before we can close

      Buyers wont spend thousands of dollars on DD till they know the deal is going forward which can be 30-90 days


      WOW is all I can say..  Regardless of your politics this is insane .. basically socialism communistic type approach.  And this is Law Today ?  
    • Brie SchmidtBusiness Member
      Moderator
      OP
      Real Estate Broker · Chicago, IL · Member since 2013 · 6k+ posts · 5k+ votes
      1y
      Quote from @Jay Hinrichs:
      Quote from @Brie Schmidt:

      @Jay Hinrichs - agree but the problems still exist for us:

      We can't do 1031 exchanges anymore because the process will now take 4-6 months

      We can't do owner occupied loans because we have to keep tenants for 6 months after the sale even if their lease expires

      A distressed seller now needs to pay $60,000 or more if they sell to a developer

      The Dept of Housing has to review and approve all the proof of compliance before we can close

      Buyers wont spend thousands of dollars on DD till they know the deal is going forward which can be 30-90 days


      WOW is all I can say..  Regardless of your politics this is insane .. basically socialism communistic type approach.  And this is Law Today ?  

       Went into effect today!  They actually amended it a few times after everyone flipped out so this version is actually way better than it was.  They obviously got no input from anyone with common business knowledge

    • Lender · Chicago IL · Member since 2020 · 357 posts · 229 votes
      1y

      Quote from @Brie Schmidt:
      Quote from @Drew Sygit:

      Politicians are getting too extreme!


       Yes, the problem in Chicago is we have so many mom and pop investors and no way to reach all of them except word of mouth.  This was passed in October and I would say at least 50% of investors, and agents, have no idea about it and the other 40% don't fully understand it

      @Brie Schmidt I had ZERO idea about this, thank you for sharing.What a SHAM. Is there a template you use to contact our Alderman?

    • Brie SchmidtBusiness Member
      Moderator
      OP
      Real Estate Broker · Chicago, IL · Member since 2013 · 6k+ posts · 5k+ votes
      1y
      Quote from @Jennie Berger:



       It passed in October!  If you go to nboachicago.com/nspo there is a link to message all the alderman.  Please share with your network!

  • Chris SeveneyBusiness Member
    Moderator
    Investor · VA · Member since 2015 · 21k+ posts · 19k+ votes
    1y

    Sounds a lot of what they did in Washington DC, which now tenants know these laws and you have to pay them off in order to sell the property because they can lock up a sale for a period of time to delay it being sold. 

    7e investments53 Reviews
    • Brie SchmidtBusiness Member
      Moderator
      OP
      Real Estate Broker · Chicago, IL · Member since 2013 · 6k+ posts · 5k+ votes
      1y
      Quote from @Chris Seveney:

      Sounds a lot of what they did in Washington DC, which now tenants know these laws and you have to pay them off in order to sell the property because they can lock up a sale for a period of time to delay it being sold. 


       Yes, it was copied off of DC and currently is just a pilot program.  We studied the DC impact and talked to lawyers and property owners and they told us some of the work arounds

    • Russell BrazilBusiness Member
      Moderator
      Real Estate Agent · Washington, D.C. · Member since 2012 · 17k+ posts · 30k+ votes
      1y
      Quote from @Chris Seveney:

      Sounds a lot of what they did in Washington DC, which now tenants know these laws and you have to pay them off in order to sell the property because they can lock up a sale for a period of time to delay it being sold. 

      Yup, we've had that in DC for decades. Though in 2017 we were successful in having it repealed for single unit properties. Though they are currently trying to bring it back.

      It basically amounts to legalized extortion.
    • Real Estate Broker · Cleveland Dayton Cincinnati Toledo Columbus & Akron, OH · Member since 2013 · 30k+ posts · 20k+ votes
      1y
      Quote from @Russell Brazil:
      Quote from @Chris Seveney:

      Sounds a lot of what they did in Washington DC, which now tenants know these laws and you have to pay them off in order to sell the property because they can lock up a sale for a period of time to delay it being sold. 

