Skip to content

Let's keep in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter for timely insights and actionable tips on your real estate journey.

By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions
Followed Discussions Followed Categories Followed People Followed Locations
Insurance
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 9 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

374
Posts
27
Votes
Ben C.
  • Metuchen, NJ
27
Votes |
374
Posts

Vacant policy vs builders risk

Ben C.
  • Metuchen, NJ
Posted
Hello, Can someone shed some light on this for me. What is the difference between a vacant home policy and a builders risk policy? I am deciding between a gut Reno/addition and a tear down to the basement. My insurance agent told me the vacant home policy is applicable if I go the first route and builders risk if I go the second route (tear down to basement foundation). Do you agree? I will be GC and hiring the subs to do the work in order to save $. Thoughts? Thank you!

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

1,817
Posts
832
Votes
Patrick Liska
  • Investor
  • Verona, NJ
832
Votes |
1,817
Posts
Patrick Liska
  • Investor
  • Verona, NJ
Replied

Not an insurance agent but i believe the difference is, the Vacant policy covers the existing structure plus improvements as they are done. the builders risk insures the material and i believe aspects of the project as it is built, since there is no structure. so if you happen to take a builders risk and you are doing reno, it may not cover you for the existing structure .

  • Patrick Liska
  • Loading replies...