Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime

Let's keep in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter for timely insights and actionable tips on your real estate journey.

By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions
×
Try Pro Features for Free
Start your 7 day free trial. Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties.

Posted about 5 years ago

A New Class Action Lawsuit Could Upend The Real Estate Business

Normal 1595219549 Class Action

A home seller suing National Association of Realtors (NAR), Realogy, HomeServices of America, RE/MAX and Keller Williams for allegedly violating antitrust laws related to broker commissions. It aims some of the central tenets of the U.S. real estate business: Multiple Listing Services and buyer’s broker’s commissions. A new class-action lawsuit alleges that the National Association of Realtors, along with the “Big Four” Realogy, HomeServices of America, RE/MAX and Keller Williams violated federal antitrust law by conspiring to require home sellers to pay buyer’s broker’s commissions at inflated rates. The suit was first reported by Inman.

It was “Because most buyer brokers will not show homes to their clients where the seller is offering a lower buyer broker commission, or will show homes with higher commission offers first, sellers are incentivized when making the required blanket, non-negotiable offer to procure the buyer brokers’ cooperation by offering a high commission,” the complaint reads, “Absent this rule, buyer brokers would be paid by their clients and would compete to be retained by offering a lower commission.”

Filed on behalf of Christopher Moehrl, a home seller from Minnesota, the lawsuit also says it will represent any home sellers who sold property and paid a broker commission in the last four years in specific geographic areas covered by different regional MLS. This includes areas in Texas, Maryland, North Carolina, Ohio, Colorado, Michigan, Florida, Nevada, Wisconsin, Minnesota, Pennsylvania, Arizona, Virginia, Utah, and the District of Columbia. If other home sellers joined the class action, the defendants could find themselves potentially liable for millions of dollars. NAR responded by calling the lawsuit “baseless.” “The U.S. Courts have routinely found that Multiple Listing Services are pro-competitive and benefit consumers by creating great efficiencies in the home buying and selling process,” Mantill Williams, a spokesperson for NAR. “NAR looks forward to obtaining a similar precedent regarding this filing.”

“The real estate market is competitive, and the business is unique in that competitors must also cooperate to ensure a successful transaction. MLS systems facilitate that cooperation,” NAR’s website states. “MLSs are a powerful force for competition. They level the playing field so that the smallest brokerage in town can compete with the biggest multi-state firm.”

Topics: Real Estate Investment, National Association of Realtors, Real Estate Lawsuit

Work cited: TRD National, March 11, 2019

If I can help in any way please let me know, [email protected]. Stay Safe & Healthy.



Comments