      Yup, we've had that in DC for decades. Though in 2017 we were successful in having it repealed for single unit properties. Though they are currently trying to bring it back.

      It basically amounts to legalized extortion.

       Extorting landlords is standard operating procedure for any liberal city government.

  • Austin, TX · Member since 2019 · 5k+ posts · 5k+ votes
    1y

    I cannot see most typical renters being able to organize themselves enough to qualify for financing.

    I think throw the baby out with the bathwater window in this preposterous suggestion is going to be financing requires a large down payment, and the irresponsibility on the renters part regarding asset management to comply with the loan.

    Just my 2 cents!

    • Brie SchmidtBusiness Member
      Moderator
      OP
      Real Estate Broker · Chicago, IL · Member since 2013 · 6k+ posts · 5k+ votes
      1y
      Quote from @Scott Mac:

      I cannot see most typical renters being able to organize themselves enough to qualify for financing.

      I think throw the baby out with the bathwater window in this preposterous suggestion is going to be financing requires a large down payment, and the irresponsibility on the renters part regarding asset management to comply with the loan.

      Just my 2 cents!

      Get this... The city will offer grant programs and special financing terms with 100% LTV to tenants who want to buy their building. The trade off is the building must remain affordable housing for 30 years.

      I ran some scenarios using past sales assuming 3% increase in expenses and no increase in rents and by year 9 they are negative cash flow.  Year 11 they are losing $1k a month and the property is worth 80% of what they bought it for.  Good luck selling that with 19 more years of the restrictive covenant on it

    • Austin, TX · Member since 2019 · 5k+ posts · 5k+ votes
      1y
      Quote from @Brie Schmidt:
      Quote from @Scott Mac:

      I cannot see most typical renters being able to organize themselves enough to qualify for financing.

      I think throw the baby out with the bathwater window in this preposterous suggestion is going to be financing requires a large down payment, and the irresponsibility on the renters part regarding asset management to comply with the loan.

      Just my 2 cents!

      Get this... The city will offer grant programs and special financing terms with 100% LTV to tenants who want to buy their building. The trade off is the building must remain affordable housing for 30 years.

      I ran some scenarios using past sales assuming 3% increase in expenses and no increase in rents and by year 9 they are negative cash flow.  Year 11 they are losing $1k a month and the property is worth 80% of what they bought it for.  Good luck selling that with 19 more years of the restrictive covenant on it


       Go and walk you're typical affordable units.

      I don't think those units are brimming with potential owners . 

      My guess is if any of this gets off the ground it will crash within a year (Receivership).

  • Real Estate Agent · Chicago, IL · Member since 2017 · 2k+ posts · 2k+ votes
    1y

    What are the work arounds Washington DC investors/realtors are using? I assume just emptying a building of tenants prior to sale is probably going to be easiest. 

    • Brie SchmidtBusiness Member
      Moderator
      OP
      Real Estate Broker · Chicago, IL · Member since 2013 · 6k+ posts · 5k+ votes
      1y
      Quote from @Henry Lazerow:

      What are the work arounds Washington DC investors/realtors are using? I assume just emptying a building of tenants prior to sale is probably going to be easiest. 

       @Russell Brazil ?

      2-4 I'm less concerned as long as one unit is vacant before you deliver intent.  5+ though with a 90 day ROFR are screwed unless the offer concessions

  • Real Estate Agent · Chicago, IL · Member since 2017 · 2k+ posts · 2k+ votes
    1y

    “Once fifty percent of tenants waive their right to purchase, the time of tenant rights ends”


    Being 50% of tenants voting no to buying ends the opportunity for tenants to offer, sellers could probably just get the occupancy down to 50% and set up an LLC to rent the other 50% of units, may not even need to empty whole building saving on the carry costs. Is there a restriction on owner interest in a corporation for tenant voting rights? The original 30-60 day notice period is really not a huge deal as long as know can sell after that period ends without issues. We already plan out most of our listings a good month or two in advance anyways.

