Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
General Landlording & Rental Properties
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 6 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

481
Posts
170
Votes
Jeff Gates
  • Investor
  • Cathedral City, CA
170
Votes |
481
Posts

Tenant screening beware

Jeff Gates
  • Investor
  • Cathedral City, CA
Posted

Today it was found criminal and eviction results are flawed if applicant enters wrong data. A landlord has no visibility with this issue and the CRA does not care. 

This applies to all vendors an all CRA's. 

As a landlord, I can only remedy this issue somewhat by having applicants use two different vendors and double up on the background screening. Seems wrong, but it is not.

In theory it can happen twice, but the odds are less. I do not want to rent to applicants with eviction histories and if the screening is flawed I am vulnerable. 

I can't cite the actual flaw for fear the tenants will game the system. 

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

28,236
Posts
41,357
Votes
Nathan Gesner
  • Real Estate Broker
  • Cody, WY
41,357
Votes |
28,236
Posts
Nathan Gesner
  • Real Estate Broker
  • Cody, WY
ModeratorReplied

The real remedy is to not invest in California.

  • Nathan Gesner
business profile image
The DIY Landlord Book
4.7 stars
168 Reviews

Loading replies...