Is the Houston market viable right now?

Is the Houston market viable right now?

Member since 2021 · 10 posts · 5 votes

I recently moved into a new home and was planning to deploy my existing home as a long term rental in the Katy area. I've been trying to fill the house, but took a closer look at the numbers as some things have changed and don't know what makes the most sense moving forward. I'll provide the financial picture below with as much detail as I know, but I'm new to the game so please let me know if I'm missing anything relevant.

Estimated home value: $275,000

Current equity in home: ~$114,000

Loan details: 20 year loan from 2021, 2.65% rate. P&I is ~$12,800 annually

Taxes and Insurance: Without the homestead exemption, taxes are projected to be ~$7,200 and my insurance just renewed at ~$3,000 for a landlord policy. Yes, this was shopped through a broker and by far the cheapest option, even with a high wind/hail deductible and no personal property coverage.

Rent: The current market supports $2,100/month in this neighborhood, we have not received any interest at a price above that. (This is a 2,450 sqft home built in 2005, 4 bed 3 bath. All major appliances included)

HOA and misc: HOA is ~$600/yr and I've adopted the 1% rule for maintenance, so ~$2,750/yr. Also assuming 1 month of vacancy to be conservative, so $2,100. All utilities are paid by tenant and also lawn care is their responsibility.

Management and agent: I am managing the property myself so have no outflows there, but will pay a one time placement fee to my agent equal to one month's rent, $2,100 when a tenant is found. I do not expect this to be a recurring amount.

Appreciation: This home appreciated quickly after I bought it in 2020 but has come down from its highs a couple years ago and has been relatively steady at ~8% lower than peak FMV. Given the market, I'm not counting on any appreciation in the short term.

My math brings me to a negative cash flow, despite having a very good rate compared to if I were to buy an equivalent property today at current rates.  That's also with no management, and I've pulled all the variable levers I can to minimize outflows.  I'm struggling to see if I'm missing something and to evaluate if I should keep this home and accept a bit of negative cash flow annually as it's offset by the principal paydown and tax benefits of the property, although the return on my equity is very low when compared to just throwing my equity in the stock market or simpler investments, or if I should sell the home and look for better SFHs to invest in, but that leads me to the title; is the market even viable when I'm already cash flow negative with a great rate vs buying new properties with a 3x rate? Any and all insight and advice is welcome, and thanks in advance!


Cash flow = $25,200 (gross rent) - $7,200 (taxes) - $3,000 (insurance) - $5,450 (opex) - $12,800 (debt service) = -$3,250/yr

2Reply
601 views

Most Popular Reply

Greg ScottPro Member
Rental Property Investor · SE Michigan · Member since 2014 · 4k+ posts · 6k+ votes
7mo

Often times our home does not make for a great rental.

I agree with your math with one outstanding questions:  Is the insurance cost what you were paying or is it the cost for landlord insurance?  The latter is cheaper because you aren't paying to cover contents.

Offsetting some of the negative cashflow would be a potential reduction in your income taxes. This is where it is helpful to have a CPA on your team.  They will know your personal situation and what deductions you qualify for.  If this property also reduced your income taxes $4K per year, you are effectively at a positive cashflow.

I would say this property is towards the big end of what makes a viable rental.  At 2450sf, yes you can get higher rent, but you also pay higher taxes and updating a unit with paint and carpet costs a lot more.  A 1200sf property will cost half as much for paint and carpet, but rents for more than half a 2400sf property.

Another consideration for you are capital gains taxes.  Since you lived in the property if you sell it, you won't have any capital gains tax.  But, if you hold it as a rental for 3+ years, now you will be paying capital gains tax.  

How depreciation is treated is another thing to discuss with a CPA.  You have some choices with depreciation and you can optimize your finances if you are buying a purposeful rental.  Converting a home to a rental can create a bit of a clunky financial situation.

See this reply in the discussion

23 Replies

Jump to latestLatest
  • Greg ScottPro Member
    Rental Property Investor · SE Michigan · Member since 2014 · 4k+ posts · 6k+ votes
    7mo

    Often times our home does not make for a great rental.

    I agree with your math with one outstanding questions:  Is the insurance cost what you were paying or is it the cost for landlord insurance?  The latter is cheaper because you aren't paying to cover contents.

    Offsetting some of the negative cashflow would be a potential reduction in your income taxes. This is where it is helpful to have a CPA on your team.  They will know your personal situation and what deductions you qualify for.  If this property also reduced your income taxes $4K per year, you are effectively at a positive cashflow.