  • Nathan GesnerBusiness Member
    Moderator
    Real Estate Broker · Cody, WY · Member since 2010 · 28k+ posts · 41k+ votes
    1y

    The number one rule in real estate: location, location, location.

    Sometimes, that refers to an entire city or state.

    The DIY Landlord Book4.7248 Reviews
    • Brie SchmidtBusiness Member
      Moderator
      OP
      Real Estate Broker · Chicago, IL · Member since 2013 · 6k+ posts · 5k+ votes
      1y
      Quote from @Nathan Gesner:

      The number one rule in real estate: location, location, location.

      Sometimes, that refers to an entire city or state.


       This is one of the interesting things about Chicago, each ward has an alderman and they have full zoning and building approval for their ward.  The previous mayor tried to strip them of this power and centralize things as one of their first priorities and it got struck down so fast it was never brought up again.  

      So you will see certain parts of the city where they will never upzone a lot no matter what the circumstances.  You go to the one next door and you can get upzoned to the biggest density of you pay to play.  There was a whole case study done on an area called Uptown that had the same alderman for 24 years who was against any development or gentrification and how that neighborhood didn't progress while everything around it did.

      So because of something we call aldermanic prerogative something like this can pass in just one ward.  Now this is a polit program with a sunset date of 2029 but at any point any other alderman can make it effective in their ward.  

      They originally brought it to city counsel for a vote with less than 48 hours notice and made it effective that day (back in October) but luckily realized you can't implement something like this with oversight from the DOH and legal forms overnight.  

      The original version was way worse, as they did not consult a single person with any real estate experience and at least made some modifications after talking to the realtor board. 

  • Don KonipolBusiness Member
    Investor · The Woodlands TX / Avon, CT · Member since 2009 · 6k+ posts · 10k+ votes
    1y
    Quote from @Brie Schmidt:

    Chicago just implemented the largest assault on property owner rights you have ever seen, if it’s not stopped, it could be implemented throughout Cook County and beyond.

    The ordinance does two things: creates an opportunity for tenants to purchase their building when it is up for sale (a right of first refusal) in some Northwest side neighborhoods, and increases demolition surcharges by 400%

    Here’s how the ordinance creates up to nine (9) months of delay in selling a building. Owners have to give their tenants:

    • * Up to 60 days advance notice of their intention to sell;
    • * Up to 90 days to decide whether or not they are interested in buying the building;
    • * Complete financial information including rent rolls; and
    • * Up to 120 additional days to find financing if they want to match the offer.

    The ordinance applies to SFH, 2-4 units, mixed use and large apartment buildings—and even rented condos. It will depress sales prices, even if there is a buyer willing to go through the hassle of dealing with this ordinance. Clearly 1031 deals will be impossible. Owner occupied sales will be eliminated since a provision in the ordinance requires you to keep tenants for 6 months even if they are MTM or their lease expires.

    Act now. Seriously, ACT NOW.

    • * The fines are up to $1,000 a day for non-compliance and proof of compliance will need to be submitted and reviewed by the DOH and a certificate will be issued to the title company.
    • * We may see mass evacuations of buildings because this ordinance is too difficult to deal with and it does not apply to vacant properties.
    • * No buyer is going to spend thousands of dollars in due diligence on a deal that might not move forward.
    • * The tenants have the right to sell the contract to a third party for a profit.

    This ordinance will drive out small, local owners, replacing them with cash-rich, out-of-town corporate owners. This is a problem for all of us and we need your help right now. You need to tell your alderman, and the alderman of every building you own, what a terrible idea this is—even outside the ordinance zone.

    Get informed! The NBOA has put together a page with more detailed info, updates and additional calls to action at nboachicago Make sure you sign up for their newsletter and stay up to date on how you can get involved.

