Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Try Pro Features for Free
Start your 7 day free trial. Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties.
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Amit M.

Amit M. has started 18 posts and replied 1532 times.

Post: Crew Enterprises DST Investors with suspended distributions please PM me

Amit M.Posted
  • Rental Property Investor
  • San Francisco, CA
  • Posts 1,584
  • Votes 1,622

Dang…so much for DSTs being “safe” investments almost by default/shattered that illusion…

Post: ADUs are the smartest rental investment in today’s booming housing market

Amit M.Posted
  • Rental Property Investor
  • San Francisco, CA
  • Posts 1,584
  • Votes 1,622

Just to chime in about ADU values for 2-4's in desirable areas (like Venice, and my location San Francisco). I'm quite sure that in SF adding a 3rd unit ADU would add at least $800 PSF resale value, if it was in a good neighborhood. Given the Venice rents you're quoting, I'm quite sure that your proposed ADU will comp out at way over $500 PSF. But check with RE agents who know the area well! One subtlety in the SF market, for instance, is that duplexes can be condo converted, so their $PSF is higher than triplexes. Look at comps carefully get several good agents POVs on the resale value of your added unit. When you're talking value of multi units it's quite different than turning an SFH into 2 units. Good luck, and let us know what you decide!

Post: ADUs are the smartest rental investment in today’s booming housing market

Amit M.Posted
  • Rental Property Investor
  • San Francisco, CA
  • Posts 1,584
  • Votes 1,622

@Marco Werner I’d also be careful with your $6k rental assumption. Units in a back yard generally rent for less than front mainstream units, as they are perceived as secondary add ons and without any street presence. Also you’re reducing yard space and privacy, which may affect the rents of the 2 front units as well. Plus the inevitable construction noise/dirt will affect your front units for quite some time. Overall there are many negatives to negotiate, all reducing your returns and considerably upping your hassle factors. Tread cautiously!

Post: ADUs are the smartest rental investment in today’s booming housing market

Amit M.Posted
  • Rental Property Investor
  • San Francisco, CA
  • Posts 1,584
  • Votes 1,622

@Dan H. yes I agree with you! Especially for SFH. For some multi family bldgs it may make some sense, but the ROI is much less than most people realize. In my market, San Francisco, it basically turns non rent controlled SFH into rent controlled "duplexes", so most people will pass on that alone. Furthermore they are a major PITA to get approved and are bloody expensive to build, even in a "blank slate" existing basement space (forget about new construction). Lastly, in any decent neighborhood they are seen as a white elephants- most buyers would prefer to expand the basement space of the SFH to a bigger home- and the value that you will add $PSF will be WAY HIGHER than a white elephant ADU. Nice try CA legislators seeking to "add housing" in CA, but a hard pass!

Post: Why I Encourage San Diego Locals to Invest Here First (Even if It’s More Expensive)

Amit M.Posted
  • Rental Property Investor
  • San Francisco, CA
  • Posts 1,584
  • Votes 1,622
Quote from @Dan H.:

Historically I have been very pro San Diego RE investing, but with the current rates and realistic underwriting (most underwriting has at best a poor guess of sustained maintenance/cap ex) is huge negative cash flow at investor LTV. And much worse at the real high LTV possible via OO.

if typical rent to purchase ratio is ~0.5% and a good ratio is 0.7%, these will be cash flow negative.  With the current rates and realistic underwriting you need better than 1% ratio local to have sustained cash flow.  This is a unicorn find.  

so my once ecstatic view of San Diego RE investing is tempered significantly. I believe REI can still do ok with value adds (but I question your thoughts on the brrrr as after a high LTV refi it will bleed cash) or long holds. Remember making money does not imply a decent ROI. If a property appreciates $50k, but is negative $36k (investor LTV) when allocating for sustained expenses) the return is far less than $50k (maybe $20k when including equity paydown). This return does not justify the work and risk. On $1m, 80% LTV means maybe $220k including closing costs to make 10%. That is about the S&P lifetime return but S&P is passive. Certain syndication have track record of double that return. However, my conservative underwriting has been depicting no near term appreciation since 2022 (fortunately we are still getting decent appreciation) and very little near term rent growth since 2022 (which has largely been accurate).

