Skip to content

Let's keep in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter for timely insights and actionable tips on your real estate journey.

By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions
Followed Discussions Followed Categories Followed People Followed Locations
Managing Your Property
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated 6 months ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

15
Posts
1
Votes
Audrey C.
  • Hartford, CT
1
Votes |
15
Posts

Property Manager Fee structure

Audrey C.
  • Hartford, CT
Posted

In my search for a PM for my LTR (which I may turn into a STR at some point) Wondering if this fee/billing structure is reasonable and/or ordinary. The company I'm talking to now has this structure in lieu of a standard % of the rental income:

monthly retainer $250 for priority response/availability
turnover inspection $180/turnover
maintenance labor rate $85
materials billed at cost +20%
sub coordination cost + 20%

Anyone with experience both ways and have a preference to either structure?

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

305
Posts
209
Votes
Charles Clark
  • Real Estate Broker
  • Milwaukee, WI
209
Votes |
305
Posts
Charles Clark
  • Real Estate Broker
  • Milwaukee, WI
Replied

@Audrey C.

This fee structure isn’t unusual, but it really depends on the level of service they provide. A flat retainer can work well if your rent is higher or if you want guaranteed availability, but the add-on costs can add up—especially the 20% on materials and subs. I’d compare their total estimated yearly cost to a standard % model to see which makes more financial sense for your property.

Loading replies...