House hackers: are you planning your financing past deal #1?
I got started investing through house hacking and did multiple owner occupied purchases. Now that I'm on the mortgage side and work with a lot of house hackers, one thing I've realized is how little people think about financing deal #2 and #3 when they're buying deal #1.
Everyone focuses on "how little can I put down?" which obviously matters.
But I've seen the bigger issue come later.
How will you qualify for the next property?
Can you use rental income from the house you're leaving?
Will your DTI still work?
Did you actually meet the occupancy requirements on the current loan?
I've even had someone try to buy their next house hack before a year was up and underwriting really scrutinized the file because of how recently they purchased their current primary.
House hacking is still one of my favorite ways to get started investing and building wealth. It's how I started. But if your goal is to repeat it, I think you should be planning ahead once you get that first one closed.
Curious for people who have house hacked multiple times, what became the biggest hurdle when you went to buy the next one?
Most Popular Reply
I think this is exactly right, and I’d actually push it one step further.
Deal #1 should be underwritten partly based on what it does to your ability to buy deal #2.
The lowest down payment isn’t always the best financing decision if it leaves you with a payment that crushes your DTI or drains the reserves you’ll need six months later.
The other thing people underestimate is how different “this property rents for $X” is from “underwriting will give me credit for $X.”
Lease history, tax returns, current occupancy, how long you’ve owned it, and the loan program can all matter.
If the goal is three house hacks instead of one, I’d map the financing path for all three before buying the first one.
You don’t need to predict everything. You just don’t want deal #1 accidentally blocking deal #2.