Skip to content
Two investors reviewing resources on a laptop

Get industry-leading resources — for free

Unlock resources for every investing strategy and stage with a free account.

By continuing, you agree to BiggerPockets LLC's Terms of Use and Privacy Policy

Followed Discussions Followed Categories Followed People Followed Locations
California Real Estate Q&A Discussion Forum
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

User Stats

4
Posts
0
Votes
Matthew Wright
0
Votes |
4
Posts

San Francisco- Multiunit building- legalizing 3rd unit

Matthew Wright
Posted

Hi BP members, I have a building in San Francisco that is classified as a 2 unit building, in reality it is x3 apartments, the ground floor work was done prior to acquisition and not permitted. I do not want to turn into a x3 unit building due to creation of HOA etc. Medium term I would likely look to combine the middle and lower units. For the ground floor (non-permitted) we need to do some bathroom improvements which are not presently to code. I would do these to current code standards, and other smaller alterations all to code, without gaining permits. Then when it comes time to legalize, looking to get everything approved at once, with the data point that it was built to code in the past. Does anyone have experience legalizing prior no-permitted additions in SF and can advise if this is a good or terrible idea?

Thanks!!

  • Matthew Wright
  • Most Popular Reply

    User Stats

    1,592
    Posts
    1,633
    Votes
    Amit M.
    • Rental Property Investor
    • San Francisco, CA
    1,633
    Votes |
    1,592
    Posts
    Amit M.
    • Rental Property Investor
    • San Francisco, CA
    Replied

    @Lawrence Leung yeah, that card is pretty scary. The equivalent of ambulance chasers of the housing industry in SF, I guess :(

    Good advice above btw. That person should get an architect that is familiar with S.F. Byzantine planning and landlording regulations. Definitely not a try it yourself affair!

    Most important thing: IF the city has no “records” of the inlaw (no NOV on it, no mention in rent board records), AND it’s not occupied, then the best thing to do is demo the kitchen right away! Get rid of the kitchen before any discussions with the city...otherwise you risk revealing to them yourself that it was an inlaw unit! (A Kitchen defines it as a “unit” vs just a few rooms downstairs.) Many times the illegal unit was never realized by the city, so just undo the kitchen and pretend it never existed. Much cleaner slate for presenting future developments to the city for approval. 

    Keep us posted on this forum if you proceed forwards. 

    Loading replies...