    I would say this property is towards the big end of what makes a viable rental.  At 2450sf, yes you can get higher rent, but you also pay higher taxes and updating a unit with paint and carpet costs a lot more.  A 1200sf property will cost half as much for paint and carpet, but rents for more than half a 2400sf property.

    Another consideration for you are capital gains taxes.  Since you lived in the property if you sell it, you won't have any capital gains tax.  But, if you hold it as a rental for 3+ years, now you will be paying capital gains tax.  

    How depreciation is treated is another thing to discuss with a CPA.  You have some choices with depreciation and you can optimize your finances if you are buying a purposeful rental.  Converting a home to a rental can create a bit of a clunky financial situation.

    • Member since 2021 · 10 posts · 5 votes
      7mo
      Quote from @Greg Scott:

      Often times our home does not make for a great rental.

      I agree with your math with one outstanding questions:  Is the insurance cost what you were paying or is it the cost for landlord insurance?  The latter is cheaper because you aren't paying to cover contents.

      Offsetting some of the negative cashflow would be a potential reduction in your income taxes. This is where it is helpful to have a CPA on your team.  They will know your personal situation and what deductions you qualify for.  If this property also reduced your income taxes $4K per year, you are effectively at a positive cashflow.

      I would say this property is towards the big end of what makes a viable rental.  At 2450sf, yes you can get higher rent, but you also pay higher taxes and updating a unit with paint and carpet costs a lot more.  A 1200sf property will cost half as much for paint and carpet, but rents for more than half a 2400sf property.

      Another consideration for you are capital gains taxes.  Since you lived in the property if you sell it, you won't have any capital gains tax.  But, if you hold it as a rental for 3+ years, now you will be paying capital gains tax.  

      How depreciation is treated is another thing to discuss with a CPA.  You have some choices with depreciation and you can optimize your finances if you are buying a purposeful rental.  Converting a home to a rental can create a bit of a clunky financial situation.


       Hey Greg, thanks for the reply.  The insurance is a new landlord policy, not my personal policy any longer.  I also understand your point that when it comes to maintenance costs that a smaller home would have a relatively smaller impact, but if house prices have appreciated and I pay $200k for a much smaller house with $40k down (same equity position as current) but it now generates less rent and also has higher debt costs, then how does any new deal make better sense than this property, which is already bleeding?  I am actually a CPA myself so I understand the numbers and am not considering any sentimental value in the equation, but the home piece of the puzzle aside I just don't understand how anything else would end up being a better deal if I decided to move on from this property and get into something new.  I've looked at properties all over the west side of Houston and the rent to purchase price ratios are not even close to what I would consider viable to cash flow.

  • Wale LawalBusiness Member
    Real Estate Broker · Houston | Dallas | Austin, TX · Member since 2018 · 5k+ posts · 2k+ votes
    7mo

    @Ryan Richards

    The market in Katy, Texas is pretty normal for your properties. Many single-family homes for rent are not doing great because taxes and insurance are going up.. You have a good thing going with that 2.65% loan. It is really important for your business because investors get to keep their properties by paying back the loan and getting tax breaks. The property is still an idea because you can handle losing about 270 dollars each month. The property is getting valuable and rental rates are going up in the Houston area so it is creating value over time.

    Good luck!

  • Member since 2021 · 10 posts · 5 votes
    7mo

    @Wale Lawal I appreciate your response.  Sounds like this is kinda the status quo in this market right now, but it also sounds like you think long term it's worth still holding onto this property even given current market conditions cause the appreciation and rent should go up in the medium to long term.  I do need to balance this against the opportunity cost of selling with no capital gains, but I can always 1031 later so I'm not overly concerned with that.

    • Wale LawalBusiness Member
      Real Estate Broker · Houston | Dallas | Austin, TX · Member since 2018 · 5k+ posts · 2k+ votes
      7mo
      Quote from @Ryan Richards:

      @Wale Lawal I appreciate your response.  Sounds like this is kinda the status quo in this market right now, but it also sounds like you think long term it's worth still holding onto this property even given current market conditions cause the appreciation and rent should go up in the medium to long term.  I do need to balance this against the opportunity cost of selling with no capital gains, but I can always 1031 later so I'm not overly concerned with that.


       Great. You have answered your own concerns yourself. Keep us posted on your decision.

