Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Try Pro Features for Free
Start your 7 day free trial. Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties.
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: JD Martin

JD Martin has started 63 posts and replied 9444 times.

Post: Would you rent your property to friends or family?

JD Martin
ModeratorPosted
  • Rock Star Extraordinaire
  • Northeast, TN
  • Posts 9,943
  • Votes 15,998

Only if I could accept that I may be providing charity and repairing the house later. Otherwise, no. Mixing business with friendship, and (often) family, can turn out to be a very bad idea. I will say that I have rented to friends (mine or my wife's) three times, and all three times ended very poorly. In the case of my wife's friends, the rental precipitated the end of the friendship. In the case of my friends, we still remained friends but I never forgot the damages I absorbed nor the fact that I nearly had to evict his squatter children after he moved out. 

Post: Thermostats & Booking.com

JD Martin
ModeratorPosted
  • Rock Star Extraordinaire
  • Northeast, TN
  • Posts 9,943
  • Votes 15,998
Quote from @Patricia Andriolo-Bull:

Combining several prior threads, not necessarily saying that they are related but...

Thermostats-recently someone asked if we lock thermostats.  I hadn't but do include a minimum of 69 in my Welcome Guide.  Reason being - I'm in SWFL and replaced one of my AC units last summer because it froze from a contractor running it with all the windows open in the summer.  My HVAC company recommendation was above 70.  Today, I checked my thermostat in all 3 units.  I normally don't do this but 2 are vacant and was making sure the AC was set at my standard 76.  The guest in the occupied unit had the AC set to 50 DEGREES!  The only reason it reset to 74 is because a guest must have put that on a schedule for Sunday otherwise it would have been a solid 50 the entire time.  Basically, from the moment they got there, almost 4 days ago!  It shows the AC running 24 hours every day!  Photo for a visual...

-This is my first Booking.Com guest in some time.  I generally have great guests as I have said on here before.  Maybe 2 or 3 in the 9 years I've had vacation rentals guests I would want to rent to again.  I have found BDC guests a bit needy and they don't communicate but nothing like this.  

I am not looking forward to getting my electric bill this month.  What is wrong with people?  Does anyone actually set an AC to 50 in their own home?  And yes, I see that people have been setting it below my recommended 69 previously, well, now I am locking it.  I hate to be one of those hosts...


 And that's just a perfect illustration of why we have remote, lockable thermostats in our Florida property. Stupidity. Yes, your electric bill is going to suck but what sucks even more than high electric bills is HVAC repairs. 

I have the Google Nest learning thermostats. They're excellent. Even if I forget to turn it up during vacancies, it does it for me when it senses there's no one around. I can see the same kind of report as what you have there. The only downside to it is having to change from summer to winter as far as the ranges. It does have a "heat+cool" option that should prevent me from having to mess with it, but you can't set separate ranges so whatever your range is for cooling is going to be locked for heat as well. 

As far as people: I was meeting our window contractor at one of our units today to go over some windows they are going to be replacing between tenants. The tenant had almost every window open with the screens, and the AC unit going as well. 

Post: White Kitchen Cabinets in a Rental - What's Your Opinion

JD Martin
ModeratorPosted
  • Rock Star Extraordinaire
  • Northeast, TN
  • Posts 9,943
  • Votes 15,998

We started out using mostly white cabinets, the laminated kind. Eventually switched to unfinished oak. The oak have held up better over time. We don't have any issues cleaning the white cabinets but they are laminate over MDF and in some of the properties they've started to delaminate. The oak can be touched up with poly pretty easy and if anything gets damaged are also easy to match up for replacement. 

I've never had a single bit of feedback from tenants either way. Most tenants just don't care about those things. 

Post: Dishwashers- are they needed?

JD Martin
ModeratorPosted
  • Rock Star Extraordinaire
  • Northeast, TN
  • Posts 9,943
  • Votes 15,998
Quote from @Nathan Gesner:
Quote from @Sam Zawatsky:

@Nathan Gesner which models of dishwasher do you recommend?


I install up to a dozen per year. I typically use a basic Amana model. I buy higher-end ones for higher-end rentals, preferably Whirlpool. In my experience, the higher-end ones don't last any longer than the cheap ones. The most problematic dishwasher I've ever dealt with was a Bosch that cost me 4x what an Amana would cost.


 We install basic Frigidaire models. People don't understand that higher priced models generally just means more doodads, not better build quality. You look at the guts of anything off the shelf that you're buying on dishwashers, washing machines, dryers etc and they're all the same pumps, belts, drums, valves, etc. Doodads cost money and break more often. 

Post: Dishwashers- are they needed?

JD Martin
ModeratorPosted
  • Rock Star Extraordinaire
  • Northeast, TN
  • Posts 9,943
  • Votes 15,998
Quote from @Heather Phildius:

@JD Martin, good evening!

If the properly never had a dishwasher and the lease doesn’t mention it, the landlord isn’t required to install one. It is considered a luxury or convenience, and not a need.

Good luck!


 Not sure why you tagged me, but that's not the question that was asked. He wanted to know if it is worth it to have a dishwasher, not whether he is legally required to provide one in an already occupied unit. 

Post: What are common terms for Right of First Refusal

JD Martin
ModeratorPosted
  • Rock Star Extraordinaire
  • Northeast, TN
  • Posts 9,943
  • Votes 15,998
Quote from @Isaac Passmore:
Quote from @JD Martin:

I think you should just hold them to the current contract or let them buy you out of the contract. "I changed my mind" isn't a valid legal reason to negate a contract, especially if you're willing and able to complete the deal. Let them buy your signature on a cancellation for some reasonable amount of money for your time & effort, or let them know that you're prepared to have an attorney proceed to force consummation of the contract that they freely signed.

