Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Real Estate Deal Analysis & Advice
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 7 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

135
Posts
9
Votes
Tony Karns
  • Investor
  • Dallas TX
9
Votes |
135
Posts

House Hack vakue calculator

Tony Karns
  • Investor
  • Dallas TX
Posted

I am looking at doing a duplex house hack in TX. I am having some trouble with understanding how I go about calculating CoC return or my cap rate as I will be living in one with the hope that the other side can allow me to live mortgage free or very close to that. I am using rental spreadsheets from the BP files section, but if anyone has one they used for a house hack, that would be great. Looking for any help and advice.

  • Tony Karns
  • Most Popular Reply

    User Stats

    1,405
    Posts
    864
    Votes
    John Leavelle
    • Investor
    • La Vernia, TX
    864
    Votes |
    1,405
    Posts
    John Leavelle
    • Investor
    • La Vernia, TX
    Replied

    Howdy @Tony Karns

    Don't think you can calculate a good COC ROI. Because with you living in one unit you will more than likely have a negative Cash Flow. The best you can do is use your projected Cash Flow (after you move out) to get an idea of a COC return. If you find a Duplex that meets your Cash Flow criteria (after you move out) then that's what I would go with.

    Loading replies...