  • Dave FosterBusiness Member
    Qualified Intermediary for 1031 Exchanges · St. Petersburg, FL · Member since 2013 · 9k+ posts · 9k+ votes
    7mo

    @Ryan Richards, you're absolutely right! It's all about opportunity costs. Holding onto an investment property for appreciation potential is not a terrible deal as long as you can cover any capital expenses that might come up in the future. Do you need the cash flow? Your competing decision points are giving up that rate to buy better cash flow somewhere else with a better tax structure and rent prospects. Sometimes it's not worth holding onto a rate. But sometimes the IRR, which includes the amortization of the loan and appreciation make up way more than you make in cash flow.

    If you decide to just sell the property, you might qualify for the primary residence exclusion, which allows you to take the first $250k ($500k if married) of the gain tax-free. This would allow you to deploy that equity where you might get some better cash flow potential. Even if you convert the property to a rental, you still have exactly three years to take advantage of the exclusion if you decide to sell the property.

    If you don't qualify for the tax-free primary residence exclusion, then you can still 1031 down the line into a better property and keep the tax deferred.

    But 100K tax-free money right now vs negative cash flow????

    The 1031 Investor5140 Reviews
  • Member since 2021 · 10 posts · 5 votes
    7mo

    @Dave Foster thanks for taking the time to read and reply!  I don't actively need any additional cash flow from this property; my family is comfortable with my job and I would be fine long term letting appreciation do its job, but I do want to work toward building a portfolio that cash flows enough to replace my W-2 income.  

    The house is section 121 qualifying, and I moved out as primary residence in June 2025, so I still have a couple years to make that move if I want to.  $100k tax free is certainly tempting, but I probably have a degree of analysis paralysis in deciding if I truly can find better returns elsewhere if I sold and deployed that capital in the current economy.  

    That ultimately leads me back to the original question of whether anything in the Houston market makes sense right now, or if we are just in a part of the cycle where there aren't really any good deals to be had and I should wait while building up a cash stockpile, whether that looks like keeping this house and betting the slight appreciation in the next couple of years offsets the negative cash flow, or selling and sitting on that cash in addition to my excess W-2 income.  That's where my lack of experience is hurting me and I could use additional perspectives.  But again, thank you for taking the time to reply and offer your thoughts; it's much appreciated!

  • Real Estate Agent · Houston, TX · Member since 2022 · 135 posts · 84 votes
    7mo

    Adding to all the good input that has been mentioned above ( especially Section 121 and other tax considerations), It may be beneficial to consider your investment strategy as a whole and if keeping this as a rental would help you diversify away from the traditional investment vehicles (stock,bonds,ect..).

    Also consider monthly principal pay down (as minimal as it may be) into your consideration. 

    My thoughts would be to keep it, as a diversification tool, as long as you aren't loosing money each month. Your low interest rate is powerful here and with section 121, you could always keep it as a rental for the next 4 years or so and then sell it "tax free". 

    I'm a central Houston builder/developer, Investor and Realtor. Reach out in messages with any other direct questions. 

    - Chris Kersey 

  • Property Manager · Katy, TX · Member since 2015 · 1k+ posts · 1k+ votes
    7mo
    Quote from @Ryan Richards:

    I recently moved into a new home and was planning to deploy my existing home as a long term rental in the Katy area. I've been trying to fill the house, but took a closer look at the numbers as some things have changed and don't know what makes the most sense moving forward. I'll provide the financial picture below with as much detail as I know, but I'm new to the game so please let me know if I'm missing anything relevant.

    Estimated home value: $275,000

    Current equity in home: ~$114,000

    Loan details: 20 year loan from 2021, 2.65% rate. P&I is ~$12,800 annually

    Taxes and Insurance: Without the homestead exemption, taxes are projected to be ~$7,200 and my insurance just renewed at ~$3,000 for a landlord policy. Yes, this was shopped through a broker and by far the cheapest option, even with a high wind/hail deductible and no personal property coverage.

    Rent: The current market supports $2,100/month in this neighborhood, we have not received any interest at a price above that. (This is a 2,450 sqft home built in 2005, 4 bed 3 bath. All major appliances included)

    HOA and misc: HOA is ~$600/yr and I've adopted the 1% rule for maintenance, so ~$2,750/yr. Also assuming 1 month of vacancy to be conservative, so $2,100. All utilities are paid by tenant and also lawn care is their responsibility.

    Management and agent: I am managing the property myself so have no outflows there, but will pay a one time placement fee to my agent equal to one month's rent, $2,100 when a tenant is found. I do not expect this to be a recurring amount.

