Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Real Estate Deal Analysis & Advice
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 8 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

51
Posts
38
Votes
Rob Roy
  • Agent Sales Representative at BiggerPockets
  • Fort Collins, CO
38
Votes |
51
Posts

Adding a Closing Costs Clause - Thoughts??

Rob Roy
  • Agent Sales Representative at BiggerPockets
  • Fort Collins, CO
Posted

In my recent search to buy a new primary residence in an out-of-state market, I wanted to apply what I think to be a great addition to the offer contract.  I heard it from Keith Weinhold on his Get Rich Education Podcast and literately stopped what I was doing just to write it down.  He said that in every offer he submits, he includes the phrase "The seller will pay allowable buyer's closing costs, prepaids, prorations and all lender allowable expenses."  Thanks Keith!

So naturally when I put an offer in on a house in Maryland, I told my real estate agent to include this.  She told me it was completely irrelevant - that part of my offer already included that the seller will pay 3% of the closing costs - the maximum allowed amount in that state.  And then I talked to the lender I was dealing with at the time (her preferred lender) and told him the same thing and he said that he agrees with the realtor as it's completely unnecessary.

Now, this was not a house I was going to flip, but rather a home that I would be moving in to (and they didn't end up accepting the offer anyway).  I have since parted ways with this realtor because we did not see eye to eye on a lot of issues, this being one of them.  I want to buy a primary residence that I can house hack and made it very clear I'm trying to purchase the property from an investor mentality and she clearly wanted a young couple to come to town, fall in love with a house right away and get her commission - but that's a story for another time.

Am I out to lunch here? I think it's a great phrase to include, even if it is redundant.  However, I am brand new to this and still don't know what I don't know, you know?

Thanks! 

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

17,615
Posts
30,463
Votes
Russell Brazil
  • Real Estate Agent
  • Washington, D.C.
30,463
Votes |
17,615
Posts
Russell Brazil
  • Real Estate Agent
  • Washington, D.C.
ModeratorReplied

Depends on what part of Maryland. Areas close to DC, simply put no listing agent would take your contract because the phrasing does not allow for a definitive amount. Your fees with the lender could be infinite, so then say if you were using an FHA loan, the phrasing would automatically go to the maximum of 6%.

Maximum subsidy on other loans is 3% for owner occupants, so as your lender and realtor told you, there simply is no reason to try to add any other phrasing to the contract.

The 3% is not state specific, it's Fannie/Freddie underwriting guidelines.

Also by going to the maximum, you leave yourself no negotiating power post home inspection as the listing agent knows the subsidy can not be increased.

business profile image
District Invest Group
5.0 stars
43 Reviews

Loading replies...