Hi @Sasi Raj I have been busy rolling our property management over to another year, sorry for the delay!
I continue to use ACV coverage on my personal portfolio and have made a couple claims over the past 15 yrs investing in Toledo.
If you use ACV coverage plan on some legwork to establish the value of the claim (and don't make claims for anything small like a puncture in a roof). The adjuster will not do most of the work (and you don't want them to, your numbers will be far more profitable than theirs).
When you have a claim the issue is you have to establish the scope of the repair, THEN deduct the depreciated value of the items. (I don't know their tables by heart, this is just a ball park)
Hallway floor - 5 yrs old, 20 yr lifespan - you get 75% value
Wiring - 45 yrs old, 50 yr lifespan - 10% value
Drywall - 15 yrs old, 50 yr lifespan - 70% value
So you have to walk the job with the adjuster, define the scope of what they agree is part of the claim, then solicit bids to complete the work, then have the whole project reduced based on the lifespan calculation, and finally get a check.
I have been through about six claims in my portfolio and represented owners in about ten times that amount. In general we ensure the base quotes come through high-dollar restoration companies, we get maybe 65% of that amount, and the whole job is funded through a normal contractor with a few reductions in quality (no new hardwood floors, it becomes LVP for example).
As long as you have an experienced project / property manager on your side you will do nicely on claims.
Lastly, I chose ACV coverage for my portfolio because I am not hand-to-mouth broke...if a claim comes back a few grand short it's not a crisis. Personally, the cheaper coverage has proven appropriate in my case...each investor's position will be different of course!