Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime

Let's keep in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter for timely insights and actionable tips on your real estate journey.

By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions
×
Try Pro Features for Free
Start your 7 day free trial. Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties.

Posted about 14 years ago

Why LLCs beat Corporations in Real Estate

Why use an LLC partnership instead of a Corporation?

LLC-partnerships avoid the following corporate disadvantages by default (automatically);  by election;  or by planning. When referring to a partnership the term “partner” includes a member of an LLC or more specifically of an LLC-Partnership. Such reasons not to use corporations pertain to both rental keepers and resale flippers.

1. IRS AUDITS: Corporations (C and S) are audited more than partnerships and corporate audits are on the rise. For instance, corporations are fairly frequent targets on the issue of reasonable compensation (discussed in number 4 below).

2. COSTLY DEALER STATUS: Corporations are designed for active (ordinary income) businesses. Thus, using a corporation (C or S) for quick-sale flips is a blatant admission of costly dealer status and impairs dealer-avoidance planning. 

3. PAYROLL FILINGS: Corporations (C or S) are subject to more payroll filings because corporate shareholders are employees and must receive a reasonable W-2 salary. In the case where there are annual tax losses in the corporation, a W-2 salary could cause unnecessary taxable income to shareholder-employees. How costly! 

4. IRS SCRUTINY OVER “REASONABLE COMPENSATION” TO “C” OR “S” CORPORATION SHAREHOLDER-EMPLOYEES. Reasonable compensation essentially means that the combined amount of wages and fringe benefits cannot be disproportionate in relation to the value of the work being performed.

Learn more about Entity Structure at WealthBuildingCPA 


Comments (1)

  1. Thanks Ebere This is an excellent summary.