Skip to content

Let's keep in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter for timely insights and actionable tips on your real estate journey.

By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions
BPCON2026 Orlando

October 2 - 4 Early Bird tickets are now ON SALE. Purchase your tickets today and save $100!

Get tickets
BPCON2026 Orlando

October 2 - 4 Early Bird tickets are now ON SALE. Purchase your tickets today and save $100!

Get tickets
Followed Discussions Followed Categories Followed People Followed Locations
Wholesaling
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 20 hours ago on .

User Stats

82
Posts
14
Votes
Chris Arnold
  • Investor
  • Nationwide
14
Votes |
82
Posts

Is Skip Tracing really the problem, or is it what you do next?

Chris Arnold
  • Investor
  • Nationwide
Posted

I keep seeing people blame skip tracing when outbound campaigns underperform, and sometimes that’s fair.

But I’m starting to think the bigger issue is what happens after the skip trace comes back.

A provider may return 3, 4, or 5 phone numbers for an owner, but that doesn’t mean the data is actually useful yet.

The real questions are:

  • Is this the right owner?
  • Is the owner match current?
  • Are the top numbers actually tied to that person?
  • Is the property individually owned or buried behind an LLC/trust?
  • Which number should the caller try first?
  • Which records should be worked first at all?

A raw skip trace file can look complete but still waste a ton of caller time if there’s no confidence or priority layer behind it.

Curious how others handle this:

Once your skip trace comes back, do your callers just work the file as-is, or do you have a process for cleaning/ranking the records before outreach starts?