Updated about 3 hours ago on . Most recent reply
How are you prioritizing distressed leads before skip tracing?
A big lead list can be a trap.
If I pull 5,000 “distressed” properties, I don’t really have 5,000 leads. I have 5,000 records that still need to be sorted.
The useful question is not just whether the owner is absentee, high equity, tax delinquent, or in pre-foreclosure.
It’s why this property is worth researching before the next one.
That could be repeat code issues, long-open violations, tax pressure, vacancy, failed listings, bad ownership history, or some other sign that the property has become a headache.
I’m interested in how other people are filtering before they spend money on skip tracing, mail, or calls. What actually moves a property to the top of your list?
Most Popular Reply
great point on the pre-market side. For off-market leads I look for a combination of signals before spending any outreach budget — vacancy indicators, tax delinquency, code violations, and absentee owners tend to cluster together. A landlord showing up in two or three of those categories at once is almost always worth the call. The more distress signals stacking on one property the higher I prioritize it. Still refining my system but that layered approach has been the most efficient filter so far.



