The Risk Paradox: How (& Why) Investors Fail to Gauge Investment Risk Correctly

The Risk Paradox: How (& Why) Investors Fail to Gauge Investment Risk Correctly

3 min read
Erion Shehaj

Erion Shehaj is the founder of Investing Architect and a managing real estate broker at Signature Houston Real Estate Corp.

Experience
Erion helps successful professionals achieve financial independence using the Blueprint Real Estate Investing Strategy. By combining the principles of robust financial planning with quality real estate investments, Erion can show you how to replace your salary with passive income and retire early so you can live life on your terms.

Over his real estate career of 13-plus years, Erion has helped his investor clients purchase $90MM+ in real estate assets to build robust real estate portfolios and streams of passive income. In addition, he has been involved in successfully rolling out small multifamily new construction projects across Texas.

Erion has written extensively about long-term real estate investing and business in several publications, including BiggerPockets (since 2013), Investing Architect, American Genius, Geek Estate, and more.

Education
Erion graduated Magna Cum Laude with a double bachelor’s in Accounting and Finance from the Bauer College of Business (University of Houston) in 2004.

Accreditations
Erion completed the prestigious Certified Commercial Investment Member education curriculum (CCIM 101­104). In 2017, Erion successfully completed the coursework for the Certified Financial Planner Program at the Susan M. Glasscock School of Continuing Studies at Rice University.

Follow
Twitter @invarchitect
LinkedIn

Read More

As a Guest you have free article(s) left

Join BiggerPockets (for free!) and get access to real estate investing tips, market updates, and exclusive email content.

Sign in Already a member?

After rigorous research, you have narrowed down your options to two potential investments. The first is a new construction duplex priced in the mid $300,000s. It is located in a market with strong fundamentals and good growth prospects. Between down payment and closing costs, you would invest approximately $92,000 to complete its acquisition. The second is a recently built single family home priced at $180k. It is located in an established neighborhood with good schools. The required capital investment for this property is just under $50,000. You currently have $500k in available, investable capital.

Based on the case study I just laid out, which deal feels riskier to you?

If you’re like the overwhelming majority of investors, you would say the duplex feels like the riskier of the two deals. You have just fallen prey to the risk paradox.

real-estate-risk

The Risk Paradox

The reason why the single family property feels like a much safer bet is because it requires a smaller capital investment. But the amount of capital invested in the property has no bearing on the risk of that investment. In the case study, the investor has sufficient capital on hand, so you are not going “all in.”

Think about it this way: A $10 million shopping center in a prime location is a lower risk investment than a $30,000 house in a dilapidated neighborhood.

Related: The 4 Main Risks of Owning Rental Properties (& How to Mitigate Them!)

You might argue that not putting all your eggs in one basket and spreading your capital over multiple properties reduces risk. That point is well taken. But that’s not why the investment feels riskier almost instantaneously. When we evaluate risk on autopilot, we tend to imagine the worst case scenario: What would total loss look like? When you frame the issue that way, it makes perfect sense that if you have to lose it all, it’s much better to lose less than more. But a seasoned real estate investor recognizes that framing the issue in that manner is a bias that leads to a misguided assessment of investment risk.

vacation-rental-risk

So What’s the Best Way to Assess Risk in a Real Estate Investment?

If you want to properly evaluate risk in an investment, you must first clearly define what you stand to lose. When you invest your capital in purchasing an investment property, you have two return expectations: return ON investment and return OF investment. In other words, you are hoping that the property will produce a return on your invested capital via cashflow and a return of your invested capital when you sell the property.

Related: Don’t Let the Risk of Investing in Real Estate Paralyze You: Here’s How

Put simply, risk is uncertainty. Risk is the probability that either of those outcomes will not materialize as expected. When you perform due diligence, you’re actually trying to determine the risk that your investment will not produce cash flow or that (even worse) you will not recoup your invested capital back. For example, when you purchase an older property, you might underestimate repairs, and the cash flow you thought you would receive will actually cover those unexpected costs. Or if you purchase a property in a neighborhood where values are declining over time, you risk that when you sell your capital, it will not be returned to you in full.

The factors that determine risk are the same factors that determine returns: quality of location, construction, schools, tenants, market. It’s not the amount invested or the purchase price. So when you are sizing up a deal, pay attention to the quality of that asset, its ability to attract great tenants, and the overall market prospects for growth. If all three are present, you are dealing with a lower risk investment than a property that requires a smaller cash infusion but doesn’t possess those qualities.

How do YOU assess risk? Do you agree with the above?

Let me know with a comment!