    Brie Schmidt, Designated Managing Broker of Second City Real Estate and Bob Floss, Owner of Floss Law have an extensive video on YouTube/ChicagoBrie. It includes a highlight video and reels you can share on social media.

    Spread the word by sharing this on social media, with your friends and colleagues, and anyone you know who could be potentially impacted by this. This ordinance is awful and you need to help make sure it is stopped.

    @Tom Shallcross @Mark Ainley @Crystal Smith @Lumi Ispas @Henry Lazerow @Sarita Scherpereel @Bob Floss II @John Warren @Jonathan Klemm

    Communism didn’t die with the dismantlement of the Berlin Wall.  It just moved to the east and west coast cities in the U.S. 
    Private Mortgage Financing Partners, LLC
    • Developer · New York City, NY · Member since 2015 · 812 posts · 718 votes
      1y

      Great.  Expect this to come to NYC and NJ soon. Keep electing idiots to power.  Makes great sense.

    • Brie SchmidtBusiness Member
      Moderator
      OP
      Real Estate Broker · Chicago, IL · Member since 2013 · 6k+ posts · 5k+ votes
      1y
      Quote from @Calvin Thomas:

      Great.  Expect this to come to NYC and NJ soon. Keep electing idiots to power.  Makes great sense.


       It is being talked about in NYC

    • Developer · New York City, NY · Member since 2015 · 812 posts · 718 votes
      1y
      Quote from @Brie Schmidt:
      Quote from @Calvin Thomas:

      Great.  Expect this to come to NYC and NJ soon. Keep electing idiots to power.  Makes great sense.


       It is being talked about in NYC


      Sadly, not surprised with the commies who run the counsel.
  • Roderick MasonPro Member
    Lender · Chicago · Member since 2025 · 4 posts · 2 votes
    1y

    The current administration is so far off the rails. They really are not business friendly.

  • Joe S.Pro Member
    Investor · San Antonio · Member since 2020 · 3k+ posts · 3k+ votes
    1y

    Sounds crazy…. I’m sorry to hear that the clueless are trying to run politics in Chicago. I say clueless as a kind gesture, because I would hate to think they were just straight up evil people.. 

    • Real Estate Broker · Cleveland Dayton Cincinnati Toledo Columbus & Akron, OH · Member since 2013 · 30k+ posts · 20k+ votes
      1y
      Quote from @Joe S.:

      Sounds crazy…. I’m sorry to hear that the clueless are trying to run politics in Chicago. I say clueless as a kind gesture, because I would hate to think they were just straight up evil people.. 


       Na, it's simpler than that. The investors are the minority. There are more people who live there than there are investors. They're gonna keep on doing things that appeal to the voters. The investors are not the voters. This is happening in every blue city in America.

    • Joe S.Pro Member
      Investor · San Antonio · Member since 2020 · 3k+ posts · 3k+ votes
      1y
      Quote from @James Wise:
      Quote from @Joe S.:

      Sounds crazy…. I’m sorry to hear that the clueless are trying to run politics in Chicago. I say clueless as a kind gesture, because I would hate to think they were just straight up evil people.. 


       Na, it's simpler than that. The investors are the minority. There are more people who live there than there are investors. They're gonna keep on doing things that appeal to the voters. The investors are not the voters. This is happening in every blue city in America.

      So James,
      I definitely am not disagreeing with what you said. With the above logic that you mentioned the question stands. Are politicians clueless that they are destroying the economics of the city for a vote or are they simply evil enough to destroy the economics for a vote????

      Or is it option C….. evil and clueless. :-) Lol.

    • Real Estate Broker · Cleveland Dayton Cincinnati Toledo Columbus & Akron, OH · Member since 2013 · 30k+ posts · 20k+ votes
      1y
      Quote from @Joe S.:
      Quote from @James Wise:
      Quote from @Joe S.:

      Sounds crazy…. I’m sorry to hear that the clueless are trying to run politics in Chicago. I say clueless as a kind gesture, because I would hate to think they were just straight up evil people.. 