    Appreciation: This home appreciated quickly after I bought it in 2020 but has come down from its highs a couple years ago and has been relatively steady at ~8% lower than peak FMV. Given the market, I'm not counting on any appreciation in the short term.

    My math brings me to a negative cash flow, despite having a very good rate compared to if I were to buy an equivalent property today at current rates.  That's also with no management, and I've pulled all the variable levers I can to minimize outflows.  I'm struggling to see if I'm missing something and to evaluate if I should keep this home and accept a bit of negative cash flow annually as it's offset by the principal paydown and tax benefits of the property, although the return on my equity is very low when compared to just throwing my equity in the stock market or simpler investments, or if I should sell the home and look for better SFHs to invest in, but that leads me to the title; is the market even viable when I'm already cash flow negative with a great rate vs buying new properties with a 3x rate? Any and all insight and advice is welcome, and thanks in advance!


    Cash flow = $25,200 (gross rent) - $7,200 (taxes) - $3,000 (insurance) - $5,450 (opex) - $12,800 (debt service) = -$3,250/yr

    Hey Ryan,

    We're seeing the same thing especially with new construction. Investors are getting great rates and a new property but there's very little, if any, cash flow.

    Even with the low rate, as @Greg Scott mentioned above, some properties just don't make great rentals.

    I would ask, "Why are you investing?"

    If it's for long-term growth then I would sell the property and put that cast in the market. With average returns of 10%, compounded over 40 or 50 years, it's a lot more money than the house will make you. And selling with no capital gains is hard to beat!

    However if your goal is to diversify, offset income, inflation play, or the eventual cash flow, then I would keep the property.

    Best of luck! 

    • Member since 2021 · 10 posts · 5 votes
      7mo

      @Cameron Tope thanks for taking the time to answer! I appreciate each of these considerations and you've done a great job laying out the options and benefits in a really clear way that makes it easier to evaluate relative value. 

    • Property Manager · Katy, TX · Member since 2015 · 1k+ posts · 1k+ votes
      7mo
      Quote from @Ryan Richards:

      @Cameron Tope thanks for taking the time to answer! I appreciate each of these considerations and you've done a great job laying out the options and benefits in a really clear way that makes it easier to evaluate relative value. 


       Happy to help!

  • Daniel TanasaBusiness Member
    Realtor · Houston, TX · Member since 2019 · 351 posts · 174 votes
    6mo
    Quote from @Ryan Richards:

    I recently moved into a new home and was planning to deploy my existing home as a long term rental in the Katy area. I've been trying to fill the house, but took a closer look at the numbers as some things have changed and don't know what makes the most sense moving forward. I'll provide the financial picture below with as much detail as I know, but I'm new to the game so please let me know if I'm missing anything relevant.

    Estimated home value: $275,000

    Current equity in home: ~$114,000

    Loan details: 20 year loan from 2021, 2.65% rate. P&I is ~$12,800 annually

    Taxes and Insurance: Without the homestead exemption, taxes are projected to be ~$7,200 and my insurance just renewed at ~$3,000 for a landlord policy. Yes, this was shopped through a broker and by far the cheapest option, even with a high wind/hail deductible and no personal property coverage.

    Rent: The current market supports $2,100/month in this neighborhood, we have not received any interest at a price above that. (This is a 2,450 sqft home built in 2005, 4 bed 3 bath. All major appliances included)

    HOA and misc: HOA is ~$600/yr and I've adopted the 1% rule for maintenance, so ~$2,750/yr. Also assuming 1 month of vacancy to be conservative, so $2,100. All utilities are paid by tenant and also lawn care is their responsibility.

    Management and agent: I am managing the property myself so have no outflows there, but will pay a one time placement fee to my agent equal to one month's rent, $2,100 when a tenant is found. I do not expect this to be a recurring amount.

    Appreciation: This home appreciated quickly after I bought it in 2020 but has come down from its highs a couple years ago and has been relatively steady at ~8% lower than peak FMV. Given the market, I'm not counting on any appreciation in the short term.

    My math brings me to a negative cash flow, despite having a very good rate compared to if I were to buy an equivalent property today at current rates.  That's also with no management, and I've pulled all the variable levers I can to minimize outflows.  I'm struggling to see if I'm missing something and to evaluate if I should keep this home and accept a bit of negative cash flow annually as it's offset by the principal paydown and tax benefits of the property, although the return on my equity is very low when compared to just throwing my equity in the stock market or simpler investments, or if I should sell the home and look for better SFHs to invest in, but that leads me to the title; is the market even viable when I'm already cash flow negative with a great rate vs buying new properties with a 3x rate? Any and all insight and advice is welcome, and thanks in advance!


