Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime

Let's keep in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter for timely insights and actionable tips on your real estate journey.

By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions
Followed Discussions Followed Categories Followed People Followed Locations
Rehabbing & House Flipping
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 14 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

72
Posts
23
Votes
Ron K.
  • Professional
  • Altoona, PA
23
Votes |
72
Posts

Pull the plug?

Ron K.
  • Professional
  • Altoona, PA
Posted

I am under contract to buy a bank foreclosure that was built as a duplex but was made into a single family. I could close a few walls and it would be a duplex again (plus other work to rehab). The problem: The house is in a development with all other homes being single family. I received a call from one of the homeowners in the development who said he has a group of homeowners who will fight me if I try to make it a duplex again.

For the experienced flippers and RE investors. Is it best for me to walk on this one? If I walk I will lose my $1000 earnest money? I can't see anything good coming out of a lawsuit.

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

22,059
Posts
14,128
Votes
Jon Holdman#3 Real Estate Deal Analysis & Advice Contributor
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Mercer Island, WA
14,128
Votes |
22,059
Posts
Jon Holdman#3 Real Estate Deal Analysis & Advice Contributor
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Mercer Island, WA
ModeratorReplied

IMHO, and I'm not a lawyer, the "The property shall only be used for residential proposes" would not preclude making it a duplex. If it was used as a store or office then this clause might be an issue. But a duplex is residential.

Or, does he somehow think "residential" precludes rentals? That's also unlikely. If these is a clause saying houses can't be rented, he might have a leg to stand on.

Given you have $1000 on the line, I think it would be worthwhile to spend $200 for an hour of a lawyer's time.

If there is no legal basis for this suit, then this is, again IMHO, a "taking". The person is trying to take away a legitimate, legal use of this property because he doesn't like it. If there are no zoning or building restrictions, you could knock down the house and build as many apartments onto it as you could fit and it would still be "residential".

Loading replies...