So you do a value add and obtain some sweat equity to enhance the early returns to spruce up the returns until rent growth can create cash flow or you purchase rent ready and recognize the early returns will be pathetic (maybe even negative) and plan to hold it long enough to achieve a good return.  I suspect virtually all local RE investors will do well with a hold of 10 years or longer.

Note prior to 2022, the cash flow picture was very different. Properties could be purchased with near term returns worthy of the effort and risk. Today, value add to achieve maybe 50% early accelerated return (10% of asset at 80% LTV). Maybe use accelerated depreciation to get additional early benefits. The negative cash flow bites into this early return but hopefully before the early return is consumed there is some positive cash flow that will increase most years (largest expense is fixed (P&i), property tax is near fixed).

You are correct about our evictions being near lowest in the country but if you only look at that, is it a result of quality tenants or the challenges of getting an eviction?  If you add we have near lowest delinquency rate in the country it shows that we have quality tenants.  We have quality tenants because there is a housing shortage.  A tenant with poor LL reference will have a difficult time finding quality housing in San Diego.  So tenants pay on time and take decent care of the units.

My view is residential RE is not passive or risk free.   The returns must beat passive options by a margin that warrants the work and risk.  I think this mostly requires value adds (more work) and hold time.

Good luck

Kinda late to the party, but I agree 100% with @Dan H. on this! Same thing in San Francisco IMO. I just don't think the squeeze is worth the juice these days. Interest rates, construction costs, insurance rates, city permitting hassles have all increased, while rents are still lower than peak years. I also think that the crazy high appreciation we had over the last 20-30 years will be tempered going forward. So you're looking at hitting singles, maybe doubles at best. But I like, and I am used to, hitting triples and home runs! So at this point I've kept my best properties debt free, and sold off other props where I didn't see a high appreciation/gentrification future. Frankly I've also reached "my number", so I am less inclined to take all the risks involved with BRRRR, especially in places like SF where tenant laws are not in your favor.

The only thing I would still highly recommend is for younger investors to do BRRRR on well purchased owner occupied 2-4 property. That gets them on the property ladder as well as a place to live. Done right that's still a solid pursuit IMO. Good luck out there!

Post: Advice Needed – Water Damage in My Apartment

Amit M.Posted
  • Rental Property Investor
  • San Francisco, CA
  • Posts 1,584
  • Votes 1,622

Talk to your insurance company. They should be the ones going after his insurance company. Have them do the leg work :)

Post: Problems w/ Allegiancy DST's? Alorica DST in Texas. RE Gain Fund LLC REIT 721.

Amit M.Posted
  • Rental Property Investor
  • San Francisco, CA
  • Posts 1,584
  • Votes 1,622

@Stuart Udis

agree
100
percent
——————
3words

Post: You are not Buying a Tenant. You are Buying a Tenant Base

Amit M.Posted
  • Rental Property Investor
  • San Francisco, CA
  • Posts 1,584
  • Votes 1,622

”As an investor, you aren't buying a tenant. You are buying a property that attracts a particular tenant base.”

Truth! And that is why I sold off in 2021-22 some properties after Covid killed (sic) the aspirational tenant base of lesser costal urban locations…all of a sudden the good tenants don’t want/need to live there anymore.

TLDR:

ghetto
gentrification
aborted
—————-
3words

Post: Is it really this bad with syndicators?

Amit M.Posted
  • Rental Property Investor
  • San Francisco, CA
  • Posts 1,584
  • Votes 1,622

Safe to say that many punters who invested in low cap rate syndication deals, especially during the peak of the hype, are getting schlonged right now. 

Post: Delaware Statutory Trust DST 1031 Difficulty Giving up control

Amit M.Posted
  • Rental Property Investor
  • San Francisco, CA
  • Posts 1,584
  • Votes 1,622

What Joel said, yes

DST industry cheerleaders, meh