    Cash flow = $25,200 (gross rent) - $7,200 (taxes) - $3,000 (insurance) - $5,450 (opex) - $12,800 (debt service) = -$3,250/yr


     Hi Ryan, 

    Making numbers work today is definitely harder than it use to be, especially if you have to pay over 6% interest rate. If you don't need the money, I think holding on to the property makes a lot of sense at 2.65% interest rate. The inflation is around 3% so you're basically having free money for it. The house is in a good area and over time it will appreciate and cashflow will get better. Make sure you underwrite the tenants good, have them stay for as long as possible and your cashflow number will get better as you don't have the marketing and vacancy cost. 

    Good luck! 

  • Jesus SuarezBusiness Member
    Lender · TX, FL · Member since 2025 · 131 posts · 57 votes
    4mo

    Hello Ryan, give us an update, did you keep the property?  I am late to this post and I hope you didn't sell it, with that rate versus inflation as Daniel says, it is literally free money, the market will improve over time and your property is appreciating, in value, remember that Real Estate is a long term business! 

    • Member since 2021 · 10 posts · 5 votes
      4mo

      @Jesus Suarez thanks for checking on this- I did not sell the property and finally got it rented after 4 months of vacancy.  I do appreciate that real estate is generally a long term play, but with the consideration of the section 121 looming within a couple years I have to evaluate on that potential timeline rather than 15+ years. Thanks for your thoughts and taking the time to share them! 

  • Realtor · Granbury, TX · Member since 2026 · 8 posts · 3 votes
    4mo

    Ryan, I think the hard part is separating a good mortgage from a good rental.

    That 2.65% rate is a real advantage, but your own numbers are still showing the house may be a tougher rental than it looks at first glance. Once you add the loss of the homestead exemption, landlord insurance, vacancy, maintenance and tenant placement cost, the low rate is helping, but not enough to make the cash flow clean.

    I would not frame it only as “is Houston viable?” I’d ask whether this specific house fits the portfolio you want to build. A larger former primary home can be a good long-term hold, but it can also tie up equity that may work better somewhere else.

    Since you still have the Section 121 window, I would compare that potential sale option against keeping a slightly negative rental and counting on appreciation, rent growth and principal paydown to make up the difference.

    • Member since 2021 · 10 posts · 5 votes
      4mo

      @Josh Shelton thanks for sharing your experience and thoughts; a lot of what you mentioned is exactly why I asked that question the way I did in the first place.  If I can't make the numbers work on a property I already own with a low rate, why would I expect anything with comparable costs but a much higher rate to work in the current market as an alternative deployment of the capital? I do currently plan on selling within my Section 121 window in a couple of years, so I guess I have that time to continue to evaluate the market and look for better deals.

  • Basit SiddiqiBusiness Member
    Accountant · New York, NY · Member since 2015 · 8k+ posts · 3k+ votes
    4mo

    Why is your debt service so high?
    Are you double counting the real estate taxes / Insurance or possibly paying a lot towards principal paydown?

    What did you originally buy the home for and what is the loan balance?
    If the loan balance is $200,000, the interest should only be about $5,000.

    I personally wouldn't count the principal paydown as part of the income statement and determing whether to buy / sell.

    My parents live in Katy and I visit them often. A lot of people from Houston praise Katy and the Woodlands as the places to live. 

    Katy is safe and has good school districts. The city has changed a lot over the last 5 years with more commercial stores openin gup(near the 99 Highway atleast.).

    I would personally hold the property
    I think you would be cash-flow positive if you don't factor in the principal paydown and if you appreciate 4% annually, you are making about $8,000 - $12,000 annually.

    • Member since 2021 · 10 posts · 5 votes
      4mo

      @Basit Siddiqi I'm not sure what you mean on the debt service- principal is a little over $700 a month currently and interest sitting right over $350.  Escrow is not included in that but is over $700/month to service the taxes and insurance.  I'm not paying any extra principal; these are minimum numbers.  

      The original loan was for $198k, and I agree with everything you're saying about Katy- I think it's a long term great place to live and hold property, but with the section 121 window closing in the next couple years I have to consider if holding in that window is the best option if I'm going to exercise it at all, or just hold the property indefinitely.

