Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Test dialog goes here

Let's keep in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter for timely insights and actionable tips on your real estate journey.

By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions
×
Try Pro Features for Free
Start your 7 day free trial. Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties.

Posted about 2 months ago

Private Lending Maybe a Real Bottleneck for Investors

For many real estate investors and entrepreneurs, securing funding is the first and most critical hurdle. While traditional bank loans offer low rates, their stringent requirements—extensive credit checks, steady income verification, and slow approval processes—can stall even the most promising deals. This has led many to ask: Is turning to a private lender itself a bottleneck? The answer is complex.

Contain 800x800

On the surface, private lenders solve the traditional funding problem. They offer speed, flexibility, and focus on the asset's potential rather than the borrower's personal financial history. This makes them an invaluable tool for house flippers, developers, and those building a portfolio. However, this access comes at a cost, creating a different kind of bottleneck.

The most significant constraint is the higher cost of capital. Private loans carry substantially higher interest rates and origination fees, which can drastically shrink an investor’s profit margin. A deal that works with a bank loan might be unfeasible with private financing. This pricing immediately limits the pool of viable investments, forcing investors to seek out only high-return projects.

Furthermore, private lenders impose their own strict terms. Loan-to-Value (LTV) ratios are often lower, requiring a larger down payment from the investor. They may also require proven experience, creating a catch-22 for newcomers: you need a track record to get the loan, but you need the loan to build a track record.

So, is it a bottleneck? Yes, but not in the way traditional banks are. Private lenders don’t typically bottleneck access itself for those with equity and experience; they bottleneck profitability and project scope. The challenge shifts from "Can I get the money?" to "Can I still make a strong return after paying for this money?"

The savvy investor doesn’t see private lending as a barrier, but as a specific—and expensive—tool. It’s ideal for time-sensitive deals, bridge financing, or value-add projects where the speed and flexibility justify the cost. The real bottleneck isn't the lender, but the investor’s ability to find deals where the numbers still make sense after factoring in the premium for fast, flexible capital.



Comments