       Na, it's simpler than that. The investors are the minority. There are more people who live there than there are investors. They're gonna keep on doing things that appeal to the voters. The investors are not the voters. This is happening in every blue city in America.

      So James,
      I definitely am not disagreeing with what you said. With the above logic that you mentioned the question stands. Are politicians clueless that they are destroying the economics of the city for a vote or are they simply evil enough to destroy the economics for a vote????

      Or is it option C….. evil and clueless. :-) Lol.


       I don't think Politicians think or care about anything beyond "how can I get elected and re-elected."

    • Brie SchmidtBusiness Member
      Moderator
      OP
      Real Estate Broker · Chicago, IL · Member since 2013 · 6k+ posts · 5k+ votes
      1y
      Quote from @Joe S.:
      Quote from @James Wise:
      Quote from @Joe S.:

      Sounds crazy…. I’m sorry to hear that the clueless are trying to run politics in Chicago. I say clueless as a kind gesture, because I would hate to think they were just straight up evil people.. 


       Na, it's simpler than that. The investors are the minority. There are more people who live there than there are investors. They're gonna keep on doing things that appeal to the voters. The investors are not the voters. This is happening in every blue city in America.

      So James,
      I definitely am not disagreeing with what you said. With the above logic that you mentioned the question stands. Are politicians clueless that they are destroying the economics of the city for a vote or are they simply evil enough to destroy the economics for a vote????

      Or is it option C….. evil and clueless. :-) Lol.


      In this case it seems they are straight up clueless. Originally the tenants did not have to prove any financial capability before locking up the deal, so we fought it and got that changed. 25% of the housing stock is 2-4 unit properties and you can't vacate a tenant once you deliver the intent notice, even if their lease expires. You also can't vacate a tenant for 6 months after closing even if their lease expires - totally wiping out any househackers in this area of Chicago. They say lenders will still allow you to buy with an OO loan, which why obviously didn't talk to any lenders about it

    • Jay HinrichsBusiness Member
      Real Estate Consultant · Summerlin, NV · Member since 2014 · 45k+ posts · 66k+ votes
      1y
      Quote from @James Wise:
      Quote from @Joe S.:
      Quote from @James Wise:
      Quote from @Joe S.:

      Sounds crazy…. I’m sorry to hear that the clueless are trying to run politics in Chicago. I say clueless as a kind gesture, because I would hate to think they were just straight up evil people.. 


       Na, it's simpler than that. The investors are the minority. There are more people who live there than there are investors. They're gonna keep on doing things that appeal to the voters. The investors are not the voters. This is happening in every blue city in America.

      So James,
      I definitely am not disagreeing with what you said. With the above logic that you mentioned the question stands. Are politicians clueless that they are destroying the economics of the city for a vote or are they simply evil enough to destroy the economics for a vote????

      Or is it option C….. evil and clueless. :-) Lol.


       I don't think Politicians think or care about anything beyond "how can I get elected and re-elected."


      last time I was in WA DC at the Reagan Airport there was a conference on national rent control and this dude was walking around and his TEE shirt was like Screw landlords  Rent control now etc etc.. This was before the Centenarian room opened and where i now hang out before flight :)
  • Attorney · Northbrook, IL · Member since 2017 · 719 posts · 549 votes
    1y

    @Brie Schmidt I'm disappointed there is nothing in the ordinance for a seller who has a sense of urgency. If they are in default on the mortgage, I have to explain the tenants have more rights than they do. 

  • Eric FernwoodBusiness Member
    Realtor · Las Vegas, NV · Member since 2014 · 994 posts · 1k+ votes
    1y

    It's hard to believe such regulations as described in the thread are implemented anywhere. The end result will be fewer rental properties, minimal maintenance (properties in poor condition to reduce maintenance costs), and higher rents to compensate investors for additional costs and risks.

