Is Buying with Cash Really the “Conservative” Move?

Question

It really depends on your goals. Personally, I try to use as much leverage as possible assuming the property will sustain itself, because I’m looking at the long-term and I can stomach potentially being underwater during a market correction. I also try to add value to everything I buy, and I’m very careful about purchase price relative to comps.

That said, I have clients who are much more conservative when it comes to debt. I’m working on a $690k duplex transaction right now with an investor paying all cash. Deals like that are relatively rare, because leverage is one of the main reasons real estate has created so many millionaires.

If you put 80k down on a 400k duplex and the market appreciates 3%, you just got roughly a 15% return on your original cash investment from appreciation alone. If you bought that same duplex with cash, your appreciation return would still just be 3%.

On the other hand, if you’re relatively new to investing, you might not want to put your entire 235k into one property. You may be better off spreading that across 2-3 smaller deals while keeping some liquidity and reserves.

A lot of people see 235k and immediately think commercial real estate, and that can absolutely make sense, but many investors find that 1-4 unit properties are a much better introduction into the world of landlording unless you find a commercial deal in exceptional shape in a great area.

Most deals are not killed by a few hundred dollars a month in negative cash flow. They get killed by major capital expenses, long vacancies, expensive evictions, unexpected repairs, or investors simply running out of cash. All of those problems become exponentially worse when you don’t have reserves sitting in the bank.

At the end of the day, it all comes down to your tolerance for risk and your long-term goals. Finding a balance is key. Becoming as leveraged as possible and constantly borrowing against everything you own will eventually catch up to most people, but putting 300k down on a single property probably isn’t going to create life-changing wealth or buy back much of your time either.

JD Martin · Answer

When I first started out (well, re-started out) I did all cash because I had been burned in RE before. Eventually I figured out that I was good at buying properties and renting them out but running out of capital because all of my liquidity was locked up in houses. So I started using leverage and never looked back. Even so, my overall leverage is pretty low I'd say compared to most investors (about 30% total over the entire portfolio) and I could be earning a lot more money if I unlocked the funds stuck in a lot of these properties. But I'm lazy - well, at least lazier than I was when I was younger. In a few years I'll start selling off the portfolio because no heirs are going to want it, so there's not much incentive for me to keep working at maximizing my return as I'm already pretty comfortable in life.

If I had started with leverage I'd probably have twice the net worth I have now. I missed out on a lot of deals by being "conservative" and paying all cash. On the other hand, it enabled me to build my confidence after not having a very good start in RE so that can't be minimized.

Jules Aton · Answer

This is a smart strategy. There is a point where we have enough. Enjoy the fruits of your labor while you still have the mental and physical abilities to do so. Many don't have the insight to stop playing when they have won the game and leave heirs a mess of properties in disrepair with under market rents.

Jules Aton · Answer

I think it can also depend on the person's AA and stage in life. I have no need to leverage anything at this point so I purchased my last two and renovated with cash due to higher interest rates and being heavy in the stock market. I sold stocks to buy RE which re-balanced my portfolio. It was also nice to have the advantage of a quick close and cash offer.

David Krulac · Answer

@Adam Tafel  The first 11 properties that I bought were 100% financed, because I didn't have any money for frivolose things like down payments. Of the last 100 properties I bought 95 were zero percent financed.  Paying cash is more conservative because it sharply reduces the possibility that you will ever lose the property in foreclosure.

Theresa Harris · Answer

Maybe prices are cheaper where you are, but where I am if I waited until I had enough cash to buy a place outright, it would be really hard to buy a place especially now where the cheapest is $200K and houses start at $400K in my local market (which is one of the more affordable).

J Castro · Answer

Great perspective,@Adam Tafel. From a lender's standpoint, I don't think buying with cash is inherently more conservative—it's really about preserving optionality and managing risk.

One of the biggest advantages of financing is that it allows investors to preserve liquidity. Having capital available for unexpected repairs, vacancies, value-add improvements, or the next acquisition can often be more valuable than owning a property free and clear. At the same time, leverage only works when the deal is well underwritten and the property's cash flow can comfortably support the debt.

We often encourage investors to strike a balance: use financing strategically while maintaining healthy reserves. Whether it's a DSCR loan, a fix-and-flip loan, or a portfolio refinance, the right loan structure should complement your investment strategy—not dictate it.

If anyone in the group is weighing the pros and cons of paying cash versus financing, we'd be happy to review the numbers and compare both scenarios. Sometimes a simple side-by-side analysis reveals which option creates the best long-term return while keeping enough capital available for future opportunities.

At the end of the day, the best investment strategy is the one that aligns with your financial goals, risk tolerance, and long-term plan.

Michael K Gallagher · Answer

@Adam Tafel thanks for putting this together, I tend to agree.  Conservative to one investor and their goals can potentially seem risky to another and their goals and objectives.

Is Buying with Cash Really the “Conservative” Move?

Most Popular Reply