Why would you want to go through the time, cost and effort of putting a new wrinkle on a property you already have under contract? 


We have given them the a buyout option and informed them we intend to take legal action if they fail to perform. It has been radio silence. The reasons for adding the right of first refusal is 2-fold. 

1) I only want to use legal action as a last resort. It's crazy expensive, time consuming, and extremely high effort. 

2) If they have a genuinely human reason for no longer wishing to sell. If it's simply price (which everyone believe it is) then we want to be the buyers. However, in the off chance that the seller truly wants to stay in the house, then fine. I just want the right to purchase the property at this current contract's agreed upon price and terms if they want to sell it sometime in the future. 


 The risk you run is in some instance of significant appreciation, not being able to close on it anyway especially if the seller goes to court and raises some issue that allows the court to set aside the agreement - signing under some claimed duress, for example, or unfair loss of value. Courts can and do refuse to enforce contracts they view as unfair or one sided. So you might end up being able to buy but at some higher price. That's why you're really in a spo where a bird in hand is worth potentially well more than two in the bush.

Post: I need advice

JD Martin
ModeratorPosted
  • Rock Star Extraordinaire
  • Northeast, TN
  • Posts 9,943
  • Votes 15,998

No one can tell you what you should do. From your post I agree with your parents because your "strategy" sounds like scattershot to me. But you have to wake up every day and live in your skin, so you'll have to figure that out. 

What I will tell you is this: I came from a total blue-collar existence. No one went to college - hell, no one even finished high school. I was never going to college. I went to the Navy instead. But eventually, I found myself in college, it was a great experience, and I ended up with a PhD after many years. Not once have I ever regretted investing education into myself. The RE "empire", such that it is, that I bought was bought with money I made from having a good career thanks to my education. 

Post: What are common terms for Right of First Refusal

JD Martin
ModeratorPosted
  • Rock Star Extraordinaire
  • Northeast, TN
  • Posts 9,943
  • Votes 15,998

I think you should just hold them to the current contract or let them buy you out of the contract. "I changed my mind" isn't a valid legal reason to negate a contract, especially if you're willing and able to complete the deal. Let them buy your signature on a cancellation for some reasonable amount of money for your time & effort, or let them know that you're prepared to have an attorney proceed to force consummation of the contract that they freely signed.

Why would you want to go through the time, cost and effort of putting a new wrinkle on a property you already have under contract? 

Post: Holding costs when paying all cash? Other concerns?

JD Martin
ModeratorPosted
  • Rock Star Extraordinaire
  • Northeast, TN
  • Posts 9,943
  • Votes 15,998
Quote from @JM Edward:

For experienced investors, using leverage -- borrowing at a lower rate than what you are earning on that money through your real estate flips and BRRRRs seems like a good way to magnify your returns.

For someone new to the game, does it make sense to execute one's first project all-cash? The idea is that you give yourself more time to learn the process, make mistakes and avoid stress. You still have holding costs such as property taxes, insurance and utility bills (what else?), but I'm not thinking greedy on my first project. It could take a whole year and as long as it can return better than 10% that would be a winner to me (ignores the value of my time and stress).

Market swings are a concern for longer holds too. What other factors are there in this regard? Is it sensible or is there a big gotcha I'm missing?

Thank you!


 I started off all-cash because I had taken a big loss before, so when I got back in I was gunshy about using any kind of credit. Eventually I hit a wall on being able to invest and came around to the idea of leverage. Looking back I missed a lot of opportunities at a golden time of buying (2010 onward) because of my insistence on all cash, including the rehabs. I would have probably had double the portfolio I have now, if I had used leverage from the beginning.

There's also another benefit of leverage - the bank becomes your partner, and puts another set of eyes on the project. Because they don't want to lose money, they're going to scrutinize the project for you almost for free, and are going to (probably) refuse to lend you money on poor projects. That right there limits your risk of going it alone and buying something that just ends up being a money pit. 

I get the attraction of all cash, and I still have houses that I own outright, but if you are trying to grow you will be light years ahead with smart leverage. The acceleration of cash slows down considerably when it's trapped in a house. 

Post: Paying Full Year Upfront due to Poor Credit

JD Martin
ModeratorPosted
  • Rock Star Extraordinaire
  • Northeast, TN
  • Posts 9,943
  • Votes 15,998
Quote from @Reece Kennedy:

Tenant number one in property number one for me. 

Recently divorced individual wants to pay 3 months, or even the whole year up front. Which sets off some red flags. They claim their credit is poor (haven’t done full application yet) from recent divorce. Also citing “wanting stability” as a reason. 

More seasoned landlords, does this raise concern to you? Not the first “poor credit from divorce” story I’ve heard from a potential tenant. 

If their credit is poor but everything else looks good, and they’re offering to pay a full year upfront, is the credit really a concern?


Real rookie over here. Appreciate the advice. 


Before anything, you should have a screening process and then stick to it. Otherwise you're just making it up on the fly. If you don't care about credit scores - and they're only one piece of the puzzle - then that part is not necessarily a disqualifier, but if you do care about seeing their credit in the first place - since past performance here is going to give you a good idea of future performance - then they should be completing your credit (and background) check anyway regardless of how they want to pay. 

Credit isn't just about paying a bill on time. It says a lot about your personal values. If you have a loan for everything under the sun, and all of it is 30/60/90 past due or in collections, it says that you are a person who doesn't care about agreements, rules, or the consequences of non-payment. That would bother me more than a person with a 500 credit score with just a handful of creditors paid on time and half a dozen huge medical bills in collections. 

Also: never ignore red flags. I don't know how many tenants we've had by now, but the only "bad" ones were ones that had red flags right from the get-go that we ignored.