Updated 5 months ago on . Most recent reply
- Lender
- 1,628
- Votes |
- 5,770
- Posts
Why do some investors purchase sub-$100k properties?
Are these properties really that profitable? When I look at the numbers of these properties it seems like a few couple hundred dollars in cash flow and thousands of dollars in fees, repairs, and maintenance?
Wouldn't it be better to park $40k in a high interest savings account or the S&P 500? Is this more of an income tax strategy? I am just confused as to why some investors buy these kinds of homes?
- Erik Estrada
- [email protected]
- 818-269-7983
Most Popular Reply
- Lender
- Charleston, SC
- 1,126
- Votes |
- 1,316
- Posts
I get a ton of calls from clients wanting loans on these. It's almost always one of two reasons - either that's all they can afford in their current financial position, or it's because of underwriting/analysis that's entirely theoretical and ungrounded. Stuff like "I underwrote 10% for capex" which is $700/yr on a $70k property, or "cash on cash is 22%" which translates to barely $100/month. Sounds good on a line-itemed spreadsheet, but this is detachded from reality. The vast majority of sub-$100k properties are traps.