    A rental property is valued by the cash flow it generates and its appreciation potential. When regulations increase risk, cap rent increases, and make it difficult to evict non-performing tenants, it's time to consider a 1031 exchange.

    I was living in NYC in 2004 when I decided to start an investor services business. It took little time to realize that New York, New Jersey, and similar states were not good for real estate investing. I chose to relocate to Las Vegas for the following reasons:

    • Unless the courts are backlogged (like after the end of the eviction moratorium), an eviction takes between 17 and 35 days, if you know what you are doing. Because evictions are quick and cost effective, tenants know that if they don’t pay rent, they will be evicted.
    • The standard leasing agreement has significant landlord protections, thereby keeping rents lower.
    • There is no obligation to renew a lease.
    • If a property is sold and there is a tenant in the property, the lease survives the sale. However, the tenant has no say in the sale, such as you stated.

    There are many other advantages of where I chose to relocate.

    The anti-landlord regulations in many states are why we've completed over eighty 1031 exchanges. At some point, rent control and high operating costs make real estate investing no longer viable.

    FERNWOOD Team, KW VIP Realty520 Reviews
  • Crystal SmithPro Member
    Moderator
    Real Estate Broker · Chicago, IL · Member since 2014 · 2k+ posts · 1k+ votes
    1y

    @Brie Schmidt- Thanks for posting this. I had no idea that this was being considered and I'm a little shocked that it passed.  We will spread the word through our network.

    • Brie SchmidtBusiness Member
      Moderator
      OP
      Real Estate Broker · Chicago, IL · Member since 2013 · 6k+ posts · 5k+ votes
      1y
      Quote from @Crystal Smith:

      @Brie Schmidt- Thanks for posting this. I had no idea that this was being considered and I'm a little shocked that it passed.  We will spread the word through our network.


       It passed in October!  They originally made it effective immediately and we got them to extend it till March 1.  I am going to reach out with some resources 

  • Fayetteville, AR · Member since 2025 · 20 posts · 8 votes
    1y

    @Brandon Bolger This is really impactful to investors. I know it's only in Cook County, Brandon, but it is definitely something to watch develop if you consider investing there.

  • Jonathan KlemmBusiness Member
    Moderator
    Contractor · Chicago, IL · Member since 2016 · 4k+ posts · 2k+ votes
    1y

    @Brie Schmidt - Keep it up!  Chicago has a lot of challenges, but this seems ridiculous!

    What is the primary justification for them trying to implement something like this?  Is it weirdly trying to incentivize tenants to purchase the buildings?  Turn tenants into home owers...so many better ways than this...

    • Brie SchmidtBusiness Member
      Moderator
      OP
      Real Estate Broker · Chicago, IL · Member since 2013 · 6k+ posts · 5k+ votes
      1y
      Quote from @Jonathan Klemm:

      @Brie Schmidt - Keep it up!  Chicago has a lot of challenges, but this seems ridiculous!

      What is the primary justification for them trying to implement something like this?  Is it weirdly trying to incentivize tenants to purchase the buildings?  Turn tenants into home owers...so many better ways than this...


       The intent behind this is to keep people in their homes and stop the progress of gentrification in these neighborhoods.

      I agree that the deconversion of 2-4 units in Chicago is a huge problem. One thing I really like about this ordinance is every block will be limited to no more than 50% SFH. But this problem is city wide and is drastically reducing the housing stock in every neighborhood. That is the city's fault really as they are the ones who rezoned every side street to RS-3 and won't upzone existing 2-4 unit properties.

      This was obviously written by people with no understanding of how real estate works.  You can't get rid of any tenants without just cause during the sale process and you have to keep tenants for 6 months after closing, even if their lease expires or is MTM.  So nobody can house hack unless the seller vacates a unit before listing - which does the exact opposite of what the ordinance is intended to do <face palm>

Join the conversationCreate a free account to reply, vote on answers and follow this thread.