Skip to content

Let's keep in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter for timely insights and actionable tips on your real estate journey.

By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions
Followed Discussions Followed Categories Followed People Followed Locations
Short-Term & Vacation Rental Discussions
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback
Account Closed
  • Investor
  • Scottsdale Austin Tuktoyaktuk
4,170
Votes |
4,205
Posts

Phoenix & Scottsdale STR Occupancy Rates

Account Closed
  • Investor
  • Scottsdale Austin Tuktoyaktuk
Posted

I just bought a nice 5 bed 4 bath with pool and mountain views in North Phoenix 85032 that I might make into a STR.

I went to an STR analytics site which says that the zip code has 794 STR homes with a 44% occupancy average over the course of the last 12 months. A mile a way is North Scottsdale which has about the same number of STRS and a 43% occupancy rate over the last 12 months.

Is 43% - 44% occupancy to be expected in nicer destination cities? 

Granted it gets a wee hot in the summer months and STRs grind to a halt, but over the course of 12 months I would have expected 60% to 70% occupancy from what other are posting.

Is the website off on it's numbers?

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

13,578
Posts
16,939
Votes
John Underwood
#1 Short-Term & Vacation Rental Discussions Contributor
  • Investor
  • Greer, SC
16,939
Votes |
13,578
Posts
John Underwood
#1 Short-Term & Vacation Rental Discussions Contributor
  • Investor
  • Greer, SC
Replied

The best way is look at actual similar properties to yours on Vrbo and Airbnb to get the best data possible. 

These numbers seem low and you can usually find ways to outperform the competition by buying a great property in a great location and offering better amenities. 

  • John Underwood
  • Loading replies...