Skip to content

Let's keep in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter for timely insights and actionable tips on your real estate journey.

By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions
Followed Discussions Followed Categories Followed People Followed Locations
Short-Term & Vacation Rental Discussions
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 4 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

88
Posts
38
Votes
Ryan Taylor
38
Votes |
88
Posts

To Fee or Not to Fee

Ryan Taylor
Posted

Question for the people in the room that are smarter than me.

I haven't seen this topic come up, or I have just missed it. When it comes to STR's and the numbers work (CoC, Cap rate, etc.) but the property is Lease Hold vs. Fee Simple, would you still move forward as a prospect. Have you come across any issues when trying to, later on down the road, sell said property if acquired. Are LH properties less desirable due to the lease payments, even though the "numbers" work?

If you are ok with LH, are you underwriting it the same way as a fee simple, just factoring in the lease portion of the payment as an expense to make sure you are still achieving your Cap rate.

I know that LH and FS are just ways that you "own" the property, Fee Simple being the highest form of ownership, Lease Hold not owning the land, but wasn't sure if it mattered how you own the property as long as the "numbers" worked. To me it would...am I wrong...

What say you??

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

28,242
Posts
41,506
Votes
Nathan Gesner
  • Real Estate Broker
  • Cody, WY
41,506
Votes |
28,242
Posts
Nathan Gesner
  • Real Estate Broker
  • Cody, WY
ModeratorReplied
Quote from @Ryan Taylor:

Question for the people in the room that are smarter than me.

I haven't seen this topic come up, or I have just missed it. When it comes to STR's and the numbers work (CoC, Cap rate, etc.) but the property is Lease Hold vs. Fee Simple, would you still move forward as a prospect. Have you come across any issues when trying to, later on down the road, sell said property if acquired. Are LH properties less desirable due to the lease payments, even though the "numbers" work?

If you are ok with LH, are you underwriting it the same way as a fee simple, just factoring in the lease portion of the payment as an expense to make sure you are still achieving your Cap rate.

I know that LH and FS are just ways that you "own" the property, Fee Simple being the highest form of ownership, Lease Hold not owning the land, but wasn't sure if it mattered how you own the property as long as the "numbers" worked. To me it would...am I wrong...

What say you??


I'm curious who owns this and what they allow. I have properties in my area that are lease hold with US Forest Service or some other entity and they do not permit rentals of any kind.

Regardless, I wouldn't be interested unless I own the property.

  • Nathan Gesner
business profile image
The DIY Landlord Book
4.7 stars
246 Reviews

Loading replies...