Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Level up your investing with Pro
Explore exclusive tools and resources to start, grow, or optimize your portfolio.
10+ investment analysis calculators
$1,000+/yr savings on landlord software
Lawyer-reviewed lease forms (annual only)
Unlimited access to the Forums

Let's keep in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter for timely insights and actionable tips on your real estate journey.

By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions
×
Try Pro Features for Free
Start your 7 day free trial. Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties.

Posted over 11 years ago

Regulation Pressures Depress Bank Profitability

“Nobody is going to invest in an industry with returns of 5 percent,” this from Christopher Flowers, a US private equity investor who specializes in financial services. As reported by the Financial Times, Mr. Flowers names regulation as the primary reason that banks profits have taken such a hit, “All the rules we’ve introduced have depressed profitability and that is a real vulnerability.”

When using the word “vulnerability,” Mr. Flowers referred to the fact that banks will be unable to raise capital should another financial crisis arise.

From this recent report in the Financial Times, a consultancy called EY did a review of the 200 biggest banks and discovered that the average return on equity was 9.74% in 2013. This number is just above the average cost of equity.

Christopher Flowers believes that trying to turn banks into a risk free business is just a waste of time and argues, “How do you make something that lends money at risk a utility?” This is a valid question, but as always, finding the balance between too much regulation and not enough regulation is an ongoing battle.

(Source: Financial Times: http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/455aabc4-0ff0-11e4-90c7-00144feabdc0.html?siteedition=intl#axzz387GJVFu7)

Posted by Corey Curwick Dutton 


Comments