Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
General Landlording & Rental Properties
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 7 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

6
Posts
2
Votes
Dustin Hughes
  • Investor
  • Houston, TX
2
Votes |
6
Posts

Is it him or is it me?

Dustin Hughes
  • Investor
  • Houston, TX
Posted
Brief background: I still own rental property and relocated from TX to AL in 2017. I decided to rent a house for a year to decide where I’d prefer to live long term instead of rushing. Straight to the point: I am buying my next home end of Feb and my current lease is not over until end of Apr. I have notified the owner the the house could be ready for a new tenant early as Mid-March. His response: “I prefer to hold you to the end of the agreed upon lease and have no intention to find another tenant early.” My question to the Bigger Pockets members: as a landlord myself, I cannot see any advantages. What am I missing here? Any idea why the owner would show no interest in another placement? (He is not likely to move in—this is one of at least two rentals I know he owns) Just seems like he had the advantage of early warning. I guess I can say my conscience is clear for trying—but that’s why I’m posting this—I want to make sure I am not missing some perspective and it’s kind of driving me crazy. Thanks for any useful feedback.

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

9,946
Posts
16,003
Votes
JD Martin
  • Rock Star Extraordinaire
  • Northeast, TN
16,003
Votes |
9,946
Posts
JD Martin
  • Rock Star Extraordinaire
  • Northeast, TN
ModeratorReplied

Possibilities:

1. It is easier to find tenants in May than March. I know it's that way where my properties are.

2. There's no advantage to the landlord to have to get the place ready earlier in the process. Every turnover costs money and energy, such that a turnover every 12 months is better than every 10 months.

3. He plans his vacancies/possible vacancies in some orderly fashion and thus may already be working on other vacancies in March. We try to stagger our lease end dates for this very reason (within the parameters of summer) so that everything doesn't empty at once. 

4. He's bitter that you're leaving.

5. The timing is inconvenient to him for some other reason - vacation, etc.

In any case, you asked why the owner would show no interest in another placement - but he's going to have to place a tenant anyway, whether it's mid-March or the beginning of May. Personally, if you were leaving anyway, and had paid March in full and had given proper notice such that it could start to be advertised just before you left, I would probably be inclined to give it a try, but your rationale is really one to your advantage than to the landlord's advantage. You can turn it around, if you were in the shoes, and change some of the dates and times around, and see how it would suck for you if the situation were reversed. 

business profile image
Skyline Properties

Loading replies...