  • Property Manager · Houston · Member since 2026 · 30 posts · 17 votes
    4mo

    You’re asking the right question, and your math is actually pretty solid for where you’re at.

    A couple things I’d zoom out on:

    First, on paper cash flow alone, this is not a strong deal. But that’s pretty normal for a 2.65% asset in today’s rate environment. The real drivers in a case like this are principal paydown, tax treatment, and long-term rent growth in Katy rather than monthly cash flow.

    Second, the key decision point isn’t just “cash flow vs sell,” it’s return on equity. You’ve built a significant equity position, and the real question is whether that equity is being deployed efficiently relative to what you could earn elsewhere after taxes and transaction costs.

    Third, the “viability of Houston” piece gets misunderstood a lot. Houston can be a strong rental market, but it’s very sensitive to entry price, insurance, and tax basis. A property that made sense at 2020 pricing can look structurally different today even in the same submarket.

    If I were stress testing this, I’d model three scenarios:

    1. Hold and optimize rent annually with market resets
    2. Hold for amortization and long-term appreciation in Katy specifically
    3. Sell and redeploy equity into a higher cash-flowing position or diversified strategy

    The answer usually comes down to which of those three you believe most in over the next 3–5 years, not just this year’s cash flow.

    Best of luck!

  • Member since 2026 · 76 posts · 30 votes
    3mo

    The -$3,250/yr by itself doesn't answer keep-vs-sell — what answers it is which Katy you own, because "Katy" is two markets wearing one name. Pull the 2024 census-tract data (free on data.census.gov, tables B25064 gross rent / B25077 home value) and the split is stark: in 77449 north of I-10, median tract rent is about $1,900 against a median tract value around $262K; on the 77494/Cinco Ranch side it's roughly $2,357 against $460K. Rent is only ~24% higher for a house that costs ~76% more. The north side is structurally a cash-flow submarket, the south side structurally isn't, and no amount of expense-trimming changes which one you're holding.

    Your $2,100 rent on a ~$275K basis actually puts you on the north-side, cash-flow end of that split — roughly a 9% gross yield — which is the half where keeping can pencil. That frames what the negative carry can and can't fix. Across the ~60 Katy-area tracts (77449/50/93/94), median rent grew roughly 4%/yr from 2019 to 2024 (about $1,630 to $2,020). On your $2,100 rent that's around $80/mo of organic growth per year against your ~$270/mo gap, so call it a bit over 3 years to breakeven if expenses held still — and in Texas they haven't; taxes and insurance have been eating most of that. Rent growth alone probably doesn't rescue this on a timeline you'd enjoy.

    Whether appreciation rescues it is the real question, and the honest read cuts both ways. Same 2019-2024 window: median value across those tracts rose ~39% while median rent rose low-20s percent — returns in Katy have been mostly appreciation, not cash flow, so holding at negative carry is an appreciation bet whether you frame it that way or not. The demand side of that bet is real (Census puts Fort Bend County +18% and Waller +23% from 2020 to 2025, and Katy sits right on that corridor). The catch is that the same corridor is where builders keep delivering, so your resale rental competes with brand-new product a few miles west — a big part of why rent lagged value so badly.

    So the mechanical move: look up your exact tract, check whether its own rent/value history looks like the 77449 profile or the 77494 profile, and re-run the hold case with realistic tax and insurance escalation instead of flat expenses. A higher-yield-side house at ~9% gross like yours can pencil once rent growth closes the gap. A low-yield 77494-type asset at negative carry means you're paying $3,250/yr to hold an appreciation bet that already paid out once — I'd want a specific reason to believe it repeats before renewing that ticket.

  • Alyssa MarquezBusiness Member
    Real Estate Agent · San Antonio TX / Fort Lauderdale, FL · Member since 2023 · 126 posts · 31 votes
    3mo

    Your math looks reasonable, and I think you've identified the key issue: it's not the 2.65% mortgage that's hurting the deal—it's the combination of property taxes, insurance, and relatively modest rents. If it doesn't cash flow with that interest rate, it's unlikely to work as a new purchase at today's rates.

    That doesn't necessarily mean you should sell. I'd also consider principal paydown, depreciation, long-term appreciation potential, and what you'd do with the equity if you sold. But if your goal is to build a portfolio with strong cash flow, redeploying that equity into a market with better rent-to-price ratios could produce a much better return. Sometimes a property is a great home but only an average rental.

Join the conversationCreate a free account to reply, vote on answers and follow this thread.